Influence of Natural Voice Disguise Techniques on Automatic Speaker Recognition
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Elizabeth Shriberg,et al. A Study of Intentional Voice Modifications for Evading Automatic Speaker Recognition , 2006, 2006 IEEE Odyssey - The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop.
[2] Piotr STARONIEWICZ,et al. Tests of robustness of GMM speaker verification in VoIP telephony , 2007 .
[3] Nicholas W. D. Evans,et al. Evasion and obfuscation in speaker recognition surveillance and forensics , 2014, 2nd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics.
[4] R. Rodman,et al. Computer Recognition of Speakers Who Disguise Their Voice , 2000 .
[5] Piotr Staroniewicz,et al. Considering basic emotional state information in speaker verification , 2016, 2016 4th International Conference on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF).
[6] Douglas A. Reynolds,et al. A Tutorial on Text-Independent Speaker Verification , 2004, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..
[7] Gérard Chollet,et al. Voice Disguise and Automatic Detection: Review and Perspectives , 2005, WNSP.
[8] Javier Ortega-Garcia,et al. Effect of voice disguise on the performance of a forensic automatic speaker recognition system , 2004, Odyssey.
[9] Urszula Jorasz. Celebrations of 50 years of the Acoustic Centre at the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań , 2007 .
[10] Cuiling Zhang,et al. Voice disguise and automatic speaker recognition. , 2008, Forensic science international.
[11] Wojciech Majewski,et al. Imitation of Target Speakers by Different Types of Impersonators , 2010, COST 2102 Conference.
[12] Andrzej Dobrucki,et al. Test signals used in electroacoustics and speech technology , 2017, 2017 Signal Processing: Algorithms, Architectures, Arrangements, and Applications (SPA).
[14] Alvin F. Martin,et al. The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance , 1997, EUROSPEECH.