New techniques enable comparative analysis of microtubule orientation, wall texture, and growth rate in intact roots of Arabidopsis.

This article explores root epidermal cell elongation and its dependence on two structural elements of cells, cortical microtubules and cellulose microfibrils. The recent identification of Arabidopsis morphology mutants with putative cell wall or cytoskeletal defects demands a procedure for examining and comparing wall architecture and microtubule organization patterns in this species. We developed methods to examine cellulose microfibrils by field emission scanning electron microscopy and microtubules by immunofluorescence in essentially intact roots. We were able to compare cellulose microfibril and microtubule alignment patterns at equivalent stages of cell expansion. Field emission scanning electron microscopy revealed that Arabidopsis root epidermal cells have typical dicot primary cell wall structure with prominent transverse cellulose microfibrils embedded in pectic substances. Our analysis showed that microtubules and microfibrils have similar orientation only during the initial phase of elongation growth. Microtubule patterns deviate from a predominantly transverse orientation while cells are still expanding, whereas cellulose microfibrils remain transverse until well after expansion finishes. We also observed microtubule-microfibril alignment discord before cells enter their elongation phase. This study and the new technology it presents provide a starting point for further investigations on the physical properties of cell walls and their mechanisms of assembly.

[1]  A. V. Crewe,et al.  Electron Gun Using a Field Emission Source , 1968 .

[2]  T. Baskin,et al.  Root morphology mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana , 1992 .

[3]  Orientation of Wall Microfibril Deposition in Root Cells of Pisum sativum L. var Alaska , 1986 .

[4]  S. Turner,et al.  BOTERO1 is required for normal orientation of cortical microtubules and anisotropic cell expansion in Arabidopsis. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[5]  A. Hardham,et al.  Oryzalin-Induced Microtubule Disassembly and Recovery in Regenerating Protoplasts of the Alga Mougeotia , 1989 .

[6]  C. Lloyd.  The Cytoskeleton in plant growth and development , 1982 .

[7]  D. Fisher,et al.  Extending the Microtubule/Microfibril paradigm. Cellulose synthesis is required for normal cortical microtubule alignment in elongating cells , 1998, Plant physiology.

[8]  B. Scheres,et al.  Cellular organisation of the Arabidopsis thaliana root. , 1993, Development.

[9]  T. Itoh.  Microfibrillar orientation of radially enlarged cells of coumarin- and colchicine-treated pine seedlings , 1976 .

[10]  Jeremy Pritchard,et al.  Xyloglucan Endotransglycosylase Activity, Microfibril Orientation and the Profiles of Cell Wall Properties Along Growing Regions of Maize Roots , 1993 .

[11]  A. Emons.  Methods for visualizing cell wall texture , 1988 .

[12]  R. Brown.  Cellulose and Other Natural Polymer Systems: Biogenesis, Structure, and Degradation , 1982 .

[13]  R. D. Preston,et al.  The physical biology of plant cell walls , 1975 .

[14]  T. Nagata,et al.  Events at the border between the M and G1 phases in highly synchronized culture to tobacco BY-2 cells , 1993 .

[15]  L. Clayton,et al.  Microtubule nucleating sites in higher plant cells identified by an auto-antibody against pericentriolar material , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  G. Wasteneys,et al.  Gibberellin-induced changes in growth anisotropy precede gibberellin-dependent changes in cortical microtubule orientation in developing epidermal cells of barley leaves. Kinematic and cytological studies on a gibberellin-responsive dwarf mutant, M489. , 2000, Plant physiology.

[17]  T. Baskin,et al.  STUNTED PLANT 1, A Gene Required for Expansion in Rapidly Elongating but Not in Dividing Cells and Mediating Root Growth Responses to Applied Cytokinin , 1995, Plant physiology.

[18]  W. Herth.  Calcofluor white and Congo red inhibit chitin microfibril assembly of Poterioochromonas: evidence for a gap between polymerization and microfibril formation , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  P. A. Richmond.  Patterns of cellulose microfibril deposition and rearrangement in Nitella: in vivo analysis by a birefringence index. [Nitella axillaris] , 1983 .

[20]  C. Lloyd.  The Cytoskeletal basis of plant growth and form , 1991 .

[21]  Jack L. Mullen,et al.  Analysis of changes in relative elemental growth rate patterns in the elongation zone of Arabidopsis roots upon gravistimulation , 1998, Planta.

[22]  J. Traas,et al.  Microtubules and cellulose microfibrils in plant cells. Simultaneous demonstration in dry cleave preparations , 1989 .

[23]  T. Giddings.  Microtubule-mediated control of microfibril deposition : a re-examination of the hypothesis , 1991 .

[24]  G. Wasteneys,et al.  Cortical Microtubule Organization and Internodal Cell Maturation in Chara corallina , 1993 .

[25]  Baskin,et al.  Regulation of growth anisotropy in well-watered and water-stressed maize roots. II. Role Of cortical microtubules and cellulose microfibrils , 1999, Plant physiology.

[26]  F. Baluška,et al.  Specific patterns of cortical and endoplasmic microtubules associated with cell growth and tissue differentiation in roots of maize (Zea mays L.) , 1992 .

[27]  S. Wick,et al.  Immunofluorescence microscopy of tubulin and microtubule arrays in plant cells. III. Transition between mitotic/cytokinetic and interphase microtubule arrays. , 1985, Cell biology international reports.

[28]  J. Traas,et al.  Changes in microtubule arrays during the differentiation of cortical root cells of Raphanus sativus. , 1984, European journal of cell biology.

[29]  R. Seagull.  Changes in microtubule organization and wall microfibril orientation during in vitro cotton fiber development: an immunofluorescent study , 1986 .

[30]  T. Hogetsu,et al.  Immunofluorescence Microscopy of Microtubule Arrangement in Root Cells of Pisum sativum L. var Alaska , 1986 .

[31]  R. Brown,et al.  Evidence for an intramembrane component associated with a cellulose microfibril-synthesizing complex in higher plants , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  P. B. Green,et al.  Structural Characteristics of Developing Nitella Internodal Cell Walls , 1958, The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology.

[33]  S. Wyatt,et al.  Growth dynamics and cytoskeleton organization during stem maturation and gravity-induced stem bending in Zea mays L. , 1998, Planta.

[34]  P. Benfey,et al.  Conditional root expansion mutants of Arabidopsis. , 1995, Development.

[35]  D. Flanders,et al.  Re-establishment of the interphase microtubule array in vacuolated plant cells, studied by confocal microscopy and 3-D imaging , 1990 .

[36]  W. Willats,et al.  Immunoprofiling of pectic polysaccharides. , 1999, Analytical biochemistry.

[37]  W Herth,et al.  Molecular analysis of cellulose biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. , 1998, Science.

[38]  J. Pawley,et al.  The case for low voltage high resolution scanning electron microscopy of biological samples. , 1989, Scanning microscopy. Supplement.

[39]  Maureen C. McCann,et al.  Direct visualization of cross-links in the primary plant cell wall , 1990 .

[40]  D. Cosgrove.  Relaxation in a high-stress environment: the molecular bases of extensible cell walls and cell enlargement. , 1997, The Plant cell.

[41]  K. Esau.  Anatomy of seed plants , 1960 .

[42]  L. M. Srivastava,et al.  Wall fibrils and microtubules in normal and gibberellic-acid-induced growth of lettuce hypocotyl cells , 1975 .

[43]  N. Carpita,et al.  Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. , 1993, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.