“Commanding Your Robot” Older Adults’ Preferences for Methods of Robot Control

Home robots have the potential to assist older adults in maintaining their independence. However, robots deployed in older adults’ homes will be required to interact with untrained, novice users. The way untrained users, such as older adults, provide commands or control the robot (i.e., “method of robot control”) will likely impact the ease of use and adoption of the robot. The current study explored older adults’ preferences for controlling robots. Twelve independently-living older adults (ages 68-79) observed a functioning personal robot in a home setting, and were interviewed about their opinions regarding specific methods of robot control (i.e., laser pointer, physical manipulation, and devices). The older adults perceived advantages and disadvantages of these specific methods, including ‘specificity in command’, ‘accurate robot performance’, ‘limitations in their own physical capability’, and ‘challenges in using control device.’ The older adults also completed a questionnaire measuring their willingness to use 10 different types of methods of robot control. These data revealed that older adults were willing to use a variety of methods. Although older adults were limited in their spontaneous ideas about robot control (i.e., limited to voice command), once exposed to other options they were willing and open to a variety of control methods.

[1]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Spatiotemporal correspondence as a metric for human-like robot motion , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  M. Lawton Aging and Performance of Home Tasks , 1990, Human factors.

[3]  Youngjin Park,et al.  An application of speech/speaker recognition system for human-robot interaction , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems.

[4]  Arvin Agah,et al.  Human interactions with intelligent systems: research taxonomy , 2000, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[5]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[6]  Zhe Xu,et al.  A point-and-click interface for the real world: Laser designation of objects for mobile manipulation , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[7]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[8]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[9]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Assisted driving of a mobile remote presence system: System design and controlled user evaluation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation , 1995 .

[11]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[12]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[13]  Advait Jain,et al.  A clickable world: Behavior selection through pointing and context for mobile manipulation , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[15]  Zhen Zhang,et al.  Gesture Recognition System Based on Acceleration Data for Robocup Referees , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Natural Computation.

[16]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Is a robot an appliance, teammate, or friend? age-related differences in expectations of and attitudes towards personal home-based robots , 2008 .

[17]  Tiffany L. Chen,et al.  A Direct Physical Interface for Navigation and Positioning of a Robotic Nursing Assistant , 2011, Adv. Robotics.

[18]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[19]  Marita A. O'Brien,et al.  Diffusion of Technology: Frequency of use for Younger and Older Adults , 2011, Ageing international.

[20]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  More than a Servant: Self-Reported Willingness of Younger and Older Adults to having a Robot perform Interactive and Critical Tasks in the Home , 2009, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual Meeting.

[21]  Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  Robot Programming by Demonstration , 2010, SIMPAR.

[22]  D. Fox,et al.  Towards Personal Service Robots for the Elderly , 1999 .

[23]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. , 2006, Psychology and aging.