Simple method for quantifying viable bacterial numbers in sputum.

AIMS--To establish a simple method of quantitative culture for determining the viable bacterial numbers present in expectorated sputum samples. METHODS--Sputum samples were homogenised with dithiothreitol, sterile saline or glass beads to determine which method recovered the greatest number of viable bacteria. Culture broths were also incubated with dithiothreitol and sampled over time to determine its effect on bacterial viability. Sputum samples homogenised with dithiothreitol were diluted in sterile saline and sampled using either standard bacteriological loops or a precision pipette to determine which method resulted in the least variation. RESULTS--Homogenisation of sputum using dithiothreitol increased the recovery of viable bacteria compared with sterile glass beads and/or saline, with no apparent effect on bacterial viability when incubated with culture broths. By inoculating agar plates with 10(-3), 10(-4) and 10(-5) dilutions of the homogenised sputum sample, all potential pathogens could easily be identified. A 10 microliter sample volume dispensed by precision pipette and spread with a "hockey stick" resulted in the least variation between plates (less than 16%) and an even distribution of bacterial colonies. Numbers of viable bacteria recovered from different aliquots of individual sputum samples were generally of the same order of magnitude. CONCLUSIONS--This method represents a relatively quick and simple technique for accurately quantifying viable bacteria present in sputum samples. The use of a small portion appears to be representative of the sample as a whole.

[1]  H. Gallis ACUTE BRONCHITIS AND ACUTE EXACERBATIONS OF CHRONIC BRONCHITIS: THE ROLE OF NEW ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS , 1994 .

[2]  N. Høiby,et al.  Pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis , 1993, The Lancet.

[3]  A. Cripps,et al.  Bacterial colonisation of the respiratory tract in chronic bronchitis. , 1990, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[4]  A. Cheng,et al.  The bacteriology of bronchiectasis in Hong Kong investigated by protected catheter brush and bronchoalveolar lavage. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[5]  Stockley Ra Chronic bronchitis: the antiproteinase/proteinase balance and the effect of infection and corticosteroids. , 1988 .

[6]  A. von Graevenitz,et al.  Gram stain and culture of morning and 24 h sputum in the diagnosis of bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a dogma disputed. , 1988, The European respiratory journal.

[7]  R. Stockley Chronic bronchitis: the antiproteinase/proteinase balance and the effect of infection and corticosteroids. , 1988, Clinics in Chest Medicine.

[8]  P. Cole,et al.  Simple method of monitoring colonising microbial load in chronic bronchial sepsis: pilot comparison of reduction in colonising microbial load with antibiotics given intermittently and continuously. , 1987, Journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  J. Govan,et al.  Rational parameters for antibiotic therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis , 1987, Infection.

[10]  R. Stockley,et al.  Short term response of patients with bronchiectasis to treatment with amoxycillin given in standard or high doses orally or by inhalation. , 1986, Thorax.

[11]  R. Stockley,et al.  Effect of antibiotic treatment on sputum elastase in bronchiectatic outpatients in a stable clinical state. , 1984, Thorax.

[12]  A. Smith,et al.  Selective media for the quantitation of bacteria in cystic fibrosis sputum. , 1984, Journal of medical microbiology.

[13]  A. C. Albers,et al.  Accuracy of calibrated-loop transfer , 1983, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  M. Kalin,et al.  Etiological diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia by gram stain and quantitative culture of expectorates. Leukocytes or alveolar macrophages as indicators of sample representativity. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[15]  D. Goldmann,et al.  Bacteriology of sputum in cystic fibrosis: evaluation of dithiothreitol as a mucolytic agent , 1980, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[16]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Bacteriology of expectorated sputum with quantitative culture and wash technique compared to transtracheal aspirates. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[17]  M. Wilson,et al.  Quantitative sputum culture as a means of excluding false positive reports in the routine microbiology laboratory , 1972, Journal of clinical pathology.

[18]  D. Turk The bacteriology of chronic bronchitis. , 1971, Journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  P. Monroe,et al.  Diagnostic and therapeutic advantages of serial quantitative cultures of fresh sputum in acute bacterial pneumonia. , 1969, The American review of respiratory disease.

[20]  H. Muchmore,et al.  Quantitation of microorganisms in sputum. , 1969, Applied microbiology.

[21]  R. C. Kory,et al.  Sputum liquefying agents: a comparative in vitro evaluation. , 1969, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[22]  M. Willis,et al.  Quantitative bacteriology of sputum. , 1968, The American review of respiratory disease.