Counterfactual thinking and decision making

Recent research on counterfactual thinking is discussed in terms of its implications for decision making. Against a backdrop of the functional benefits of counterfactual thinking, two distinct types of bias, one liberal and one conservative, are discussed. Counterfactuals may cause decision makers to become liberally biased (i.e., capricious) in terms of tactics, but conservatively biased (i.e., rigid) in terms of long-term strategy. That is, counterfactuals may lead to short-term corrective changes that are needless and costly, but they may also lead to long-term overconfidence, blinding the decision maker to possible beneficial strategic adjustments. Recent research on counterfactual thinking, which is inherently multidisciplinary, is reviewed in light of a theoretical structure that posits two mechanisms by which counterfactual effects occur: contrast effects and causal inferences.

[1]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence. , 1977 .

[2]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Hindsight and Causality , 1991 .

[3]  Matthew N. McMullen.  Affective Contrast and Assimilation in Counterfactual Thinking , 1997 .

[4]  N. Roese,et al.  Perceptions of Purple: Counterfactual and Hindsight Judgments at Northwestern Wildcats Football Games , 1997 .

[5]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[6]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Goals as Reference Points , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[8]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution. , 1995 .

[9]  N. Roese,et al.  Counterfactual Thinking: The Intersection of Affect and Function , 1997 .

[10]  P. Harris,et al.  Children's use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning , 1996, Cognition.

[11]  N. Roese,et al.  What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking , 1995 .

[12]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Counterfactual Thinking and Victim Compensation , 1986 .

[13]  Zeelenberg,et al.  Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and Disappointment. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[14]  L. Ross,et al.  Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  S. Fillenbaum.  Information amplified: Memory for counterfactual conditionals. , 1974 .

[16]  H. Arkes.  Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. , 1991 .

[17]  N. Roese.  The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking , 1994 .

[18]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives , 1996 .

[19]  D. Kahneman.  Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. , 1992 .

[20]  Christopher L. Martin,et al.  Relative deprivation and referent cognitions , 1983 .

[21]  Barbara A. Spellman,et al.  When Possibility Informs Reality , 1999 .

[22]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won , 1990 .

[23]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[24]  F. Crosby,et al.  A model of egoistical relative deprivation. , 1976 .

[25]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: implications for blame assignment , 1990 .

[26]  L. Sanna,et al.  Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence , 1996 .

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[28]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  When Timing Matters: The Influence of Temporal Distance on Consumers' Affective and Persuasive Responses , 1992 .

[29]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[30]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Strategies of information search in causal analysis , 1982 .

[31]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Consequences of regret aversion: 2. Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making , 1997 .

[32]  K. Markman,et al.  The Mental Simulation of Better and Worse Possible Worlds , 1993 .

[33]  David M. Messick,et al.  A Reverse Outcome Bias: The Influence of Multiple Reference Points on the Evaluation of Outcomes and Decisions , 1995 .

[34]  J. Baron,et al.  Outcome bias in decision evaluation. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  D. Hofstadter,et al.  Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1979 .

[36]  G. Wells,et al.  Mental Simulation of Causality , 1989 .

[37]  T. Gilovich,et al.  When Less Is More: Counterfactual Thinking and Satisfaction Among Olympic Medalists , 1995 .

[38]  L. Ross,et al.  Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information , 1980 .

[39]  James M. Olson,et al.  Counterfactuals, Causal Attributions, and the Hindsight Bias: A Conceptual Integration , 1996 .

[40]  Ruth M. J. Byrne,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Counterfactual Thinking about what Might Have Been , 1997 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[42]  Keith D. Markman,et al.  Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. , 1995 .

[43]  D. Kahneman.  Varieties of counterfactual thinking. , 1995 .

[44]  N. Ferguson,et al.  Virtual History: Alternatives And Counterfactuals , 1997 .

[45]  K. L. Marsh,et al.  Gaining Control through Counterfactual Thinking , 1999 .

[46]  R. Hastie,et al.  Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. , 1990 .

[47]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[48]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[49]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[50]  L. Sanna,et al.  Mood, self-esteem, and simulated alternatives: thought-provoking affective influences on counterfactual direction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  I. Ritov,et al.  Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options , 1997 .

[52]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The Justification of Organizational Performance. , 1983 .

[53]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Close-call counterfactuals and belief-system defenses: I was not almost wrong but I was almost right. , 1998 .

[54]  S. Sherman,et al.  The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Reasoning , 1996 .

[55]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight , 1982 .

[56]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[57]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.