Object Properties and Frame of Reference in Spatial Memory Representations

Abstract Considerable evidence suggests that humans flexibly select reference frames for spatial memory based on qualities such as the shape of the environment, the configuration of elements, and one's own egocentric experience of the space. We propose that the elements, or objects themselves, may also convey useful information about salient reference orientations. In Experiment 1, participants viewed objects elongated along their front-back axis that were either all oriented in the same direction or oriented at 10 different randomly selected directions. Participants in the random orientation condition were most accurate at the orientation they visually experienced at learning, whereas participants in the shared orientation condition were most accurate at an orientation consistent with or orthogonal to the coincident object orientations. Experiment 2 replicated these effects using animals that were less elongated but had clear conceptual orientations. These results suggest that the principles governing spatial memory capitalize on a wide range of properties that likely interact to support an enduring representation.

[1]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Layout geometry in encoding and retrieval of spatial memory. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  T. McNamara,et al.  Layout geometry in the selection of intrinsic frames of reference from multiple viewpoints. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  B. Tversky,et al.  Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking , 2009, Cognition.

[5]  F. Attneave,et al.  What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping , 1970 .

[6]  Rolf Nelson,et al.  When does grouping happen? , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[7]  Irwin N. Jankovic,et al.  Principles of spatial problem solving. , 1982 .

[8]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  “What” Effects on “Where”: Functional Influences on Spatial Relations , 1999 .

[9]  T. McNamara,et al.  Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Amy L Shelton,et al.  Fixed versus dynamic orientations in environmental learning from ground-level and aerial perspectives , 2007, Psychological research.

[11]  T. McNamara,et al.  Visual Memories from Nonvisual Experiences , 2001, Psychological science.

[12]  Amy L. Shelton,et al.  Integrating object locations in the memory representation of a spatial layout , 2008 .

[13]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Three-Dimensional Bilateral Symmetry Bias in Judgments of Figural Identity and Orientation , 1997 .

[14]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Orientation Specificity in Representations of Place , 1997 .

[15]  J. Beck Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping , 1966 .

[16]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  The Influence of Functional Relations on Spatial Term Selection , 1996 .

[17]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Interpreting direction from graphic displays: Spatial frames of reference , 1980 .

[18]  D. C. Higgins Human Spatial Orientation , 1967, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[19]  A. Shelton,et al.  Path information effects in visual and proprioceptive spatial learning. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[20]  H. Nothdurft Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation , 1985, Vision Research.

[21]  Dan Gordon,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE-COMPARATIVE APPROACH TO ANALYSIS OF DISTORTION IN MENTAL MAPS , 1984 .

[22]  M. May,et al.  Navigating in a Virtual Environment With Map-Acquired Knowledge: Encoding and Alignment Effects , 1995 .

[23]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[24]  P. Thorndyke Distance estimation from cognitive maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  S. Milgram,et al.  Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. , 1969 .

[26]  Steffen Werner,et al.  Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[27]  Naohide Yamamoto,et al.  Orientation dependence of spatial memory acquired from auditory experience , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  T. McNamara,et al.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  David Waller,et al.  Intrinsic array structure is neither necessary nor sufficient for nonegocentric coding of spatial layouts , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  R. Gardiner,et al.  A History of Cartography , 1969 .

[31]  Naohide Yamamoto,et al.  Visual and proprioceptive representations in spatial memory , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[32]  T. McNamara,et al.  Different mental representations for place recognition and goal localization , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Eidetic images in insects: their role in navigation , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  B. Tversky Distortions in memory for maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  T. McNamara,et al.  Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  J. Rieser Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Joseph Glicksohn,et al.  Rotation, orientation, and cognitive mapping , 1994 .

[39]  T. McNamara,et al.  Multiple views of spatial memory , 1997 .

[40]  T. McNamara,et al.  Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Amy L Shelton,et al.  Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  Timothy P McNamara,et al.  Spatial memory and perspective taking , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[43]  Amy L. Shelton,et al.  Sequential versus simultaneous viewing of an environment: Effects of focal attention to individual object locations on visual spatial learning , 2009 .