Socialism, knowledge, the instrumental valuation principle and the enhancement of individual dignity

Abstract Socialism is frequently associated with central planning, public ownership, anathema to markets and the emasculation of the individual. Recent market socialist contributions attempt to overcome socialism's seeming resistance to markets. However, such contributions are frequently undermined by Hayek's invocation of fragmented knowledge. This article endeavours to contribute to a broadly conceived socialism that is not grounded in a particular array of institutions, but one which, via the instrumental valuation principle, the capabilities approach and Dewey's conceptualization of knowledge, offers the prospect of enhancing individual dignity. The instrumental valuation principle is viewed as key to socialism's engagement with dignity as it provides the framework for the enhancement of egalitarianism, democracy and the undermining of invidious institutional arrangements.

[1]  D. Statman.  Humiliation, dignity and self-respect , 2000 .

[2]  P. Baran.  The Theory of the Leisure Class , 1957 .

[3]  John O'Neill,et al.  The Market: Ethics, Knowledge and Politics , 1998 .

[4]  M. Nussbaum.  Capabilities and Human Rights , 1997 .

[5]  François Moreau,et al.  The role of the state in evolutionary economics , 2004 .

[6]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  The evolution of institutional economics : agency, structure and Darwinism in American institutionalism , 2004 .

[7]  Susan Haack,et al.  Pragmatism, Old and New , 2004 .

[8]  Chandra Kumar.  Foucault and Rorty on Truth and Ideology: A Pragmatist View from the Left , 2005 .

[9]  Avishai Margalit,et al.  The Decent Society , 1996 .

[10]  T. Burczak.  Socialism after Hayek , 2006 .

[11]  S. Cullenberg.  Socialism's Burden: Toward a “Thin” Definition of Socialism , 1992 .

[12]  Recasting Egalitarianism: New Rules for Communities, States and Markets , 2000 .

[13]  Peter C. Murrell,et al.  Can Neoclassical Economics Underpin the Reform of Centrally Planned Economies , 1991 .

[14]  John Dewey,et al.  Theory of valuation , 1939 .

[15]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  If Nelson and Winter are only half right about tacit knowledge, which half? A Searlean critique of 'codification' , 2003 .

[16]  John Dewey,et al.  Philosophy and Civilization , 1931 .

[17]  P. Arestis,et al.  The Economic Analysis Underlying the 'Third Way' , 2001 .

[18]  A. Edgar.  A Response to Nordenfelt's “The Varieties of Dignity” , 2004, Health Care Analysis.

[19]  Ben Fine,et al.  Social Capital Versus Social Theory , 2000 .

[20]  Marc R. Tool,et al.  Essays in honour of Paul Dale Bush , 1998 .

[21]  C. Milton.  Human Dignity , 2011, Nursing science quarterly.

[22]  C. Poirot.  Is Pragmatism Good for Anything? Towards a Theory of Impractical Economics , 2008 .

[23]  T. Uebel.  Calculation in kind and marketless socialism: On Otto Neurath's utopian economics , 2008 .

[24]  R. Garnett.  Postmodernism and Theories of Value: New Grounds for Institutionalist/Marxist Dialogue? , 1999 .

[25]  R. Tilman.  John Dewey as User and Critic of Thorstein Veblen's Ideas , 1998, Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[26]  Marc R. Tool,et al.  Institutional economics and the theory of social value : essays in honor of Marc R. Tool , 1995 .

[27]  Glen W. Atkinson.  Instrumentalism and Economic Policy: The Quest for Reasonable Value , 1987 .

[28]  John Kenneth Galbraith,et al.  Economics and the Public Purpose , 1974 .

[29]  B. Fine.  The World of Consumption: The Material and Cultural Revisited , 1993 .

[30]  J. O'Neill.  Socialism, associations and the market , 2003 .

[31]  G. DeMartino.  Global economy, global justice : theoretical objections and policy alternatives to neoliberalism , 2000 .

[32]  S. Cullenberg.  Overdetermination, Totality, and Institutions: A Genealogy of a Marxist Institutionalist Economics , 1999 .

[33]  L. Nordenfelt.  The Varieties of Dignity , 2004, Health Care Analysis.

[34]  Institutional economics : theory, method, policy , 1993 .

[35]  D. Harvey.  A Brief History of Neoliberalism , 2020, The Anti-Capitalist Chronicles.

[36]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[37]  Poverty, capabilities and freedom , 2004 .

[38]  F. Adaman,et al.  Participatory planning as a deliberative democratic process: a response to Hodgson's critique , 2001 .

[39]  G. G. Diligenskii,et al.  Individualism, Old and New , 2000 .

[40]  Marc R. Tool,et al.  Institutional Analysis and Economic Policy , 2012 .

[41]  G. Hodgson.  The limits to participatory planning: a reply to Adaman and Devine , 2005 .

[42]  H. Sherman,et al.  Reclaiming Evolution: A Dialogue Between Marxism and Institutionalism on Social Change , 2000 .

[43]  John Holloway.  Change The World Without Taking Power: The Meaning of Revolution Today , 2002 .

[44]  T. Porter.  The Culture of Quantification and the History of Public Reason , 2004, Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[45]  The Place of Science in Modern Civilization. , 1906 .

[46]  Pedro Tamayo.  Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium , 2003 .

[47]  Marc R. Tool.  The Theory of Instrumental Value: Extensions, Clarifications , 1993 .

[48]  F. Adaman,et al.  The economics calculation debate: lessons for socialists , 1996 .

[49]  M. Nussbaum.  CAPABILITIES AS FUNDAMENTAL ENTITLEMENTS: SEN AND SOCIAL JUSTICE , 2003 .

[50]  M. Klaes.  Evolutionary economics: In defence of ‘vagueness’ , 2004 .

[51]  K. L. Avio,et al.  A Modest Proposal for Institutional Economics , 2004 .

[52]  Marc R. Tool.  Pricing, valuation and systems : essays in neoinstitutional economics , 1995 .

[53]  V. Colapietro.  Doing — and Undoing — the Done Thing: Dewey and Bourdieu on Habituation, Agency, and Transformation , 2004 .

[54]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time , 2001 .

[55]  John R. Searle.  What is an institution? , 2005, Journal of Institutional Economics.