Effects of Semen Processing on Sperm Function: Differences between Swim-Up and Density Gradient Centrifugation

Purpose Andrology research has evolved notoriously in the latest years, particularly since male factor contribution to couple infertility has been undoubtedly demonstrated. However, sperm function investigations results are sometimes contradictory, probably as a result of the use of different sperm processing techniques. In this work, we underwent a systematic functional comparison of human sperm samples simultaneously processed by swim-up and density gradient centrifugation, which are the preferred sperm processing methods used in basic and clinical laboratories. Materials and Methods To compare functional characteristics of sperm isolated by swim-up and density gradient centrifugation followed by incubation at different times under capacitating conditions. Results Semen samples processed in parallel by these two procedures resulted in sperm preparations with significant differences in redox state, spontaneous intracellular calcium oscillations, hyperactivation, protein tyrosine phosphorylation, and acrosome reaction responsivity to calcium ionophore. Such differences showed time-dependent specific patterns for spontaneous intracellular calcium oscillations, hyperactivation and protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Sperm retrieved by density gradient centrifugation showed more hyperactivation and tyrosine phosphorylation than swim-up sperm, suggesting a higher degree of capacitation. Conclusions Our results account for functional differences observed in spermatozoa processed with these two methods and therefore may contribute to a better interpretation of outcomes obtained in different laboratories as well as to improve experimental designs aimed to study sperm physiology and fertility potential.

[1]  F. Gode,et al.  The Effects of Microfluidic Sperm Sorting, Density Gradient and Swim-up Methods on Semen Oxidation Reduction Potential. , 2020, Urology journal.

[2]  F. Larrea,et al.  Proteomic characterization of human sperm plasma membrane‐associated proteins and their role in capacitation , 2020, Andrology.

[3]  E. Baldi,et al.  Sperm selection with density gradient centrifugation and swim up: effect on DNA fragmentation in viable spermatozoa , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Gabriela Hernández-Silva,et al.  Proteins from male and female reproductive tracts involved in sperm function regulation , 2019, Zygote.

[5]  M. Buffone,et al.  Molecular Basis of Human Sperm Capacitation , 2018, Front. Cell Dev. Biol..

[6]  L. Aguila,et al.  Sperm capacitation pretreatment positively impacts bovine intracytoplasmic sperm injection , 2017, Molecular reproduction and development.

[7]  H. Uemura,et al.  Effect of density gradient centrifugation on reactive oxygen species in human semen , 2017, Systems biology in reproductive medicine.

[8]  F. Larrea,et al.  Luteinizing hormone modulates intracellular calcium, protein tyrosine phosphorylation and motility during human sperm capacitation. , 2017, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[9]  M. Chirinos,et al.  Modulation of Human Sperm Capacitation by Progesterone, Estradiol, and Luteinizing Hormone , 2017, Reproductive Sciences.

[10]  Ying-pu Sun,et al.  Semen preparation methods and sperm telomere length: density gradient centrifugation versus the swim up procedure , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Y. Morimoto,et al.  Combination of density gradient centrifugation and swim-up methods effectively decreases morphologically abnormal sperms , 2016, The Journal of reproduction and development.

[12]  A. Agarwal,et al.  MiOXSYS: a novel method of measuring oxidation reduction potential in semen and seminal plasma. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  M. Martinelli,et al.  Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation , 2015, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

[14]  A. Geater,et al.  Comparison of hyaluronan binding assay scores of spermatozoa using swim-up techniques and density gradient centrifugation. , 2015, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[15]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Contemporary evidence on the physiological role of reactive oxygen species in human sperm function , 2015, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[16]  O. José,et al.  Measuring intracellular Ca2+ changes in human sperm using four techniques: conventional fluorometry, stopped flow fluorometry, flow cytometry and single cell imaging. , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[17]  M. Chehrazi,et al.  Evaluation of conventional semen parameters, intracellular reactive oxygen species, DNA fragmentation and dysfunction of mitochondrial membrane potential after semen preparation techniques: a flow cytometric study , 2013, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[18]  D. Upadhya,et al.  Sperm processing by swim-up and density gradient is effective in elimination of sperm with DNA damage , 2012, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[19]  R. Lafuente,et al.  Use of high-magnification microscopy for the assessment of sperm recovered after two different sperm processing methods. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  Organización Mundial de la Salud WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen , 2010 .

[21]  J. Auger,et al.  WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen , 2010 .

[22]  G. Ricci,et al.  Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[23]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Reactive oxygen species as an independent marker of male factor infertility. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  F. Larrea,et al.  Biological Effects of Recombinant Human Zona Pellucida Proteins on Sperm Function1 , 2006, Biology of reproduction.

[25]  L. Björndahl,et al.  Contamination by seminal plasma factors during sperm selection. , 2005, Journal of andrology.

[26]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Comparative study on density gradients and swim-up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa. , 2005, Asian journal of andrology.

[27]  H. Breitbart Intracellular calcium regulation in sperm capacitation and acrosomal reaction , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[28]  C. Gagnon,et al.  Regulation of protein-tyrosine phosphorylation and human sperm capacitation by reactive oxygen derivatives. , 1997, Free radical biology & medicine.

[29]  R. Aitken,et al.  Redox regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation in human spermatozoa and its role in the control of human sperm function. , 1995, Journal of cell science.