Allometry of human fertility and energy use

The flux of energy and materials constrains all organisms, and allometric relationships between rates of energy consumption and other biological rates are manifest at many levels of biological organization. Although human ecology is unusual in many respects, human populations also face energetic constraints. Here we present a model relating fertility rates to per capita energy consumption rates in contemporary human nations. Fertility declines as energy consumption increases with a scaling exponent of )1 ⁄ 3a s predicted by allometric theory. The decline may be explained by parental trade-offs between the number of children and the energetic investment in each child. We hypothesize that the )1 ⁄ 3 exponent results from the scaling properties of the networked infrastructure that delivers energy to consumers. This allometric analysis of human fertility offers a framework for understanding the demographic transition to smaller family sizes, with implications for human population growth, resource use and sustainability.

[1]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[2]  James H. Brown,et al.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. , 1999, Science.

[3]  M. Livi-bacci,et al.  A Concise History of World Population , 1993 .

[4]  R. E. Jones,et al.  The Economic History of World Population. , 1979 .

[5]  J. Damuth,et al.  Population density and body size in mammals , 1981, Nature.

[6]  James H. Brown,et al.  Scaling in biology: patterns and processes, causes and consequences , 2000 .

[7]  M. Mulder.  The demographic transition: are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Christopher C. Smith,et al.  The Optimal Balance between Size and Number of Offspring , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Massimo Livi Bacci,et al.  A Concise History of World Population , 1992 .

[10]  M. Hochberg,et al.  DISEASE DIVERSITY AND HUMAN FERTILITY , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  Kim Hill,et al.  LIFE HISTORY TRAITS IN HUMANS: Theory and Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[12]  S. K. Morgan Ernest,et al.  LIFE HISTORY CHARACTERISTICS OF PLACENTAL NONVOLANT MAMMALS , 2003 .

[13]  A. Coale,et al.  New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States , 1963 .

[14]  James H Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of metabolic rate from molecules and mitochondria to cells and mammals , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Size and form in efficient transportation networks , 1999, Nature.

[16]  Hillard Kaplan,et al.  A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies , 1996 .

[17]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Evolutionary approach to below replacement fertility , 2002, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[18]  R. Peters.  The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[19]  J. Randers,et al.  Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  W. Lutz,et al.  Determinants of human population growth. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  HUMAN APPROPRIATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1986 .

[22]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[23]  R. Mace.  The coevolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance strategies. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  R. Foley,et al.  Latitudinal patterns and environmental determinants of recent human cultural diversity: do humans follow biogeographical rules? , 2002 .