Central governance based on monitoring and reporting solves the collective-risk social dilemma

Abstract Monitoring and reporting incorrect acts are pervasive for maintaining human cooperation, but in theory it is unclear how they influence each other. To explore their possible interactions we consider spatially structured population where individuals face the collective-risk social dilemma. In our minimal model cooperator players report defection according to the loss of their interests. In parallel we assume a monitoring institution that monitors all group member and identifies wrong behavior with a certain probability. In response to these feedbacks a sanctioning institution develops punishment schemes by imposing fines on related defector players stochastically. By means of Monte Carlo simulations, we find that the introduction of monitoring and reporting mechanisms can greatly promote the evolution of cooperation and there exists a sudden change of the cooperation level by varying model parameters, which can lead to an outbreak of cooperation for solving the collective-risk social dilemma.

[1]  Kenneth A. Rodman International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment . By Oran R. Young. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989. 248p. $32.50 cloth, $10.95 paper. , 1990 .

[2]  Guangming Xie,et al.  Cooperation in group-structured populations with two layers of interactions , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Han-Xin Yang,et al.  Promoting cooperation by punishing minority , 2018, Appl. Math. Comput..

[4]  Stanley C. Solomon,et al.  Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history , 1999 .

[5]  Francisco C Santos,et al.  Climate governance as a complex adaptive system: reply to comments on "climate change governance, cooperation and self-organization". , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[6]  Tatsuo Unemi,et al.  Replicator dynamics in public goods games with reward funds. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Mingan Shao,et al.  Soil and water loss from the Loess Plateau in China , 2000 .

[8]  Amy R. Poteete,et al.  Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice , 2010 .

[9]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Impact of Social Punishment on Cooperative Behavior in Complex Networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[10]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of altruistic punishment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[12]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game , 2010, ArXiv.

[13]  C. Hauert,et al.  Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Michael Kirley,et al.  The effects of time-varying rewards on the evolution of cooperation , 2009, Evol. Intell..

[15]  Chen Shen,et al.  Environment promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial voluntary prisoner's dilemma game , 2017, Appl. Math. Comput..

[16]  Lei Gao,et al.  Collective punishment is more effective than collective reward for promoting cooperation , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[18]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Nonlinear effects of group size on collective action and resource outcomes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Averting group failures in collective-risk social dilemmas , 2012, ArXiv.

[20]  Michael Kosfeld,et al.  Conditional Cooperation and Costly Monitoring Explain Success in Forest Commons Management , 2010, Science.

[21]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Competitions between prosocial exclusions and punishments in finite populations , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[23]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Evolution of public cooperation in a monitored society with implicated punishment and within-group enforcement , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Punishment and inspection for governing the commons in a feedback-evolving game , 2018, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  Tatsuya Sasaki,et al.  The evolution of cooperation by social exclusion , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Risk-driven migration and the collective-risk social dilemma , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Marco Tomassini,et al.  Binary birth-death dynamics and the expansion of cooperation by means of self-organized growth , 2014, ArXiv.

[28]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[29]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary advantages of adaptive rewarding , 2012, 1208.3457.

[30]  Long Wang,et al.  Climate collective risk dilemma with feedback of real-time temperatures , 2014 .

[31]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Statistical Physics of Human Cooperation , 2017, ArXiv.

[32]  Changyin Sun,et al.  Randomness and diversity matter in the maintenance of the public resources , 2017 .

[33]  Garrison W. Greenwood,et al.  Evolution of strategies for the collective-risk social dilemma relating to climate change , 2011 .

[34]  Long Wang,et al.  Mixed strategy under generalized public goods games. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Excessive abundance of common resources deters social responsibility , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[36]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Replicator dynamics for public goods game with resource allocation in large populations , 2018, Appl. Math. Comput..

[37]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Topology-independent impact of noise on cooperation in spatial public goods games. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  Changyin Sun,et al.  The effect of the stake size on the evolution of fairness , 2018, Appl. Math. Comput..

[39]  Zhou Wan-tian,et al.  On Environmental Culture , 2005 .

[40]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Exploiting a cognitive bias promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments , 2018, Nature Communications.

[41]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on a square lattice , 1997, cond-mat/9710096.

[42]  Francisco C. Santos Climate Change Governance, Cooperation and Self-organization , 2016 .

[43]  Jochem Marotzke,et al.  The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Martin W. Holdgate A perspective of environmental pollution , 1979 .

[45]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game , 2010, 1007.0431.

[46]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Alliance formation with exclusion in the spatial public goods game , 2017, Physical review. E.

[47]  Long Wang,et al.  Social exclusion in finite populations. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  Mao-Bin Hu,et al.  Asymmetric cost in snowdrift game on scale-free networks , 2009 .

[50]  Huijia Li,et al.  Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.