On deep annotation

The success of the Semantic Web crucially depends on the easy creation, integration and use of semantic data. For this purpose, we consider an integration scenario that defies core assumptions of current metadata construction methods. We describe a framework of metadata creation when web pages are generated from a database and the database owner is cooperatively participating in the Semantic Web. This leads us to the definition of ontology mapping rules by manual semantic annotation and the usage of the mapping rules and of web services for semantic queries. In order to create metadata, the framework combines the presentation layer with the data description layer -- in contrast to "conventional" annotation, which remains at the presentation layer. Therefore, we refer to the framework as deep annotation 1.We consider deep annotation as particularly valid because, (i), web pages generated from databases outnumber static web pages, (ii), annotation of web pages may be a very intuitive way to create semantic data from a database and, (iii), data from databases should not be materialized as RDF files, it should remain where it can be handled most efficiently -- in its databases.

[1]  Gio Wiederhold,et al.  Intelligent integration of information , 1993, SIGMOD Conference.

[2]  Terence Critchlow,et al.  Automatic Generation of Warehouse Mediators Using an Ontology Engine , 1998, KRDB.

[3]  Steffen Staab,et al.  On2broker: Semantic-Based Access to Information Sources at the WWW , 1999, Intelligent Information Integration.

[4]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Semantic community Web portals , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[5]  Nicholas Kushmerick,et al.  Wrapper induction: Efficiency and expressiveness , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Martin L. Kersten,et al.  A Graph-Oriented Model for Articulation of Ontology Interdependencies , 1999, EDBT.

[7]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  The Chimaera Ontology Environment , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[8]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[9]  Fabio Ciravegna,et al.  Adaptive Information Extraction from Text by Rule Induction and Generalisation , 2001, IJCAI.

[10]  Silvana Castano,et al.  Semantic integration of heterogeneous information sources , 2001, Data Knowl. Eng..

[11]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Mappings for Reuse in Knowledge-based Systems , 2001 .

[12]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[13]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Generic Schema Matching with Cupid , 2001, VLDB.

[14]  Oh,et al.  SEAL — A Framework for Developing SEmantic PortALs , 2001 .

[15]  Arnaud Sahuguet,et al.  Building intelligent Web applications using lightweight wrappers , 2001, Data Knowl. Eng..

[16]  Steffen Staab,et al.  S-CREAM: Semiautomatic CREAtion of Metadata , 2002, SAAKM@ECAI.

[17]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web , 2002, WWW '02.

[18]  Boris Motik,et al.  MAFRA - A MApping FRAmework for Distributed Ontologies , 2002, EKAW.

[19]  James A. Hendler,et al.  New Tools for the Semantic Web , 2002, EKAW.

[20]  York Sure-Vetter,et al.  Managing User Focused Access to Distributed Knowledge , 2002, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[21]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Authoring and annotation of web pages in CREAM , 2002, WWW.

[22]  Dimitrios Gunopulos,et al.  Architecture and Implementation of an XQuery-based Information Integration Platform. , 2002 .

[23]  Raphael Volz,et al.  Migrating data-intensive web sites into the Semantic Web , 2002, SAC '02.

[24]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Guiding Ontology Developement by Methodology and Inferencing , 2002 .

[25]  Arthur Stutt,et al.  MnM: Ontology Driven Semi-automatic and Automatic Support for Semantic Markup , 2002, EKAW.