International brachytherapy practice patterns: a survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG).

PURPOSE To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). METHODS AND MATERIALS A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB-IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. RESULTS A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB-IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB-IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB-IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB-IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) (p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials.

[1]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  R G Dale,et al.  The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Akila N Viswanathan,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy: a survey of the American Brachytherapy Society. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  B. Erickson,et al.  The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  K. Ogawa,et al.  Combination external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: analysis of dose and fractionation schedule. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  B. Erickson,et al.  Patterns of brachytherapy practice for patients with carcinoma of the cervix (1996-1999): a patterns of care study. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Mitchell Morris,et al.  Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  D. Gaffney,et al.  Does the entire uterus need to be treated in cancer of the cervix? Role of adaptive brachytherapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Recommendations for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy of cervix cancer: the GYN GEC ESTRO Working Group point of view: in regard to Nag et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;60:1160-1172). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  S. Bentzen,et al.  Radiobiological Aspects of Brachytherapy in the Era of 3-Dimensional Imaging , 2011 .

[11]  A. Viswanathan,et al.  Current controversies in high‐dose‐rate versus low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer , 2006, Cancer.

[12]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Gynecologic radiation therapy: Novel approaches to image-guidance and management , 2011 .

[13]  R. Pötter,et al.  Practice patterns of radiotherapy in cervical cancer among member groups of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  D. Petereit,et al.  Literature analysis of high dose rate brachytherapy fractionation schedules in the treatment of cervical cancer: is there an optimal fractionation schedule? , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  J. Fowler The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.