A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: Effects of perceptual fluency on categorization

Fluency--the ease with which people process information--is a central piece of information we take into account when we make judgments about the world. Prior research has shown that fluency affects judgments in a wide variety of domains, including frequency, familiarity, and confidence. In this paper, we present evidence that fluency also plays a role in categorization judgments. In Experiment 1, participants judged a variety of different exemplars to be worse category members if they were less fluent (because they were presented in a smaller typeface). In Experiment 2, we found that fluency also affected judgments of feature typicality. In Experiment 3, we demonstrated that the effects of fluency can be reversed when a salient attribution for reduced fluency is available (i.e., the stimuli are hard to read because they were printed by a printer with low toner). In Experiment 4 we replicated these effects using a within-subject design, which ruled out the possibility that the effects were a statistical artifact caused by aggregation of data. We propose a possible mechanism for these effects: if an exemplar and its category are closely related, activation of one will cause priming of the other, leading to increased fluency. Over time, feelings of fluency come to be used as a valid cue that can become confused with more traditional sources of information about category membership.

[1]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Concepts and Categorization , 2003 .

[2]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer.  Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: problems with using long words needlessly , 2006 .

[3]  B. Newell,et al.  The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  Heather M. Kleider,et al.  Illusions of face memory: Clarity breeds familiarity. , 2004, Journal of memory and language.

[5]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[6]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning , 1993 .

[7]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Message Within : The Role of Subjective Experience In Social Cognition And Behavior , 2000 .

[8]  Jeremy K. Miller,et al.  Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[9]  F. Keil.  Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[10]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[11]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Spontaneous Discounting of Availability in Frequency Judgment Tasks , 2022 .

[12]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing Perceptions of Vulnerability: Personal Relevance and the Use of Experiential Information in Health Judgments , 1998 .

[13]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Correlated Averages vs. Averaged Correlations: Demonstrating the Warm Glow Heuristic Beyond Aggregation. , 2005 .

[14]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988 .

[15]  D. Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Creating Illusions of Familiarity in a Cued Recall Remember/Know Paradigm , 1996 .

[16]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[18]  N. Schwarz.  Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[19]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  R. Bjork,et al.  Predicting the future and reconstructing the past: a Bayesian characterization of the utility of subjective fluency. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[21]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  A. Buchner.  Indirect effects of synthetic grammar learning in an identification task. , 1994 .

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Repetition priming of words, pseudowords, and nonwords. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  R. Hastie,et al.  Causal knowledge and categories: the effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Accessible Content and Accessibility Experiences: The Interplay of Declarative and Experiential Information in Judgment , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[27]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[28]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment , 2003 .

[29]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  The Psychology of Evaluation : Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion , 2003 .

[30]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .

[31]  Rolf Reber,et al.  Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[32]  R. Rescorla.  A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[33]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[34]  L D Williams,et al.  The source of feelings of familiarity: the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  P. Winkielman,et al.  Drawing inferences from feelings: The role of naive beliefs. , 2000 .

[36]  Richard J Tunney,et al.  Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  B. Monin.  The warm glow heuristic: when liking leads to familiarity. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality , 1990 .

[39]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[40]  B. W. Whittlesea.  Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[41]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Decision Making under Ambiguity , 1986 .

[42]  C. Nickerson.  Does Willingness to Pay Reflect the Purchase of Moral Satisfaction? A Reconsideration of Kahneman and Knetsch , 1995 .

[43]  D. Witherspoon,et al.  The effect of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task , 1985, Memory & cognition.