Linking family hardship to children's lives.

The impact of drastic income loss on children is mediated by a number of family adaptations, including the shift toward more labor-intensive households and altered relationships. Using newly developed codes on parenting behavior during the Great Depression, this study investigates the role of parental behavior (rejecting, nonsupportive) in linking economic hardship to children's lives in the Oakland Growth Study. The results extend beyond those reported in Children of the Great Depression by showing that economic hardship adversely influenced the psychosocial well-being of girls, but not boys, by increasing the rejecting behavior of fathers. The parenting behavior of mothers did not vary significantly by income loss. In addition, the rejecting influence of hard-pressed fathers was more pronounced in relation to less attractive daughters, as judged by physical features. Attractive daughters were not likely to be maltreated by their fathers, no matter how severe the economic pressure. These outcomes on family mediation and conditional effects underscore the importance of viewing economic decline in relation to both the child's characteristics and parenting behavior. An understanding of the effects of economic decline in children's lives requires knowledge of parent and child behavior within the family and life course.

[1]  G. Elder.  Life course dynamics : trajectories and transitions, 1968-1980 , 1987 .

[2]  J. Belsky,et al.  The determinants of parenting: a process model. , 1984, Child development.

[3]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Hardship in Lives: Depression Influences from the 1930s to Old Age in Postwar America , 1984 .

[4]  Jack Block,et al.  Lives Through Time , 1983 .

[5]  J. Liker,et al.  Economic hardship and marital relations in the 1930s. , 1983, American sociological review.

[6]  G. Patterson.  Stress: A change agent for family process. , 1983 .

[7]  William Kessen,et al.  History, theory, and methods , 1983 .

[8]  D. Eichorn.  Present and Past in Middle Life , 1982 .

[9]  Physical Attractiveness and Blood Pressure , 1982 .

[10]  E. Werner,et al.  Vulnerable, But Invincible , 1982 .

[11]  M. Lieberman,et al.  The stress process. , 1981, Journal of health and social behavior.

[12]  G. Sorell,et al.  14 – The Role of Physical Attractiveness as a Contributor to Individual Development , 1981 .

[13]  A. Kadushin,et al.  Child abuse--an interactional event , 1981 .

[14]  A. Rabin,et al.  Further explorations in personality , 1981 .

[15]  D. Blyth,et al.  Entry into early adolescence: the impact of school structure, puberty, and early dating on self-esteem. , 1979, American sociological review.

[16]  J. Kagan.  Family Experience and the Child's Development. , 1979 .

[17]  R. Eme.  Sex differences in childhood psychopathology: a review. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  L. Harper,et al.  Child Effects on Adults , 1977 .

[19]  Daniel Bar-Tal,et al.  Physical attractiveness and its relationship to sex-role stereotyping , 1976 .

[20]  Richard W. Coan,et al.  The Optimal Personality , 1974 .

[21]  K. Dion,et al.  Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children's transgressions. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  William J. Goode,et al.  Force and Violence in the Family. , 1971 .

[23]  G. Elder.  Appearance and education in marriage mobility. , 1969, American sociological review.

[24]  F. Nye,et al.  Class And Conformity , 1969 .

[25]  R. Lynd,et al.  Middletown in Transition: A Study in Cultural Conflicts , 1937 .