Gender bending: auditory cues affect visual judgements of gender in biological motion displays

[1]  S. Shimojo,et al.  When Sound Affects Vision: Effects of Auditory Grouping on Visual Motion Perception , 2001, Psychological science.

[2]  A. Billard,et al.  Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Éva M. Bankó,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[5]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Multi-sensory integration of spatio-temporal segmentation cues: one plus one does not always equal two , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Retrieving Information from Human Movement Patterns , 2008 .

[7]  Mazyar Fallah,et al.  Adaptation of gender derived from biological motion , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  A. Saygin.  Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[11]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Sound alters visual motion perception , 1997, Nature.

[12]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Correlated changes in perceptions of the gender and orientation of ambiguous biological motion figures , 2008, Current Biology.

[13]  Kazuyoshi Takayama,et al.  Holographic interferometric visualization of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability induced by cylindrical shock waves , 1999 .

[14]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain , 1996, Current Biology.

[15]  Gabriele Lohmann,et al.  Auditory what, where, and when: a sensory somatotopy in lateral premotor cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  Robert J. Logan,et al.  Perception of acoustic source characteristics: walking sounds. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for area V2 involvement in the reduction of subjective contour tilt aftereffects by binocular rivalry , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  P. Holcomb,et al.  In: Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events. , 2007 .

[19]  J. Cutting,et al.  Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Elizabeth A. Strand,et al.  Auditory–visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception , 1999 .

[21]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[22]  N. Troje.  Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[23]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[24]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Auditory Adaptation in Voice Perception , 2008, Current Biology.

[25]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Pierre Fonlupt,et al.  Listening to a walking human activates the temporal biological motion area , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  D. Burr,et al.  Audio-visual integration in the perception of tap dancing , 2007 .

[29]  Yousuke Kawachi,et al.  Presentation of a Visual Nearby Moving Object Alters Stream/Bounce Event Perception , 2006, Perception.

[30]  G. Mather,et al.  Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.