Usage of and Compliance with Power Tactics in Routine Versus Nonroutine Work Settings

This study examines situational determinants of power usage and compliance derived from the Interpersonal Power Interaction Model. Organizations where routine tasks predominate were compared with those where complex tasks prevail. Samples of workers (N = 194) and supervisors (N = 100) from four companies representing routine tasks and complex ones completed three versions of the Interpersonal Power Inventory (Raven, Schwarzwald & Koslowsky, 1998). Results indicated that in settings where routine tasks predominate usage of and compliance with harsh power tactics was greater than in complex ones. Yet, soft tactics were not related to task complexity. It was also found that rank and tactics interacted. Regardless of settings, supervisors as compared to subordinates reported more frequent usage of soft tactics and less frequent usage of harsh ones. The discussion suggests a mechanism for understanding these patterns.

[1]  B. Raven,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring a Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence1 , 1998 .

[2]  B. Raven A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. , 1992 .

[3]  G. Graen,et al.  A Role-Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach , 1975 .

[4]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. , 1985 .

[5]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations , 1991 .

[6]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Power in and Around Organizations , 1983 .

[7]  B. Raven,et al.  Kurt Lewin Address: Influence, Power, Religion, and the Mechanisms of Social Control , 1999 .

[8]  A. Eagly The science and politics of comparing women and men , 1995 .

[9]  B. Raven,et al.  The Bases of Power: Origins and Recent Developments. A Presentation in Honor of John R. P. French on the Occasion of His Receiving the Kurt Lewin Award. , 1992 .

[10]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  CONSEQUENCES FOR MANAGERS OF USING SINGLE INFLUENCE TACTICS AND COMBINATIONS OF TACTICS , 1992 .

[11]  Paula Johnson Women and Power: Toward a Theory of Effectiveness , 1976 .

[12]  J. Schwarzwald,et al.  The use of power tactics to gain compliance: Testing aspects of Raven's (1988) Theory in conflictual situations , 1993 .

[13]  A. Eagly Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation , 1987 .

[14]  William J. Haga,et al.  A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process , 1975 .

[15]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[16]  J. Schwarzwald,et al.  Gender, Self‐Esteem, and Focus of Interest in the Use of Power Strategies by Adolescents in Conflict Situations Schwarzwald and Koslowsky , 1999 .

[17]  Joseph Schwarzwald,et al.  On the Relationship between Subordinates’ Compliance to Power Sources and Organisational Attitudes , 2001 .

[18]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Social-Role versus Structural Models of Gender and Influence Use in Organizations , 1998 .

[19]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  Power strategies in intimate relationships. , 1980 .

[20]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[21]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Gender and Social Influence: A Social Psychological Analysis. , 1983 .

[22]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[23]  E. Harrison The managerial decision-making process , 1975 .

[24]  M. Sussmann,et al.  Preferences for forms of supervisory social influence , 1989 .

[25]  Thomas V. Bonoma,et al.  Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? , 1971 .

[26]  Robert Elias,et al.  Conflict and power , 1993 .

[27]  Joseph Schwarzwald,et al.  The Power Interaction Model: Theory, methodology, and empirical applications. , 2001 .

[28]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[29]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[30]  R. Baron Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of the type a behavior pattern and self-monitoring☆ , 1989 .