Risk Taking and Social Exposure

The paper examines in the laboratory how risk-taking situations are affected by the conditions of observing other’s choices (observer) and being observed by others (source). By extending Yechiam et al.’s (2008) experimental design to the domain of gains we find that observers are more probable than sources to choose risky alternatives producing rare gains than equiprobable gains. The impact of social exposure is also analyzed and interpreted in the context of personality traits to assess how heterogeneity influences risky decisions.

[1]  Seda Ertac,et al.  Deciding to Decide: Gender, Leadership and Risk-Taking in Groups , 2010 .

[2]  John H. Miller,et al.  NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM , 2002 .

[3]  Paul A. Bell,et al.  Effects of Heat, Social Facilitation, Sex Differences, and Task Difficulty on Reaction Time , 1982 .

[4]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[5]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[6]  J. Sonnemans,et al.  Social comparison and risky choices , 2009 .

[7]  P. Costa,et al.  Antisocial Personality Disorder among Drug Abusers: Relations to Other Personality Diagnoses and the Five-Factor Model of Personality , 1993, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[8]  F. Lucidi,et al.  The role of personality in positively and negatively framed risky health decisions , 2004 .

[9]  W. Horrey,et al.  The effect of conformity tendency on pedestrians' road-crossing intentions in China: an application of the theory of planned behavior. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Personality Pathways to Unsafe Sex: Personality, Condom Use, and HIV Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[11]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  David Ansic,et al.  Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. , 1997 .

[13]  Erik Theissen,et al.  Short Sale Constraints, Divergence of Opinion and Asset Values: Evidence from the Laboratory , 2006 .

[14]  D. Ariely,et al.  Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed , 2000 .

[15]  Jeffrey P. Carpenter,et al.  The Demand for Punishment , 2007 .

[16]  M. Just,et al.  The framing effect and risky decisions: Examining cognitive functions with fMRI , 2005 .

[17]  I. Erev,et al.  Small feedback‐based decisions and their limited correspondence to description‐based decisions , 2003 .

[18]  Brian Hare,et al.  Decision making across social contexts: competition increases preferences for risk in chimpanzees and bonobos , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Ferdinand M. Vieider,et al.  Social influences on risk attitudes: Applications in economics , 2012 .

[20]  L. A. Pervin.  Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[21]  Joel Sobel,et al.  INTERDEPENDENT PREFERENCES AND RECIPROCITY , 2005 .

[22]  M. Ashton,et al.  Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[24]  Barbara Class,et al.  Different risk thresholds in pedestrian road crossing behaviour: a comparison of French and Japanese approaches. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Debraj Ray,et al.  Choice Shifts in Groups: A Decision-Theoretic Basis , 2006 .

[26]  Etienne Mullet,et al.  Risk Perception and Personality Facets , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Brian Hare,et al.  Does Involuntary Neural Activation Increase Public Goods Contributions , 2007 .

[28]  M. Rabin,et al.  UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL PREFERENCES WITH SIMPLE TESTS , 2001 .

[29]  A. Ichino,et al.  Clean Evidence on Peer Effects , 2006, Journal of Labor Economics.

[30]  Ernan Haruvy,et al.  Remarks on Virtual World and Virtual Reality Experiments , 2011 .

[31]  Pat Barclay.  Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the ''tragedy of the commons'' , 2004 .

[32]  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004 .

[33]  R. D. Clark,et al.  Where is the Risky Shift? Dependence on Instructions. , 1969 .

[34]  M. Leary,et al.  Handbook of individual differences in social behavior , 2009 .

[35]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[36]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[37]  Daria Knoch,et al.  Personality, risky health behaviour, and perceived susceptibility to health risks , 1999 .

[38]  Terence C Burnham,et al.  Engineering Human Cooperation , 2007, Human nature.

[39]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[40]  M. C. Stafford,et al.  On Choice Behavior in Individual and Social Situations , 1988 .

[41]  S. Brosnan,et al.  Monkeys reject unequal pay , 2003, Nature.

[42]  Philip Holmes,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Social Influence on Decision Making , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  H. Lamm,et al.  Risky shift as a function of group members' value of risk and need for approval , 1971 .

[44]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Interdependent Utilities: How Social Ranking Affects Choice Behavior , 2008, PloS one.

[45]  J. Kagel,et al.  Other Regarding Preferences: A Selective Survey of Experimental Results , 2012 .

[46]  A. Innocenti,et al.  Voting by Ballots and Feet in the Laboratory , 2011 .

[47]  Robert R. McCrae,et al.  Cross-Cultural Research on the Five-Factor Model of Personality , 2002 .

[48]  A. Furnham,et al.  Personality traits and academic examination performance , 2003 .

[49]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  A comparison of three structural models for personality: the big three , 1993 .

[50]  E. Yechiam,et al.  Observing others’ behavior and risk taking in decisions from experience , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[51]  E. Yechiam,et al.  Losses as modulators of attention: review and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  M. Bateson,et al.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting , 2006, Biology Letters.

[53]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism--Experimental Evidence and New Theories. , 2005 .

[54]  M. Hamed.  Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings , 2001 .

[55]  D. Fessler,et al.  Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. , 2005 .

[56]  Christopher C. Rosen,et al.  Measuring Risk Attitudes Controlling for Personality Traits , 2008 .

[57]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Social facilitation and imitation in group risk-taking , 1970 .

[58]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Self-, other-, and ideal-judgments of risk and caution as a function of the five-factor model of personality , 2000 .

[59]  J. Spratt.  The risky shift , 1991, Journal of surgical oncology.