Three-Channel Correlation Analysis: A New Technique to Measure Instrumental Noise of Digitizers and Seismic Sensors

This article describes a new method to estimate (1) the self-noise as a function of frequency of three-channel, linear systems and (2) the relative transfer functions between the channels, based on correlation analysis of recordings from a common, coherent input signal. We give expressions for a three-channel model in terms of power spectral densities. The method is robust, compared with the conven- tional two-channel approach, as both the self-noise and the relative transfer functions are extracted from the measurements only and do not require a priori information about the transfer function of each channel. We use this technique to measure and model the self-noise of digitizers and to identify the frequency range in which the digitizer can be used without precaution. As a consequence the method also reveals under which conditions the interpretation of data may be biased by the recording system. We apply the technique to a Quanterra Q4120 datalogger and to a Network of Autonomously Recording Seismographs (NARS) datalogger. At a sampling rate of 20 samples/sec, the noise of the Q4120 digitizer is modeled by superposition of a flat, 23.6-bit spectrum and a 24.7-bit spectrum with 1/f 1.55 noise. For the NARS datalogger the noise level is modeled by superposition of a 20.8-bit flat spectrum and a 23.0-bit spectrum with 1/f 1.0 noise. The measured gain ratios between the digi- tizers in the Q4120 datalogger, smoothed over a tenth of a decade between 0.01 Hz and 8 Hz for data sampled with 20 samples/sec, are within 1.6% (or 0.14 dB) of the values given by the manufacturer. Finally, we show an example of seismic background noise observations at station HGN as recorded by both an STS-1 and a STS-2 sensor. Between 0.01 and 0.001 Hz the vertical STS-2 noise levels are 10-15 dB above the STS-1 observations. The Quanterra Q4120 digitizer noise model enables us to exclude the contribution of the digitizer noise to be responsible for this difference.

[1]  J. Peterson,et al.  Observations and modeling of seismic background noise , 1993 .

[2]  P. Lognonné,et al.  The effects of the atmospheric pressure changes on seismic signals or how to improve the quality of a station , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Bonnie C. Baker.  HOW TO GET 23 BITS OF EFFECTIVE RESOLUTION FROM YOUR 24-BIT CONVERTER , 1997 .

[4]  Yun‐tai Chen,et al.  International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology , 2004 .

[5]  William Hung Kan Lee,et al.  International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology , 2002 .

[6]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Calibration of seismometers using ground noise , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[8]  L. Gary Holcomb.  A Numerical Study of Some Potential Sources of Error in Side-by-Side Seismometer Evaluations , 1990 .

[9]  Wayne C. Crawford,et al.  Identifying and Removing Tilt Noise from Low-Frequency (! 0.1 Hz) Seafloor Vertical Seismic Data , 2000 .

[10]  L. Gary Holcomb,et al.  A Direct Method for Calculating Instrument Noise Levels in Side-by-Side Seismometer Evaluations , 1989 .

[11]  Eleonore Stutzmann,et al.  GEOSCOPE Station Noise Levels , 2000 .

[12]  Fukao,et al.  Earth's background free oscillations , 1998, Science.

[13]  Geneviève Roult,et al.  Analysis of ‘background’ free oscillations and how to improve resolution by subtracting the atmospheric pressure signal , 2000 .

[14]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Free software helps map and display data , 1991 .

[15]  P. Welch.  The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[16]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .

[17]  W. R. Bennett,et al.  Spectra of quantized signals , 1948, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[18]  R. Macià,et al.  The Broadband Seismic Station CADI (Túnel del Cadí, Eastern Pyrenees), Part II: Long-Period Variations of Background Noise , 2002 .

[19]  W. Zürn,et al.  On noise reduction in vertical seismic records below 2 mHz using local barometric pressure , 1995 .

[20]  Jonathan Berger,et al.  Ambient Earth noise: A survey of the Global Seismographic Network , 2004 .

[21]  T. S. McDonald.  Modified Noise Power Ratio testing of high resolution digitizers , 1994 .

[22]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  Quantization noise spectra , 1990, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[23]  Jeannot Trampert,et al.  Comparative study of superconducting gravimeters and broadband seismometers STS-1/Z in seismic and subseismic frequency bands. , 1997 .

[24]  Peter Bormann,et al.  IASPEI New Manual of seismological observatory practice(NMSOP) , 2002 .

[25]  Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig,et al.  What Can Superconducting Gravimeters Contribute to Normal-Mode Seismology? , 2003 .

[26]  Peter Bormann,et al.  New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice , 2002 .

[27]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[28]  Michael Mar. Korn.  Ten years of German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN) , 2002 .

[29]  Jacques Hinderer,et al.  The search for the Slichter mode: comparison of noise levels of superconducting gravimeters and investigation of a stacking method , 2003 .

[30]  Jon Berger,et al.  Parametric analysis and calibration of the STS-1 seismometer of the IRIS/IDA Seismographic Network , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[31]  R. Parker,et al.  Seismic system calibration: 2. Cross-spectral calibration using random binary signals , 1979, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.