The New Zealand National Eye Bank: Survival and Visual Outcome 1 Year After Penetrating Keratoplasty

Purpose: To identify potential donor, recipient, surgical, and postoperative factors that may influence survival and visual outcome of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Methods: As part of a prospective longitudinal study, the electronic records of the New Zealand National Eye Bank were analyzed for the 10-year period from 1994-2003. Both univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. Results: During the study period, the New Zealand National Eye Bank supplied 1820 corneas for PKP and 1629 (90%) had 1-year follow-up data. Overall, the 1-year survival rate was 87% (n = 1429). Donor factors including age, donor source, cause of death, death-to-preservation interval, endothelial cell density, donor lens status, and storage duration, were not significantly associated with decreased survival. The leading cause of PKP failure was irreversible rejection (7%, n = 114). Independent risk factors identified for decreased PKP survival were: 1 or more episodes of reversible rejection, active inflammation at PKP, preexisting corneal vascularization, intraoperative complications, small graft size (≤7.25 mm), large graft size (≥8.5 mm), preoperative glaucoma, and a preoperative diagnosis of regraft or trauma. A best-corrected Snellen visual acuity of 6/12 or better was achieved in 60% of eyes [mean: 6/15 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.40)]. Keratoconus and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy were the diagnoses with best survival and visual outcome, whereas, bullous keratopathy, trauma or noninfective keratitis were associated with poorer visual outcome. Conclusions: Several independent risk factors were identified that significantly influenced PKP first year survival outcome. This information is valuable to patients and surgeons with respect to determining prognosis and clinical decision making.

[1]  D. Coster,et al.  Risk Factors for Human Corneal Graft Failure Within the Australian Corneal Graft Registry , 2008, Transplantation.

[2]  C. McGhee,et al.  Rapid visual recovery after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus , 2008, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[3]  Y. Chan,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes: the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[4]  Robert W. Thompson,et al.  Risk factors for various causes of failure in initial corneal grafts. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  Robert W. Thompson,et al.  Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[6]  W. Christen,et al.  Long-term outcomes of combined penetrating keratoplasty with iris-sutured intraocular lens implantation. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[7]  U. Rehany,et al.  Preexisting and Postoperative Glaucoma in Repeated Corneal Transplantation , 2002, Cornea.

[8]  P. Gain,et al.  Cornea procurement from very old donors: post organ culture cornea outcome and recipient graft outcome , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  U. Stenevi,et al.  Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Naor,et al.  Corneal Graft Outcome Study , 2001, Cornea.

[11]  U. Rehany,et al.  The profile of repeated corneal transplantation. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[12]  K. Pesudovs,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and success. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[13]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  The effects of donor age on the outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in adults. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[14]  L. Dandona,et al.  Survival analysis and visual outcome in a large series of corneal transplants in India , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  S. Gore,et al.  Conclusions of the corneal transplant follow up study , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  T. Wong,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in the Singapore National Eye Centre and donor cornea acquisition in the Singapore Eye Bank. , 1997, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[17]  D. Yorston,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in Africa: graft survival and visual outcome. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  S. Gore,et al.  Clinical and Surgical Factors Influencing Corneal Graft Survival, Visual Acuity, and Astigmatism , 1996 .

[19]  E. Cohen,et al.  Long-term results after penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  S. Gore,et al.  INFLUENCE OF DONOR AND HISTOCOMPATIBILITY FACTORS ON CORNEAL GRAFT OUTCOME , 1994, Transplantation.

[21]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[22]  K. Kenyon,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty and anterior segment reconstruction for severe ocular trauma. , 1992, German journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  S. Gore,et al.  Corneal graft survival and visual outcome. A multicenter Study. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[24]  P. Laughrea,et al.  Risk factors of corneal graft failure. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[25]  R. Marks,et al.  Five-year corneal graft survival. A large, single-center patient cohort. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  E. Cohen,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty after ocular trauma. , 1990, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  N. Ehlers,et al.  The influence of donor age and post mortem time on corneal graft survival and thickness when employing banked donor material , 1988, Acta ophthalmologica.

[28]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  The triple procedure. Analysis of outcome, refraction, and intraocular lens power calculation. , 1986, Ophthalmology.