Event-related TMS over the right posterior parietal cortex induces ipsilateral visuo-spatial interference
暂无分享,去创建一个
E. Olivier | B. de Gelder | G. Pourtois | Y. Vandermeeren | G Pourtois | Y Vandermeeren | E Olivier | B de Gelder
[1] P. Astikainen,et al. Cortical and subcortical visual event‐related potentials to oddball stimuli in rabbits , 2000, Neuroreport.
[2] R. Andersen,et al. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.
[3] M J Brammer,et al. Hemispheric preference in visuospatial processing: A complementary approach with fMRI and lesion studies , 2000, Human brain mapping.
[4] A. Milner,et al. An Investigation of Hemispatial Neglect Using the Landmark Task , 1995, Brain and Cognition.
[5] P M Rossini,et al. Left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces contralesional extinction in patients with unilateral right brain damage. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[6] Edoardo Bisiach,et al. Verbal-Response and Manual-Response Versions of the Milner Landmark Task: Normative Data , 2000, Cortex.
[7] H. Steinmetz,et al. Craniocerebral topography within the international 10-20 system. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[8] D. Spinelli,et al. Early visual processing in neglect patients: A study with steady-state VEPs , 1996, Neuropsychologia.
[9] Filippo Brighina,et al. Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects , 2000, Neuroreport.
[10] M. Hallett,et al. Human motor evoked responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[11] Edoardo Bisiach,et al. Perceptual and Response Bias in Unilateral Neglect: Two Modified Versions of the Milner Landmark Task , 1998, Brain and Cognition.
[12] J. Winn,et al. Brain , 1878, The Lancet.
[13] Georg Kerkhoff,et al. Spatial hemineglect in humans , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.
[14] P M Rossini,et al. Time-dependent activation of parieto-frontal networks for directing attention to tactile space. A study with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses in right-brain-damaged patients with extinction. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[15] Alan Cowey,et al. Magnetic stimulation studies of visual cognition , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[16] B. Anderson,et al. A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[17] A. Milner,et al. Residual perceptual distortion in recovered hemispatial neglect , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[18] K. Heilman,et al. Ipsilesional Versus Contralesional Neglect Depends on Attentional Demands , 2000, Cortex.
[19] S. Bandinelli,et al. Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[20] E Corthout,et al. Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Neuroreport.
[21] K. D. Singh,et al. Co‐registration of cortical magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Neuroreport.
[22] S. Shimojo,et al. Manifestation of scotomas created by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human visual cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[23] A. Milner,et al. To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects , 1992, Neuropsychologia.
[24] J. Rothwell,et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[25] J. Marshall,et al. Within- and Between-Task Dissociations in Visuo-Spatial Neglect: A Case Study , 1995, Cortex.