Study of pulsed-current loading of direct methanol fuel cells using a new time-domain model based on bi-functional methanol oxidation kinetics

This work describes a non-linear time-domain model of a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) and uses that model to show that pulsed-current loading of a direct methanol fuel cell does not improve average efficiency. Unlike previous system level models, the one presented here is capable of predicting the step response of the fuel cell over its entire voltage range. This improved model is based on bi-functional methanol oxidation reaction kinetics and is derived from a lumped, four-step reaction mechanism. In total, six states are incorporated into the model: three states for intermediate surface adsorbates on the anode electrode, two states for the anode and cathode potentials, and one state for the liquid methanol concentration in the anode compartment. Model parameters were identified using experimental data from a real DMFC. The model was applied to study the steady-state and transient performance of a DMFC with the objective to understand the possibility of improving the efficiency of the DMFC by using periodic current pulses to drive adsorbed CO from the anode catalyst. Our results indicate that the pulsed-current method does indeed boost the average potential of the DMFC by 40 mV; but on the other hand, executing that strategy reduces the overall operating efficiency and does not yield any net benefit.

[1]  Keith Scott,et al.  Dynamic response of the direct methanol fuel cell under variable load conditions , 2000 .

[2]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  Water and Methanol Uptakes in Nafion Membranes and Membrane Effects on Direct Methanol Cell Performance , 2000 .

[3]  A. Hamnett,et al.  Mechanism and electrocatalysis in the direct methanol fuel cell , 1997 .

[4]  T. Iwasita.  Electrocatalysis of methanol oxidation , 2002 .

[5]  E. Martin,et al.  A kinetic model for the direct methanol fuel cell anode based on surface coverage , 2006 .

[6]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Rate expression for electrochemical oxidation of methanol on a direct methanol fuel cell anode , 2005 .

[7]  Werner Lehnert,et al.  Cell voltage transients of a gas-fed direct methanol fuel cell , 2004 .

[8]  L. Carrette,et al.  Improvement of CO tolerance of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells by a pulsing technique , 2001 .

[9]  G. Lindbergh,et al.  Temperature-Dependent Kinetics of the Anode in the DMFC , 2004 .

[10]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Liquid-Feed Direct Methanol Fuel Cells , 2003 .

[11]  K. Scott,et al.  A one dimensional model of a methanol fuel cell anode , 2004 .

[12]  U. Stimming,et al.  Improvement of the Performance of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Using a Pulse Technique , 2006 .

[13]  Massimo Ceraolo,et al.  Modelling static and dynamic behaviour of proton exchange membrane fuel cells on the basis of electro-chemical description , 2003 .

[14]  Keith Scott,et al.  The effect of operating conditions on the dynamic response of the direct methanol fuel cell , 2000 .

[15]  Pertti Kauranen,et al.  Kinetics of methanol oxidation on carbon-supported Pt and Pt + Ru catalysts , 1996 .

[16]  Klaus Gärtner,et al.  Performance Modeling of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell , 2003 .

[17]  Ulrike Krewer,et al.  Transfer function analysis of the dynamic behaviour of DMFCs: Response to step changes in cell current , 2006 .

[18]  Hoo-Gon Choi,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of 5-W direct methanol fuel cell stack , 2006 .

[19]  F. Büchi,et al.  Investigation of the Transversal Water Profile in Nafion Membranes in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 2001 .

[20]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Heat and power management of a direct-methanol-fuel-cell (DMFC) system , 2002 .

[21]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Dynamics of the direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC): experiments and model-based analysis , 2001 .