Dissociating vestibular and somatosensory contributions to spatial orientation.

Inferring object orientation in the surroundings heavily depends on our internal sense of direction of gravity. Previous research showed that this sense is based on the integration of multiple information sources, including visual, vestibular (otolithic), and somatosensory signals. The individual noise characteristics and contributions of these sensors can be studied using spatial orientation tasks, such as the subjective visual vertical (SVV) task. A recent study reported that patients with complete bilateral vestibular loss perform similar as healthy controls on these tasks, from which it was conjectured that the noise levels of both otoliths and body somatosensors are roll-tilt dependent. Here, we tested this hypothesis in 10 healthy human subjects by roll tilting the head relative to the body to dissociate tilt-angle dependencies of otolith and somatosensory noise. Using a psychometric approach, we measured the perceived orientation, and its variability, of a briefly flashed line relative to the gravitational vertical (SVV). Measurements were taken at multiple body-in-space orientations (-90 to 90°, steps of 30°) and head-on-body roll tilts (30° left ear down, aligned, 30° right ear down). Results showed that verticality perception is processed in a head-in-space reference frame, with a systematic SVV error that increased with larger head-in-space orientations. Variability patterns indicated a larger contribution of the otolith organs around upright and a more substantial contribution of the body somatosensors at larger body-in-space roll tilts. Simulations show that these findings are consistent with a statistical model that involves tilt-dependent noise levels of both otolith and somatosensory signals, confirming dynamic shifts in the weights of sensory inputs with tilt angle.

[1]  T Haslwanter,et al.  The Role of Somatosensory Input for the Perception of Verticality , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  R T Verrillo,et al.  Vibrotactile thresholds for hairy skin. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Bernhard J. M. Hess,et al.  Influence of dynamic tilts on the perception of earth-vertical , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  H. Mittelstaedt A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical , 1983, Naturwissenschaften.

[5]  J. V. Van Gisbergen,et al.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Rosalie M. Uchanski,et al.  Human discrimination of rotational velocities , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  C. Bockisch,et al.  Head roll dependent variability of subjective visual vertical and ocular counterroll , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  H. Haes,et al.  Perception of gravity-vertical as a function of head and trunk position , 1968, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie.

[9]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Evidence of somatic graviception from new and classical investigations. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[11]  V. Nougier,et al.  Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Thomas Brandt,et al.  General vestibular testing , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Hermann Aubert,et al.  Eine scheinbare bedeutende Drehung von Objecten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach rechts oder links , 1861, Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin.

[14]  A. D. Van Beuzekom,et al.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. , 2000 .

[15]  D Straumann,et al.  Roll-dependent modulation of the subjective visual vertical: contributions of head- and trunk-based signals. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  C. Bockisch,et al.  Dissociated hysteresis of static ocular counterroll in humans. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Marousa Pavlou,et al.  Effect of semicircular canal stimulation on the perception of the visual vertical. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Laurence R. Young,et al.  Perception of the Body in Space: Mechanisms , 2011 .

[20]  F. Mast,et al.  The effect of water immersion on postural and visual orientation. , 1999, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[21]  W Pieter Medendorp,et al.  Sensory substitution in bilateral vestibular a-reflexic patients , 2015, Physiological reports.

[22]  H SCHOENE,et al.  ON THE ROLE OF GRAVITY IN HUMAN SPATIAL ORIENTATION. , 1964, Aerospace medicine.

[23]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Human sensitivity to vertical self-motion , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  H. Mittelstaedt,et al.  Somatic graviception , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[25]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Marion Trousselard,et al.  Contribution of tactile and interoceptive cues to the perception of the direction of gravity. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Body-tilt and visual verticality perception during multiple cycles of roll rotation. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[29]  L. Harris,et al.  Multisensory determinants of orientation perception: task‐specific sex differences , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth , 1999, Vision Research.

[31]  Fred Mast,et al.  Perceived body position and the visual horizontal , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[32]  D Straumann,et al.  Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  W Pieter Medendorp,et al.  Multisensory Processing in Spatial Orientation: An Inverse Probabilistic Approach , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  E. Wagenmakers A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  What Silly Postures Tell Us about the Brain , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[37]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[38]  Ulf Rosenhall The vestibular sensory regions in man : a morphological study , 1974 .

[39]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[40]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[41]  D. Angelaki,et al.  Vestibular system: the many facets of a multimodal sense. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[42]  M. Guerraz,et al.  Head Orientation Involvement in Assessment of the Subjective Vertical during Whole Body Tilt , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[43]  Jan A M Van Gisbergen,et al.  Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  U Rosenhall,et al.  Vestibular Macular Mapping in Man , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.