Guidelines for Gating Flow Cytometry Data for Immunological Assays.

"Gating" refers to the selection of successive subpopulations of cells for analysis in flow cytometry. It is usually performed manually, based on expert knowledge of cell characteristics. However, there can be considerable disagreement in how gates should be applied, even between individuals experienced in the field. While clinical software often automates gating, and some guidelines do exist (especially for clinical assays), there are no comprehensive guidelines across the various types of immunological assays performed using flow cytometry. Here we attempt to provide such guidelines, focused on the most general and pervasive types of gates, why they are important, and what recommendations can be made regarding their use. We do so through the display of example data, collected by academic, government, and industry representatives. These guidelines should be of value to both novice and experienced flow cytometrists analyzing a wide variety of immunological assays.

[1]  M. Jaimes,et al.  A harmonized approach to intracellular cytokine staining gating: Results from an international multiconsortia proficiency panel conducted by the Cancer Immunotherapy Consortium (CIC/CRI) , 2013, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[2]  Holden T Maecker,et al.  Flow cytometry controls, instrument setup, and the determination of positivity , 2006, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[3]  R. Hoffman,et al.  Pulse Width for Particle Sizing , 2009, Current protocols in cytometry.

[4]  Mario Roederer,et al.  Increased immunofluorescence sensitivity using 532 nm laser excitation , 2007, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[5]  J. P. McCoy,et al.  Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  A. Gerber,et al.  1994 revised guidelines for the performance of CD4+ T-cell determinations in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections , 1994 .

[7]  Holden T Maecker,et al.  Maximizing the Retention of Antigen Specific Lymphocyte Function after Cryopreservation , 2001 .

[8]  M. Andersen,et al.  Elimination of erroneous results in flow cytometry caused by antibody binding to Fc receptors on human monocytes and macrophages , 2016, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[9]  J F Leary,et al.  Doublet discrimination in DNA cell-cycle analysis. , 2001, Cytometry.

[10]  H. Maecker,et al.  Optimization of whole blood antigen-specific cytokine assays for CD4(+) T cells. , 2000, Cytometry.

[11]  Greg Finak,et al.  Optimizing transformations for automated, high throughput analysis of flow cytometry data , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  Laurie Lamoreaux,et al.  Amine reactive dyes: an effective tool to discriminate live and dead cells in polychromatic flow cytometry. , 2006, Journal of immunological methods.

[13]  Brian H. Mayall,et al.  Guidelines for implementation of clinical DNA cytometry , 1993 .

[14]  James Wood,et al.  Flow cytometry histograms: Transformations, resolution, and display , 2008, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[15]  F. Mandy,et al.  Guidelines for performing single-platform absolute CD4+ T-cell determinations with CD45 gating for persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. , 2003, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[16]  B. Becher,et al.  The end of gating? An introduction to automated analysis of high dimensional cytometry data , 2016, European journal of immunology.

[17]  A. Bar-Or,et al.  Effects of Blood Transportation on Human Peripheral Mononuclear Cell Yield, Phenotype and Function: Implications for Immune Cell Biobanking , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  J. Margolick,et al.  Comparison of interlaboratory variation in absolute T‐cell counts by single‐platform and optimized dual‐platform methods , 2009, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[19]  J. Martin,et al.  Time: a new parameter for kinetic measurements in flow cytometry. , 1980, Science.

[20]  L O Henderson,et al.  Model system evaluating fluorescein-labeled microbeads as internal standards to calibrate fluorescence intensity on flow cytometers. , 1989, Cytometry.

[21]  R. Nussenblatt,et al.  Standardizing immunophenotyping for the Human Immunology Project , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[22]  L. Ben-Porat,et al.  Harmonization guidelines for HLA-peptide multimer assays derived from results of a large scale international proficiency panel of the Cancer Vaccine Consortium , 2009, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[23]  J V Watson.  Time, a quality-control parameter in flow cytometry. , 1987, Cytometry.

[24]  H. Maecker,et al.  Selecting fluorochrome conjugates for maximum sensitivity , 2004, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[25]  Dawn M. E. Bowdish,et al.  An Introduction to Automated Flow Cytometry Gating Tools and Their Implementation , 2015, Front. Immunol..

[26]  R. Goldberg,et al.  Circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates are an early marker of acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  Compensation of Signal Spillover in Suspension and Imaging Mass Cytometry , 2018, Cell systems.

[28]  Julie G. Burel,et al.  An Integrated Workflow To Assess Technical and Biological Variability of Cell Population Frequencies in Human Peripheral Blood by Flow Cytometry , 2017, The Journal of Immunology.

[29]  M. Altfeld,et al.  Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays , 2005, BMC Immunology.

[30]  V. Maino,et al.  Standardization and optimization of multiparameter intracellular cytokine staining , 2008, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[31]  Mario Roederer,et al.  A new “Logicle” display method avoids deceptive effects of logarithmic scaling for low signals and compensated data , 2006, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[32]  C Bruce Bagwell,et al.  Sometimes simpler is better: VLog, a general but easy‐to‐implement log‐like transform for cytometry , 2016, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[33]  D. Sutherland,et al.  The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. , 1996, Journal of hematotherapy.

[34]  O. Wagner-Ballon,et al.  ICCS/ESCCA Consensus Guidelines to detect GPI‐deficient cells in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) and related Disorders Part 3 – Data Analysis, Reporting and Case Studies , 2018, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[35]  Cliburn Chan,et al.  Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry. , 2014, Journal of immunological methods.

[36]  Mario Roederer,et al.  flowClean: Automated identification and removal of fluorescence anomalies in flow cytometry data , 2016, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[37]  R. Koup,et al.  Intracellular cytokine optimization and standard operating procedure , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[38]  M Roederer,et al.  Spectral compensation for flow cytometry: visualization artifacts, limitations, and caveats. , 2001, Cytometry.