Recent advances in standards for collaborative Digital Anatomic Pathology

ContextCollaborative Digital Anatomic Pathology refers to the use of information technology that supports the creation and sharing or exchange of information, including data and images, during the complex workflow performed in an Anatomic Pathology department from specimen reception to report transmission and exploitation. Collaborative Digital Anatomic Pathology can only be fully achieved using medical informatics standards. The goal of the international integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) initiative is precisely specifying how medical informatics standards should be implemented to meet specific health care needs and making systems integration more efficient and less expensive.ObjectiveTo define the best use of medical informatics standards in order to share and exchange machine-readable structured reports and their evidences (including whole slide images) within hospitals and across healthcare facilities.MethodsSpecific working groups dedicated to Anatomy Pathology within multiple standards organizations defined standard-based data structures for Anatomic Pathology reports and images as well as informatic transactions in order to integrate Anatomic Pathology information into the electronic healthcare enterprise.ResultsThe DICOM supplements 122 and 145 provide flexible object information definitions dedicated respectively to specimen description and Whole Slide Image acquisition, storage and display. The content profile “Anatomic Pathology Structured Report” (APSR) provides standard templates for structured reports in which textual observations may be bound to digital images or regions of interest. Anatomic Pathology observations are encoded using an international controlled vocabulary defined by the IHE Anatomic Pathology domain that is currently being mapped to SNOMED CT concepts.ConclusionRecent advances in standards for Collaborative Digital Anatomic Pathology are a unique opportunity to share or exchange Anatomic Pathology structured reports that are interoperable at an international level. The use of machine-readable format of APSR supports the development of decision support as well as secondary use of Anatomic Pathology information for epidemiology or clinical research.

[1]  Yukako Yagi,et al.  Use of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology quality assurance: design and pilot validation studies. , 2006, Human pathology.

[2]  Ronald S Weinstein,et al.  Innovations in medical imaging and virtual microscopy. , 2005, Human pathology.

[3]  Jorma Isola,et al.  The Application of JPEG2000 in Virtual Microscopy , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[4]  Stefan Starke.  Ihe - Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise , 2008 .

[5]  Jinan Fiaidhi,et al.  Ubiquitous Health and Medical Informatics: The Ubiquity 2.0 Trend and Beyond , 2010 .

[6]  Marcial García-Rojo,et al.  Serendipia: Castilla-La Mancha telepathology network , 2008, Diagnostic pathology.

[7]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Communications , 1983 .

[8]  Yukako Yagi,et al.  Primary histologic diagnosis using automated whole slide imaging: a validation study , 2006, BMC clinical pathology.

[9]  Fred R. Dee,et al.  Utility of 2-D and 3-D Virtual Microscopy in Cervical Cytology Education and Testing , 2007, Acta Cytologica.

[10]  Jimmie Stewart,et al.  Virtual microscopy for cytology proficiency testing: Are we there yet? , 2007, Cancer.

[11]  Richard Berendt,et al.  Implementation of a Canadian External Quality Assurance Program for Breast Cancer Biomarkers: An Initiative of Canadian Quality Control in Immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry , 2009, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[12]  Amnon Shabo,et al.  Model Formulation: HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2 , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  Gloria Bueno,et al.  Review of imaging solutions for integrated quantitative immunohistochemistry in the Pathology daily practice. , 2010, Folia histochemica et cytobiologica.

[14]  S. Trent Rosenbloom,et al.  Research Paper: Using SNOMED CT to Represent Two Interface Terminologies , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  Vincenzo Della Mea,et al.  User attitudes in analyzing digital slides in a quality control test bed: A preliminary study , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[16]  K. Leslie,et al.  Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports. , 1994, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[17]  Tim Benson.  Comprar Principles of Health Interoperability HL7 and SNOMED | Benson, Tim | 9781848828025 | Springer , 2009 .

[18]  Raouf E Nakhleh,et al.  Patient safety and error reduction in surgical pathology. , 2008, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[19]  Mikael Lundin,et al.  Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading. , 2005, Human pathology.

[20]  A. Rector.  Clinical Terminology: Why Is it so Hard? , 1999, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[21]  Mari Mino-Kenudson,et al.  Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: a pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[22]  Saul Suster,et al.  Reporting guidelines for clinical laboratory reports in surgical pathology. , 2008, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[23]  Philip J. B. Brown,et al.  Evaluation of the quality of information retrieval of clinical findings from a computerized patient database using a semantic terminological model. , 2000, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[24]  M M Morente,et al.  Virtual microscopy in virtual tumor banking. , 2006, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[25]  Bruce A Beckwith,et al.  Standards to support information systems integration in anatomic pathology. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  M. Becich,et al.  Defining the role of anatomic pathology images in the multimedia electronic medical record-a preliminary report , 2000, AMIA.

[27]  Stefano Forti,et al.  Digital Storage of Glass Slides for Quality Assurance in Histopathology and Cytopathology , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[28]  Drew Pg.  Integrating the healthcare enterprise. , 2000, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[29]  Tim Benson,et al.  Principles of Health Interoperability HL7 and SNOMED , 2009 .

[30]  A. L. Rector.  Clinical terminology : Why is it so hard? : Challenges to Progresses , 1999 .

[31]  Christel Daniel-Le Bozec,et al.  Digital Pathology in Europe: Coordinating Patient Care and Research Efforts , 2009, MIE.

[32]  Christel Daniel,et al.  Digital Pathology and Virtual Microscopy Integration in E-Health Records , 2010 .