Everolimus Exposure as a Predictor of Toxicity in Renal Cell Cancer Patients in the Adjuvant Setting: Results of a Pharmacokinetic Analysis for SWOG S0931 (EVEREST), a Phase III Study (NCT01120249)

Background: S0931 is assessing recurrence-free survival in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients randomized to receive everolimus (EVE) versus placebo for one year following nephrectomy. Due to a higher than expected dropout rate, we assessed EVE trough levels in the adjuvant setting to evaluate the relationship between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity. Methods: Patients received 10 mg daily EVE for nine 6-week cycles. Pre-dose whole blood samples were collected pre-cycle 2 and pre-cycle 3 and analyzed for EVE. Patients with pre-cycle 2 and/or pre-cycle 3 EVE results were used in the analysis. Patients were segregated into quartiles (Q) based on EVE levels and logistic regression was used to model the most common adverse event outcomes using EVE trough as a predictor. Hazard and odds ratios were adjusted for age, BMI and performance status. Results: A total of 467 patients were included in this analysis. Quartiles normalized to an EVE dose of 10 mg/day were < 9.0, 9.0–12.9, 12.9–22.8, and > 22.8 ng/mL, respectively. EVE trough levels increased with increasing age (p < 0.001). Furthermore, EVE trough levels were higher in men than women (19.4 versus 15.4 ng/mL, p = 0.01). Risk of grade 2 + triglycerides was increased in Q2 and Q3 vs Q1 (OR = 2.08; p = 0.02 and OR = 2.63; p = 0.002). Risk of grade 2 + rash was increased in Q2 and Q4 vs Q1 (OR = 2.99; p = 0.01 and OR = 2.90; p = 0.02). There was also an increased risk of any grade 3 + tox in Q2 vs Q1 (OR = 1.71; p = 0.05). Conclusions: We identified significant gender and age-related differences in EVE trough levels in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for RCC. Furthermore, our analysis identified significant associations between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity.

[1]  R. Motzer,et al.  Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  P. Marquet,et al.  Towards therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus in cancer? Results of an exploratory study of exposure‐effect relationship , 2017, Pharmacological research.

[3]  T. Yamasaki,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Everolimus in Relation to Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2016, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[4]  J. Patard,et al.  Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-Risk Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Manola,et al.  Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[6]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Meta-analysis of stomatitis in clinical studies of everolimus: incidence and relationship with efficacy , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  X. Pivot,et al.  Impact of everolimus blood concentration on its anti-cancer activity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma , 2014, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[8]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Relationship between everolimus exposure and safety and efficacy: meta-analysis of clinical trials in oncology. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[9]  Razelle Kurzrock,et al.  Phase I study evaluating the combination of lapatinib (a Her2/Neu and EGFR inhibitor) and everolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) in patients with advanced cancers: South West Oncology Group (SWOG) Study S0528 , 2013, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[10]  I. Durán,et al.  Emergent toxicities associated with the use of mTOR inhibitors in patients with advanced renal carcinoma , 2010, Anti-cancer drugs.

[11]  R. Motzer,et al.  Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[12]  V. Mabasa,et al.  The Role of Therapeutic Monitoring of Everolimus in Solid Organ Transplantation , 2005, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[13]  Heinz Schmidli,et al.  Everolimus Therapeutic Concentration Range Defined from a Prospective Trial with Reduced-Exposure Cyclosporine in De Novo Kidney Transplantation , 2004, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[14]  J. Kovarik,et al.  Exposure-response relationships for everolimus in de novo kidney transplantation: defining a therapeutic range. , 2002, Transplantation.

[15]  J. Kovarik,et al.  Longitudinal assessment of everolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients over the first post‐transplant year: Pharmacokinetics, exposure‐response relationships, and influence on cyclosporine , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.