The secondary frame in spider orb webs: the detail that makes the difference

Spider orb webs are multifunctional structures, the main function of which is to dissipate the kinetic energy of the impacting prey, while minimizing structural damage. There is no single explanation for their remarkable strength and ductility. However, it is clear that topology is decisive in the structural performance upon impact, and the arrangement of the different silk threads in the web must also exert an effect. The aim of this study is to show how a slight variation in the geometry markedly affects the prey-capture ability of spider orb webs. The study is focused on the secondary frame, a thread interposed between radial and primary frame strands, the importance of which has not been examined until now. The simulation of the impact performance of webs using different lengths of the secondary frame clarifies its structural role, which has proven to be decisive. Furthermore, the study explains why secondary frame threads of moderate length, as commonly encountered, enable the capture of prey with higher energy without a marked increase in the volume of silk used.

[1]  B. Opell,et al.  Economics of spider orb-webs: the benefits of producing adhesive capture thread and of recycling silk , 1998 .

[2]  Ingi Agnarsson,et al.  Biomaterial evolution parallels behavioral innovation in the origin of orb-like spider webs , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Ramón Zaera,et al.  Uncovering changes in spider orb-web topology owing to aerodynamic effects , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  M. S. Alam,et al.  Mechanics in naturally compliant structures , 2007 .

[5]  J. Gosline,et al.  The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Structural engineering of an orb-spider's web , 1995, Nature.

[7]  S. Zschokke.  Form and function of the orb-web , 2002 .

[8]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Nanoconfinement of spider silk fibrils begets superior strength, extensibility, and toughness. , 2011, Nano letters.

[9]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Forces in the spider orb web , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Todd A Blackledge,et al.  Biomechanical variation of silk links spinning plasticity to spider web function. , 2009, Zoology.

[11]  Thomas Scheibel,et al.  The elaborate structure of spider silk , 2008, Prion.

[12]  S. Zschokke.  Early stages of orb web construction in Araneus diadematus Clerck , 1996 .

[13]  T. Hesselberg,et al.  The web repair behaviour of an orb spider , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SPIDER'S SILK AND THEIR ROLE IN THE DESIGN OF ORB-WEBS , 1976 .

[15]  William G. Eberhard,et al.  Early stages of orb construction by Philoponella vicina, Leucauge mariana, and Nephila clavipes (Araneae, Uloboridae and Tetragnathidae), and their phylogenetic implications , 1990 .

[16]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  Molecular and nanostructural mechanisms of deformation, strength and toughness of spider silk fibrils. , 2010, Nano letters.

[17]  G. Puglisi,et al.  Damage, self-healing, and hysteresis in spider silks. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Design Variability in Web Geometry of an Orb-Weaving Spider , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[19]  Manuel Elices,et al.  Sequential origin in the high performance properties of orb spider dragline silk , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[20]  G. V. Guinea,et al.  Identification and dynamics of polyglycine II nanocrystals in Argiope trifasciata flagelliform silk , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Steven W. Cranford,et al.  Synergetic material and structure optimization yields robust spider web anchorages. , 2013, Small.

[22]  Andrew T. Sensenig,et al.  Adult spiders use tougher silk: ontogenetic changes in web architecture and silk biomechanics in the orb-weaver spider , 2011 .

[23]  Todd A. Blackledge,et al.  Changes in the Adhesive Properties of Spider Aggregate Glue During the Evolution of Cobwebs , 2011, Scientific reports.

[24]  Thomas Hesselberg,et al.  The mechanical properties of the non-sticky spiral in Nephila orb webs (Araneae, Nephilidae) , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Structural optimization of 3D-printed synthetic spider webs for high strength , 2015, Nature Communications.

[26]  W. Eberhard.  The ecology of the web ofUloborus diversus (Araneae: Uloboridae) , 1971, Oecologia.

[27]  Victor Manuel Ortega-Jimenez,et al.  Spiderweb deformation induced by electrostatically charged insects , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Sean P Kelly,et al.  Spider orb webs rely on radial threads to absorb prey kinetic energy , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  Chris Holland,et al.  The Speed of Sound in Silk: Linking Material Performance to Biological Function , 2014, Advanced materials.

[30]  R. Daza,et al.  Spider silk gut: Development and characterization of a novel strong spider silk fiber , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Nonlinear material behaviour of spider silk yields robust webs , 2012, Nature.

[32]  C. Craig,et al.  The ecological and evolutionary interdependence between web architecture and web silk spun by orb web weaving spiders , 1987 .

[33]  B. J. Mason,et al.  The behaviour of freely falling cylinders and cones in a viscous fluid , 1965, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[34]  D. Tritton.  Experiments on the flow past a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers , 1959, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.