Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Control for a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Application with Online Least Squares System Identification

In comparison to classical control approaches in the field of electrical drives like the field-oriented control (FOC), model predictive control (MPC) approaches are able to provide a higher control performance. This refers to shorter settling times, lower overshoots, and a better decoupling of control variables in case of multi-variable controls. However, this can only be achieved if the used prediction model covers the actual behavior of the plant sufficiently well. In case of model deviations, the performance utilizing MPC remains below its potential. This results in effects like increased current ripple or steady state setpoint deviations. In order to achieve a high control performance, it is therefore necessary to adapt the model to the real plant behavior. When using an online system identification, a less accurate model is sufficient for commissioning of the drive system. In this paper, the combination of a finite-control-set MPC (FCS-MPC) with a system identification is proposed. The method does not require high-frequency signal injection, but uses the measured values already required for the FCS-MPC. An evaluation of the least squares-based identification on a laboratory test bench showed that the model accuracy and thus the control performance could be improved by an online update of the prediction models.

[1]  M. Ghanbari,et al.  Parameter Estimation of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Using Orthogonal Projection and Recursive Least Squares Combinatorial Algorithm , 2015 .

[2]  Song Wang,et al.  Windowed Least Square Algorithm Based PMSM Parameters Estimation , 2013 .

[3]  Joachim Bocker,et al.  Koopman Operator Based Finite-Set Model Predictive Control for Electrical Drives , 2018, 1804.00854.

[4]  Samir Kouro,et al.  Model Predictive Control: MPC's Role in the Evolution of Power Electronics , 2015, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[5]  Olivier Bachelier,et al.  A simplified least squares identification of permanent magnet synchronous motor parameters at standstill , 2013, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[6]  Marian P. Kazmierkowski,et al.  “Predictive control in power electronics and drives” , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  S. Brunton,et al.  Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Leopoldo G. Franquelo,et al.  Model Predictive Control: A Review of Its Applications in Power Electronics , 2014, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[9]  Stefan Klus,et al.  Koopman operator-based model reduction for switched-system control of PDEs , 2017, Autom..

[10]  P. Schmid,et al.  Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Joachim Bocker,et al.  Efficiency-optimized Model Predictive Torque Control for IPMSM , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON).

[12]  Igor Mezic,et al.  On Convergence of Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition to the Koopman Operator , 2017, J. Nonlinear Sci..

[13]  Marco Rivera,et al.  Model Predictive Control for Power Converters and Drives: Advances and Trends , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Steven L. Brunton,et al.  Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Control , 2014, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[15]  Yong Chen,et al.  Online adaptive parameter identification of PMSM based on the dead-time compensation , 2015 .