High-Performance Work Systems, Corporate Social Performance and Employee Outcomes: Exploring the Missing Links

High-performance work systems (HPWS)-performance research has dominated innovative human resource management studies for two decades. However, mainstream HPWS research has paid little attention to employees’ perceptions of HPWS, or to the relationship between HPWS and corporate social performance (CSP). The influence of CSP on employee outcomes such as organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) has thus been similarly neglected. This paper seeks to investigate these missing links in literature using data collected from a sample of 700 employees in China. The findings demonstrate that HPWS is positively related to HPWS satisfaction and employees’ perceptions of CSP. HPWS satisfaction fully mediates the relationship between HPWS and employees’ affective commitment (AC). There are multiple mediators between HPWS and OCB, indicating more complicated mechanisms through which HPWS leads to desired HR outcomes. Employees’ perceived CSP has a significant influence on HPWS satisfaction, AC and OCB, suggesting firms should place a premium on achieving a reputation as being socially responsible.

[1]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[2]  Seyed‐Mahmoud Aghazadeh,et al.  The high‐performance work system: is it worth using? , 2004 .

[3]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[4]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[5]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[6]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Sociological Perspectives On Social Psychology , 2009 .

[7]  Jean‐Pascal Gond,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Influence on Employees , 2010 .

[8]  Johngseok Bae,et al.  Human Resource Management in , 2004 .

[9]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Clare Kelliher,et al.  High commitment performance management: the roles of justice and trust , 2011 .

[11]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates? , 2000 .

[12]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research , 2005 .

[13]  J. Paauwe.  HRM and Performance: Achievements, Methodological Issues and Prospects , 2009 .

[14]  J. Paauwe,et al.  Institutional pressures and HRM: developing institutional fit , 2009 .

[15]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  A Tale of Two Methods , 2006 .

[16]  K. Chaudhuri.  A Discussion on HPWS Perception and Employee Behavior , 2009 .

[17]  Dora Scholarios,et al.  Employees and High-PerformanceWork Systems:Testinginside the Black Box , 2000 .

[18]  Jaap Paauwe,et al.  HRM and Performance: Achieving Long-Term Viability , 2004 .

[19]  D. Wood,et al.  STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1995 .

[20]  K. Law,et al.  High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective , 2007 .

[21]  T. Wall,et al.  On the validity of subjective measures of company performance , 2004 .

[22]  D. Guest.  Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda , 1997 .

[23]  M. Veldhoven,et al.  Cross-level effects of high-performance work practices on burnout: Two counteracting mediating mechanisms compared , 2009 .

[24]  Paul E. Spector.  Method Variance in Organizational Research , 2006 .

[25]  M. Canela,et al.  Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accounting for Endogeneity , 2010 .

[26]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[28]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[29]  David Guest,et al.  Human resource management - the workers' verdict , 1999 .

[30]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  The Human Resource ‒ Firm Performance Relationship: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges , 2008 .

[31]  N. Feather,et al.  Organizational citizenship behaviours in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values , 2004 .

[32]  K. Macky,et al.  Research and theory on high-performance work systems: progressing the high-involvement stream , 2009 .

[33]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications , 2006 .

[34]  P. Boxall,et al.  Strategy and Human Resource Management , 2002 .

[35]  S. P. Schappe,et al.  The influence of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and fairness perceptions on organizational citizenship behavior. , 1998, The Journal of psychology.

[36]  D. Guest.  Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers , 2011 .

[37]  Julian Barling,et al.  High-performance work systems and occupational safety. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  K. Chaudhuri.  An Empirical Quest for Linkages between HPWS and Employee Behaviors – a Perspective from the Non Managerial Employees in Japanese Organizations , 2009 .

[39]  O. C. Ferrell,et al.  Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits , 1999 .

[40]  J. Graham,et al.  Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  I. Maignan,et al.  Organizational citizenship and corporate citizenship: two constructs, one research theme? , 2003 .

[42]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework , 2006 .

[43]  R. Dalal.  A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  A. M. Francesco,et al.  The Relationship between the Three Components of Commitment and Employee Performance in China. , 2003 .

[45]  K. Macky,et al.  The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction effects , 2007 .

[46]  S. Wayne,et al.  Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior as Exchange , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  Mike Richardson,et al.  Partnership, High Performance Work Systems and Quality of Working Life , 2008 .

[49]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing perspectives of supervisors and subordinates across four international samples , 1999 .

[50]  David L. Deephouse.  To Be Different or to Be the Same? It's a Question (and a Theory) of Strategic Balance , 1998 .

[51]  Charles Koeber,et al.  Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay off , 1999 .

