Differential relational encoding of categorical information in memory for action events

Memory for action phrases is better if the actions are enacted in subject-performed tasks (SPTs) than if they are only listened to in verbal tasks (VTs). This effect is ascribed to better item-specific encoding of SPTs than of VTs. The role of interitem relational information is controversial, and the findings of clustering with categorically structured lists are inconsistent (see Engelkamp, 1998). The present study contributes to clarifying these effects by demonstrating that intentional relational encoding can be used more efficiently in VTs than in SPTs and influences the degree of clustering. If the list structure is not obvious, inducing intentional encoding by presenting the category labels prior to list presentation and asking subjects to use this preinformation increases clustering in VTs but not in SPTs. Without preinformation, clustering scores of VTs and SPTs did not differ; with preinformation, clustering of VTs was stronger than that of SPTs. The authors suggest how the inconsistent findings with regard to clustering effects can be explained.

[1]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[2]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Pair-relational encoding of performed nouns and verbs , 1991 .

[4]  U. Olofsson Win some, lose some: Hypermnesia for actions reflects increased item-specific processing , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[5]  L. Bäckman,et al.  New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Johannes Engelkamp,et al.  Gains and Losses in Action Memory , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  M. J. Sharps,et al.  Facilitation of free recall by categorical blocking depends on stimulus type , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[8]  G. Ritchey Picture superiority in free recall: the effects of organization and elaboration. , 1980, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[9]  J Engelkamp,et al.  Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. , 1980 .

[11]  J. Engelkamp,et al.  The role of item-specific information for the serial position curve in free recall. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  M. Knopf Having shaved a kiwi fruit: Memory of unfamiliar subject-performed actions , 1991 .

[13]  G. Einstein,et al.  Relational and item-specific information in memory , 1981 .

[14]  N. Mulligan,et al.  The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Johannes Engelkamp,et al.  Free recall and organization as a function of varying relational encoding in action memory , 2002, Psychological research.

[16]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Remembering actions and words , 2000 .

[17]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy. , 1998, Memory.

[18]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Negative Cueing Effects with Weak and Strong Intralist Cues , 1999 .

[19]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Similar and Different: The Differentiation of Basic-Level Categories , 1997 .

[20]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks , 1997 .

[21]  D. J. Burns,et al.  Item gains and losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction. , 1993 .

[22]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Human Memory: Paradigms and Paradoxes , 1992 .

[23]  Sam C. Brown,et al.  Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. , 1971 .

[24]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[25]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Feature memory and binding in young and older adults , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Encoding difficulty and memory: toward a unifying theory , 1986 .

[27]  Johannes Engelkamp,et al.  Nouns and verbs in paired-associate learning: Instructional effects , 1986 .

[28]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Spreading activation and arousal of false memories. , 2001 .

[29]  M. Norris,et al.  Activity memory and aging: the role of motor retrieval and strategic processing. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[30]  Reza Kormi-Nouri,et al.  The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view , 1995 .

[31]  R. Hunt,et al.  Category size effects in recall: The roles of relational and individual item information. , 1984 .

[32]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  On the generality of some memory laws , 1981 .

[33]  J Engelkamp,et al.  Visual imagery and enactment of actions in memory. , 1995, British journal of psychology.

[34]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Does motor encoding enhance relational information? , 1989 .

[35]  W. A. Bousfield The Occurrence of Clustering in the Recall of Randomly Arranged Associates , 1953 .

[36]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Human Memory: A Multimodal Approach , 1994 .

[37]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[38]  J Engelkamp,et al.  Levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[39]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  H. Zimmer Memory after motoric encoding in a generation-recognition model , 1991 .

[41]  J. Engelkamp Memory for actions , 1998 .

[42]  Suzanne Donnenwerth-Nolan,et al.  Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test , 1981 .

[43]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative considerations in encoding difficulty effects , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[44]  M. Naveh-Benjamin Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  T. Helstrup,et al.  One, two, or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts ☆ , 1987 .

[46]  J. Engelkamp Organisation and Recall in Verbal Tasks and in Subject-performed Tasks , 1996 .

[47]  J. Engelkamp,et al.  Memory for actions: Item and relational information in categorized lists , 2004, Psychological research.

[48]  N. Mulligan Generation and hypermnesia. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  M. Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Adult age differences in episodic memory: further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  J Engelkamp,et al.  Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.