The nutrient environment affects therapy

Nutrient availability affects cancer cell metabolism and therapeutic responses Understanding the molecular basis of cancer has led to a revolution in how cancers are classified and treated. Subsets of patients benefit from precision-medicine drugs that target growth-promoting signaling networks, but not all cancer patients respond to these approaches (1). Precision medicine is largely built on the assumption that cancer cell–intrinsic factors, such as genetic mutations or epigenetic identity, determine which pathways and processes are required in cells and thus response to therapies. However, in many cases, the presence of particular genetic lesions is insufficient to identify patients that will respond to a drug (1). For instance, standard cell culture models have not identified the subsets of cancer patients that respond to most conventional chemotherapies (1). Nevertheless, these chemotherapy drugs remain standard of care for many cancers and, in some cases, contribute to curative regimens. Emerging data suggest that beyond cell-intrinsic factors, nutrient availability in the tumor microenvironment can also influence drug response. This highlights the importance of understanding the microenvironmental factors that dictate which cellular processes are essential for disease progression and ultimately how tumors respond to treatments that target these processes.

[1]  M. Celeste Simon,et al.  The impact of O2 availability on human cancer , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  E. White,et al.  Recent insights into the function of autophagy in cancer , 2016, Genes & development.

[3]  Chi V Dang,et al.  Exploiting Metabolic Vulnerabilities of Cancer with Precision and Accuracy. , 2017, Trends in cell biology.

[4]  T. Rana,et al.  Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen for Essential Cell Growth Mediators in Mutant KRAS Colorectal Cancers. , 2017, Cancer research.

[5]  D. Tuveson,et al.  The Utilization of Extracellular Proteins as Nutrients Is Suppressed by mTORC1 , 2015, Cell.

[6]  Marc Bickle,et al.  Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  Norman Pavelka,et al.  Emerging and evolving concepts in gene essentiality , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Xin Gao,et al.  Physiologic Medium Rewires Cellular Metabolism and Reveals Uric Acid as an Endogenous Inhibitor of UMP Synthase , 2017, Cell.

[9]  H. Eagle,et al.  Nutrition needs of mammalian cells in tissue culture. , 1955, Science.

[10]  Michael D. Buck,et al.  Metabolic Instruction of Immunity , 2017, Cell.

[11]  A. Letai,et al.  Functional precision cancer medicine—moving beyond pure genomics , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[12]  E. Gottlieb,et al.  The metabolic fate of acetate in cancer , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  M. V. Vander Heiden,et al.  Environment Dictates Dependence on Mitochondrial Complex I for NAD+ and Aspartate Production and Determines Cancer Cell Sensitivity to Metformin. , 2016, Cell metabolism.

[14]  M. V. Vander Heiden,et al.  Environmental cystine drives glutamine anaplerosis and sensitizes cancer cells to glutaminase inhibition , 2017, eLife.

[15]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Glutamine Synthetase activity fuels nucleotide biosynthesis and supports growth of glutamine-restricted glioblastoma , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.