Event-related TMS over the right posterior parietal cortex induces ipsilateral visuo-spatial interference

The right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is implicated in visuo-spatial processing, as illustrated by patients with visuo-spatial neglect, but the precise time-course of its contribution is still an open question. In the present study we assessed whether single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can interfere with the performance of normal subjects in a standard visuo-spatial task. Participants had to perform a landmark task while TMS was applied over the right PPC, the homologue region in the left hemisphere or the right primary motor cortex. Stimulation was time-locked to the stimulus presentation with a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) varying between 50 and 200 ms. Our results indicate that TMS interfered mainly with the visuo-spatial task when applied over the right PPC at an early stage (50 ms post-stimulus). The interference effect of single-pulse TMS in the present visuo-spatial processing is revealed by a processing cost for ipsilateral targets. These results are in agreement with neuropsychological and brain imaging studies showing a right hemispheric dominance in visuo-spatial processing but add crucial information about the time-course of visuo-spatial processing within the right PPC.

[1]  P. Astikainen,et al.  Cortical and subcortical visual event‐related potentials to oddball stimuli in rabbits , 2000, Neuroreport.

[2]  R. Andersen,et al.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  M J Brammer,et al.  Hemispheric preference in visuospatial processing: A complementary approach with fMRI and lesion studies , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[4]  A. Milner,et al.  An Investigation of Hemispatial Neglect Using the Landmark Task , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  P M Rossini,et al.  Left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces contralesional extinction in patients with unilateral right brain damage. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Verbal-Response and Manual-Response Versions of the Milner Landmark Task: Normative Data , 2000, Cortex.

[7]  H. Steinmetz,et al.  Craniocerebral topography within the international 10-20 system. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Early visual processing in neglect patients: A study with steady-state VEPs , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Filippo Brighina,et al.  Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects , 2000, Neuroreport.

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  Human motor evoked responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Perceptual and Response Bias in Unilateral Neglect: Two Modified Versions of the Milner Landmark Task , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  J. Winn,et al.  Brain , 1878, The Lancet.

[13]  Georg Kerkhoff,et al.  Spatial hemineglect in humans , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.

[14]  P M Rossini,et al.  Time-dependent activation of parieto-frontal networks for directing attention to tactile space. A study with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses in right-brain-damaged patients with extinction. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Magnetic stimulation studies of visual cognition , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  B. Anderson,et al.  A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  A. Milner,et al.  Residual perceptual distortion in recovered hemispatial neglect , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  K. Heilman,et al.  Ipsilesional Versus Contralesional Neglect Depends on Attentional Demands , 2000, Cortex.

[19]  S. Bandinelli,et al.  Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  E Corthout,et al.  Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[21]  K. D. Singh,et al.  Co‐registration of cortical magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Neuroreport.

[22]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Manifestation of scotomas created by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human visual cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Milner,et al.  To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  J. Marshall,et al.  Within- and Between-Task Dissociations in Visuo-Spatial Neglect: A Case Study , 1995, Cortex.