Science Education and Students with Learning Disabilities

Students with learning disabilities (LD) are increasingly expected to master content in the general education curriculum, making the need for effective instructional supports more important than ever before. Science is a part of the curriculum that can be particularly challenging to students with LD because of the diverse demands it places on cognitive performance. In this summary we review a number of strategies that have been validated for learners with LD. The strategies include supports for (a) verbal learning of declarative information, (b) processing information in texts, (c) activities-based instruction/experiential learning, (d) scientific thinking and reasoning, and (e) differentiated instruction. We also summarize the research regarding the impact of teacher behavior on achievement for students with LD in science education. The strategies reviewed yield tangible and positive effect sizes that suggest that their application to the target domain will substantially improve outcomes for students with LD in science education.

[1]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Differentiated Curriculum Enhancements in Inclusive Fifth-Grade Science Classes , 2009 .

[2]  J. Levin,et al.  Facilitating the Acquisition of Science Facts in Learning Disabled Students , 1985 .

[3]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Promoting Relational Thinking: Elaborative Interrogation for Students with Mild Disabilities , 1994 .

[4]  T. Lovitt,et al.  The Effectiveness of Textbook Adaptations in Life Science for High School Students with Learning Disabilities , 1988, Journal of learning disabilities.

[5]  E. Ellis.  Integrative Strategy Instruction: A Potential Model for Teaching Content Area Subjects to Adolescents with Learning Disabilities , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.

[6]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Differentiated Curriculum Enhancement in Inclusive Middle School Science , 2006 .

[7]  Frederick J. Brigham.  Teacher enthusiasm in learning disabilities classrooms: Effects on learning and behavior. , 1992 .

[8]  Jennifer R. Wolgemuth,et al.  The Effects of Mnemonic Interventions on Academic Outcomes for Youth with Disabilities: A Systematic Review , 2008 .

[9]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Mnemonic Instruction of Science Concepts , 1988 .

[10]  Richard T. Boon,et al.  Correlates of Inquiry Learning in Science , 2001 .

[11]  A. Benavot.  The Rise and Decline of Vocational Education. , 1983 .

[12]  Wendy W. Murawski,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Co-Teaching Research , 2001 .

[13]  R. Atkinson.  Mnemotechnics in Second Language Learning. , 1975 .

[14]  M. Young.  From Constructivism to Realism in the Sociology of the Curriculum , 2008 .

[15]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Promoting Word Recognition, Fluency, and Reading Comprehension in Young Children , 2005 .

[16]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Making Science Accessible to All: Results of a Design Experiment in Inclusive Classrooms , 2001 .

[17]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Do Special Education Interventions Improve Learning of Secondary Content? A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[18]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Maximizing What Exceptional Students Can Learn , 1985 .

[19]  Donald D. Deshler,et al.  The Use and Effectiveness of a Comparison Routine in Diverse Secondary Content Classrooms. , 2002 .

[20]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Curriculum Enhancements in Inclusive Secondary Social Studies Classrooms , 2011 .

[21]  T. Lovitt,et al.  Adapting Science Materials for Regular and Learning Disabled Seventh Graders , 1986 .

[22]  T. Lovitt,et al.  Strategies for Adapting Science Textbooks for Youth with Learning Disabilities , 1994 .

[23]  Kimberly A. McDuffie,et al.  Differential Effects of Peer Tutoring in Co-Taught and Non-Co-Taught Classes: Results for Content Learning and Student-Teacher Interactions , 2009 .

[24]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Improving Reasoning and Recall: The Differential Effects of Elaborative Interrogation and Mnemonic Elaboration , 1993 .

[25]  J. Cawley,et al.  LITERACY PROFICIENCY AND SCIENCE FOR STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES , 2001 .

[26]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Current Approaches to Science Education , 1993 .

[27]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Extended mnemonic instruction with learning disabled students. , 1986 .

[28]  T. Scruggs,et al.  The Effectiveness of Mnemonic Instruction for Students with Learning and Behavior Problems: An Update and Research Synthesis , 2000 .

[29]  J. Levin,et al.  Mnemonic Strategy Instruction with Learning Disabled Adolescents , 1985, Journal of learning disabilities.

[30]  Bridget Dalton,et al.  Supported Inquiry Science , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[31]  Kimberly A. McDuffie,et al.  What is Published in the Field of Special Education? An Analysis of 11 Prominent Journals , 2009 .

[32]  Panayota Mantzicopoulos,et al.  “A place where living things affect and depend on each other”: Qualitative and quantitative outcomes associated with inclusive science teaching , 1998 .

[33]  Jeffrey P. Bakken,et al.  READING COMPREHENSION OF EXPOSITORY SCIENCE MATERIAL AND STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES: A COMPARISON OF STRATEGIES , 1997 .

[34]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Reasoning and Remembering , 1995 .

[35]  Jeffrey P. Bakken,et al.  Reading Versus Doing: The Relative Effects of Textbook-Based and Inquiry-Oriented Approaches to Science Learning in Special Education Classrooms , 1993 .

[36]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Classroom Applications of Mnemonic Instruction: Acquisition, Maintenance, and Generalization , 1991, Exceptional children.

[37]  John R. Staver,et al.  Science Instruction for the Mildly Handicapped: Direct Instruction versus Discovery Teaching. , 1992 .

[38]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Text Versus Hands-On Science Curriculum , 1994 .

[39]  J. Cawley,et al.  Including Students with Disabilities into the General Education Science Classroom , 2002 .

[40]  T. Scruggs,et al.  HOW EFFECTIVE IS INQUIRY LEARNING FOR STUDENTS WITH MILD DISABILITIES? , 1997 .