An Experiment for Measuring Business Process Maturity with Different Maturity Models

Since the 2000s, Business Process Management (BPM) has evolved into a comprehensively studied discipline that goes beyond the boundaries of particular business processes. By also affecting enterprise-wide capabilities (such as an organisational culture and structure that support a processoriented way of working), BPM can now correctly be called Business Process Orientation (BPO). Meanwhile, various maturity models have been developed to help organisations adopt a processoriented way of working based on step-by-step best practices. The present article reports on a case study in which the process portfolio of an organisation is assessed by different maturity models that each cover a different set of process-oriented capabilities. The purpose is to reflect on how business process maturity is currently measured, and to explore relevant considerations for practitioners, scholars and maturity model designers. Therefore, we investigate a possible difference in maturity scores that are obtained based on model-related characteristics (e.g. capabilities, scale and calculation technique) and respondent-related characteristics (e.g. organisational function). For instance, based on an experimental design, the original maturity scores are recalculated for different maturity scales and different calculation techniques. Follow-up research can broaden our experiment from multiple maturity models in a single case to multiple maturity models in multiple cases.

[1]  Thad Dunning,et al.  Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences , 2012 .

[2]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Developing Maturity Models for IT Management , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[3]  H. William Dettmer,et al.  Goldratt's Theory of Constraints: A Systems Approach to Continuous Improvement , 1997 .

[4]  Mojca Indihar Stemberger,et al.  The impact of business process orientation on financial and non-financial performance , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[5]  Geert Poels,et al.  A conceptual framework and classification of capability areas for business process maturity , 2014, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[6]  English Emmenegger Patrick Dunning, Thad (2012): Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design­Based Approach. Cambridge: , 2012 .

[7]  Jan Recker,et al.  Which cultural values matter to business process management?: Results from a global Delphi study , 2013, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[8]  Geert Poels,et al.  Choosing the right business process maturity model , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Geert Poels,et al.  Questioning the Design of Business Process Maturity Models , 2011, EIS.

[10]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Business Process Management , 2016, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[11]  Janni Nielsen,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) , 2008 .

[12]  T. Dunning Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach , 2012 .

[13]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas , 2007 .

[14]  Kevin McCormack,et al.  Business Process Orientation: Gaining the E-Business Competitive Advantage , 2001 .

[15]  Faculteit Economie,et al.  Defining Business Process Maturity. A Journey towards Excellence. , 2011 .

[16]  Markus Nüttgens,et al.  Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM): Konzeption, Anwendung und Nutzenpotenziale , 2014, HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[17]  M. Hammer The process audit. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[18]  Amy Van Looy Business Process Maturity - A Comparative Study on a Sample of Business Process Maturity Models , 2014, Springer Briefs in Business Process Management.

[19]  Tomislav Hernaus Business Process Maturity of a Company , 2008 .

[20]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Natural "Natural Experiments" in Economics , 2000 .