[52]  Chris Steyaert,et al.  HRM and Performance: A Plea for Reflexivity in HRM Studies , 2009 .

[53]  S. Frenkel,et al.  Alternative pathways to high-performance workplaces , 2005 .

[54]  P. Wright,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management , 1992 .

[55]  John P. Meyer,et al.  HRM Practices and Organizational Commitment: Test of a Mediation Model , 2009 .

[56]  Riki Takeuchi,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Mechanisms Mediating between High-Performance Work Systems and the Performance of Japanese Organizations , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  Jie Shen,et al.  Effects of socially responsible human resource management on employee organizational commitment , 2011 .

[58]  Participation and Democracy at Work: Essays in Honour of Harvie Ramsay , 2005 .

[59]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in Organizations , 2004 .

[60]  J. Guthrie.  High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[61]  Wg Harley.  Hope or Hype? High Performance Work Systems , 2005 .

[62]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units , 2003 .

[63]  Anthony Hesketh,et al.  Beyond Measuring the Human Resources Management-Organizational Performance Link: Applying Critical Realist Meta-Theory , 2006 .

[64]  M. Alvesson,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies , 2011 .

[65]  D. Organ,et al.  A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF ATTITUDINAL AND DISPOSITIONAL PREDICTORS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR , 1995 .

[66]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[67]  Eunmi Chang.  Employees’ overall perception of HRM effectiveness , 2005 .

[68]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[69]  C. Distefano,et al.  Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher , 2009 .

[70]  Chris Brewster,et al.  In search of balance – managing the dualities of HRM: an overview of the issues , 2009 .

[71]  Marie Wiberg,et al.  Implications of range restriction : a comparison of two approaches for correcting correlation in range restriction. , 2009 .

[72]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[73]  Yaping Gong,et al.  High performance work system and collective OCB: a collective social exchange perspective , 2010 .

[74]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[75]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  The Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior: What Managers Need to Know , 2003 .

[76]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[77]  Allison W. Harrison,et al.  A General Measure of User Computing Satisfaction. , 1996 .

[78]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[79]  J. Godard.  A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm , 2004 .

[80]  A. Keegan,et al.  The Lack of Impact of Dissensus Inspired Analysis on Developments in the Field of Human Resource Management , 2006 .

[81]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[82]  P. Chatzoglou,et al.  Exploring the best HRM practices‐performance relationship: an empirical approach , 2009 .

[83]  Zhixing Xiao,et al.  High Commitment Work Systems in Chinese Organizations: A Preliminary Measure , 2006, Management and Organization Review.

[84]  James G. Combs,et al.  HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[85]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[86]  Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior as a critical link between HRM practices and service quality , 1996 .

[87]  David Holman,et al.  The essentials of the new workplace : a guide to the human impact of modern working practices , 2002 .

[88]  James Guthrie,et al.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: DOES INDUSTRY MATTER? , 2005 .

[89]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[90]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[91]  L. Dyer,et al.  Human resource strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go? , 1995 .

[92]  T. Keenoy.  22. Human Resource Management , 2009 .

[93]  Dane K. Peterson.  The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment , 2004 .

[94]  P. Wright,et al.  HRM and Performance: Achievements and Challenges , 2013 .

[95]  R. Phillips.  Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics , 2003 .

[96]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in research on human resource management and performance. Forthcoming (2005) - Human Resource Management Journal. , 2005 .

[97]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  Psychology in Organizations: The Social-Identity Approach , 2000 .

[98]  Chin-Ju Tsai,et al.  High performance work systems and organizational performance: an empirical study of Taiwan's semiconductor design firms , 2006 .

[99]  Paul Sparrow,et al.  Human Resource Management: the new agenda , 1998 .

[100]  Bing Bai,et al.  High-performance work systems in foreign subsidiaries of American multinationals: An institutional model , 2011 .

[101]  O. Ferrell,et al.  Measuring Corporate Citizenship in Two Countries: The Case of the United States and France , 2000 .

[102]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[103]  J. Paauwe,et al.  HRM and performance: What's next? , 2005 .

[104]  I. Stone,et al.  Exploring the potential of high performance work systems in SMEs , 2007 .

[105]  Jaap Paauwe,et al.  Employee Well‐Being and the HRM - Organizational Performance Relationship: A Review of Quantitative Studies , 2012 .

[106]  J. P. Near,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: ITS NATURE AND ANTECEDENTS , 1983 .

[107]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Organizational Commitment as predictor of Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 2011 .

[108]  D. Wood.  Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review , 2010 .

[109]  Sean A. Way.  High Performance Work Systems and Intermediate Indicators of Firm Performance Within the US Small Business Sector , 2002 .

[110]  A. Erez,et al.  The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.