A comparative study between operability of fluidized-bed and fixed-bed reactors to produce synthesis gas through tri-reforming

Fluidized-bed reactor has been suggested as a suitable candidate for syngas production due to its special advantages such as elimination of pressure drop problem and bad temperature profile distribution. In this study the fixed-bed and fluidized-bed tri-reformer configurations to produce syngas are modeled heterogeneously based on the conservation mass and energy balances. The obtained data are validated by a pilot plant. Then the operability and performance of considered configurations is compared at steady state condition. This comparison reveals 1.2% and 6% enhancement in the methane conversion and CO2 consumption in fluidized-bed tri-reformer reactor, respectively, which mainly result from the fact that fluidized-bed reactor presents more effective temperature management and smaller pressure drop in comparison with the fixed-bed reactor. An increase in methane conversion, hydrogen yield and CO2 consumption as well as a decline in hot spot temperature in the catalytic bed shows the superiority of fluidized-bed tri-reformer reactor for producing synthesis gas.

[1]  A. Mitsos,et al.  Optimal design and operation of a natural gas tri-reforming reactor for DME synthesis , 2009 .

[2]  J. Fierro,et al.  New catalytic routes for syngas and hydrogen production , 1996 .

[3]  Krzysztof Gosiewski,et al.  Effect of the intraparticle mass transport limitations on temperature profiles and catalytic performance of the reverse-flow reactor for the partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas , 1999 .

[4]  M. Baerns,et al.  Catalytic oxidative coupling of methane—reaction engineering aspects and process schemes , 1995 .

[5]  Xiao Feng,et al.  Industrial emergy evaluation for hydrogen production systems from biomass and natural gas , 2009 .

[6]  G. Froment,et al.  Synthesis gas production from natural gas in a fixed bed reactor with reversed flow , 1996 .

[7]  V. Choudhary,et al.  Energy efficient conversion of methane to syngas over NiO-MgO solid solution , 2000 .

[8]  Antonie A. C. M. Beenackers,et al.  Intrinsic kinetics of the gas-solid Fischer-Tropsch and water gas shift reactions over a precipitated iron catalyst , 2000 .

[9]  L. Pino,et al.  Performance evaluation of a solid oxide fuel cell coupled to an external biogas tri-reforming process , 2013 .

[10]  C. Y. Wen,et al.  Estimation of bubble diameter in gaseous fluidized beds , 1975 .

[11]  Mohammad Reza Rahimpour,et al.  Optimization of tri-reformer reactor to produce synthesis gas for methanol production using differential evolution (DE) method , 2011 .

[12]  A. Heinzel,et al.  Reforming of natural gas—hydrogen generation for small scale stationary fuel cell systems , 2002 .

[13]  P. Sánchez,et al.  Methane tri-reforming over a Ni/β-SiC-based catalyst: Optimizing the feedstock composition , 2013 .

[14]  Huiquan Li,et al.  Tri-reforming of methane to syngas over Ni/Al2O3 — Thermal distribution in the catalyst bed , 2007 .

[15]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Sorption-enhanced reaction process with reactive regeneration , 2002 .

[16]  Gilbert F. Froment,et al.  Simulation of the catalytic partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas , 1996 .

[17]  A. Gupta,et al.  Characteristics of syngas from co-gasification of polyethylene and woodchips , 2011 .

[18]  Young-Soon Baek,et al.  Tri-reforming of CH4 using CO2 for production of synthesis gas to dimethyl ether , 2003 .

[19]  David L. Trimm,et al.  The combustion of methane on platinum—alumina fibre catalysts—I: Kinetics and mechanism , 1980 .

[20]  K. Tomishige.  Syngas production from methane reforming with CO2/H2O and O2 over NiO–MgO solid solution catalyst in fluidized bed reactors , 2004 .

[21]  J. C. Schouten,et al.  Design of adiabatic fixed-bed reactors for the partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas. Application to production of methanol and hydrogen-for-fuel-cells , 2001 .

[22]  V. Choudhary,et al.  CO2 reforming of methane combined with steam reforming or partial oxidation of methane to syngas over NdCoO3 perovskite-type mixed metal-oxide catalyst , 2006 .

[23]  Aacm Beenackers,et al.  Intra-particle diffusion limitations in low-pressure methanol synthesis , 1990 .

[24]  Chunshan Song,et al.  Tri-reforming : A new process for reducing CO2 emissions , 2001 .

[25]  D. Trimm,et al.  Alternative catalyst bed configurations for the autothermic conversion of methane to hydrogen , 1996 .

[26]  Thomas Sandahl Christensen,et al.  Recent developments in autothermal reforming and pre-reforming for synthesis gas production in GTL applications , 2003 .

[27]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[28]  I. Dybkjaer,et al.  Tubular reforming and autothermal reforming of natural gas — an overview of available processes , 1995 .

[29]  Lanny D. Schmidt,et al.  Catalytic partial oxidation of natural gas to syngas , 1995 .

[30]  Huiquan Li,et al.  Preparation of Ni/MgxTi1 − xO catalysts and investigation on their stability in tri-reforming of methane , 2007 .

[31]  Islam Ahmed,et al.  Evolution of syngas from cardboard gasification , 2009 .