Anisotropic reaction field correction for long-range electrostatic interactions in molecular dynamics simulations.

Reaction-field (RF) methods have been extensively used in molecular dynamics simulations to efficiently compute long-range electrostatic interactions. They assume a continuous dielectric medium outside a certain cutoff, which has shown to be a reasonable approximation in many cases. However, lattice sum or fast multipole methods are nowadays often used instead, which treat long-range interactions explicitly but may introduce different artefacts. In the following work, the major issue of RFs is addressed, i.e., their inability to account for inhomogeneity even in heterogenous environments (e.g., membranes or protein binding pockets). By using a first-order Laplace series expansion of the dielectric permittivity on the cutoff sphere, local anisotropic effects can be described in a simple form. It is shown that the resulting boundary-value problem cannot be solved analytically, but instead a well-behaved approximative anisotropic reaction field (ARF) is introduced, which preserves coordinate invariance and approaches the standard RF solution for homogeneous systems. The comparison of RF to the state-of-the-art particle-particle particle-mesh (P3M) method shows a difference in the orientation of molecules close to the interface between two different dielectrics (water/chloroform). It was found that the ARF leads to a correction of the orientational distribution toward the P3M reference for planar and spherical interfaces.

[1]  Maria M. Reif,et al.  Toward the correction of effective electrostatic forces in explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations: restraints on solvent-generated electrostatic potential and solvent polarization , 2015, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts.

[2]  Michael Hofmann,et al.  Comparison of scalable fast methods for long-range interactions. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  David L Mobley,et al.  Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[4]  Daniel Potts,et al.  Parallel Three-Dimensional Nonequispaced Fast Fourier Transforms and Their Application to Particle Simulation , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[5]  Markus Christen,et al.  Architecture, implementation and parallelisation of the GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[6]  Wilfred F van Gunsteren,et al.  Calculation of relative free energies for ligand-protein binding, solvation, and conformational transitions using the GROMOS software. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[7]  Wilfred F van Gunsteren,et al.  On the Calculation of the Dielectric Permittivity and Relaxation of Molecular Models in the Liquid Phase. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[8]  Holger Dachsel,et al.  Corrected article: "An error-controlled fast multipole method" [J. Chem. Phys. 131, 244102 (2009)]. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[9]  C. Holm,et al.  P3M algorithm for dipolar interactions. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[10]  Tim N. Heinz,et al.  Combining the lattice-sum and reaction-field approaches for evaluating long-range electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[11]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Isotropic periodic sum: a method for the calculation of long-range interactions. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force‐field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6 , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  Paul Tavan,et al.  A fast multipole method combined with a reaction field for long-range electrostatics in molecular dynamics simulations: The effects of truncation on the properties of water , 2003 .

[14]  O. Steinhauser,et al.  The dielectric self-consistent field method. II. Application to the study of finite range effects , 2001 .

[15]  W. V. van Gunsteren,et al.  Comparison of different schemes to treat long‐range electrostatic interactions in molecular dynamics simulations of a protein crystal , 2001, Proteins.

[16]  A Kusumi,et al.  Molecular dynamics generation of nonarbitrary membrane models reveals lipid orientational correlations. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[17]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of a Polyalanine Octapeptide under Ewald Boundary Conditions: Influence of Artificial Periodicity on Peptide Conformation , 2000 .

[18]  R. Fox,et al.  Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[19]  Andrew E. Torda,et al.  The GROMOS biomolecular simulation program package , 1999 .

[20]  M. Berkowitz,et al.  Dielectric constant of water at high electric fields: Molecular dynamics study , 1999 .

[21]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Effect of artificial periodicity in simulations of biomolecules under Ewald boundary conditions: a continuum electrostatics study. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[22]  M. Deserno,et al.  How to mesh up Ewald sums. I. A theoretical and numerical comparison of various particle mesh routines , 1998, cond-mat/9807099.

[23]  M. Deserno,et al.  HOW TO MESH UP EWALD SUMS. II. AN ACCURATE ERROR ESTIMATE FOR THE PARTICLE-PARTICLE-PARTICLE-MESH ALGORITHM , 1998, cond-mat/9807100.

[24]  G. Sutmann Structure formation and dynamics of water in strong external electric fields , 1998 .

[25]  Martin Head-Gordon,et al.  PERIODIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS AND THE FAST MULTIPOLE METHOD , 1997 .

[26]  B. Luty,et al.  Space-time correlated reaction field: A stochastic dynamical approach to the dielectric continuum , 1997 .

[27]  L. Greengard,et al.  A new version of the Fast Multipole Method for the Laplace equation in three dimensions , 1997, Acta Numerica.

[28]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  Calculating Electrostatic Interactions Using the Particle−Particle Particle−Mesh Method with Nonperiodic Long-Range Interactions , 1996 .

[29]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations , 1995 .

[30]  Martin Head-Gordon,et al.  Derivation and efficient implementation of the fast multipole method , 1994 .

[31]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  A molecular dynamics simulation study of chloroform , 1994 .

[32]  B. Wood,et al.  MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS STUDY OF THE DIELECTRIC-CONSTANT OF WATER UNDER HIGH-PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS , 1994 .

[33]  T. Darden,et al.  The effect of long‐range electrostatic interactions in simulations of macromolecular crystals: A comparison of the Ewald and truncated list methods , 1993 .

[34]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[35]  Bernard Pettitt,et al.  Peptides in ionic solutions: A comparison of the Ewald and switching function techniques , 1991 .

[36]  Leslie Greengard,et al.  A fast algorithm for particle simulations , 1987 .

[37]  Piet Hut,et al.  A hierarchical O(N log N) force-calculation algorithm , 1986, Nature.

[38]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[39]  Martin Neumann,et al.  Dipole moment fluctuation formulas in computer simulations of polar systems , 1983 .

[40]  Andrew W. Appel,et al.  An Efficient Program for Many-Body Simulation , 1983 .

[41]  D. Heyes,et al.  Electrostatic potentials and fields in infinite point charge lattices , 1981 .

[42]  J. Perram,et al.  Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. I. Lattice sums and dielectric constants , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[43]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[44]  D. D. Yue,et al.  Theory of Electric Polarization , 1974 .

[45]  J. A. Barker,et al.  Monte Carlo studies of the dielectric properties of water-like models , 1973 .

[46]  Z. Birnbaum,et al.  One-Sided Confidence Contours for Probability Distribution Functions , 1951 .

[47]  W. Rudin Uniqueness theory of Hermite series , 1951 .

[48]  N. Smirnov Table for Estimating the Goodness of Fit of Empirical Distributions , 1948 .

[49]  W. Feller On the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Limit Theorems for Empirical Distributions , 1948 .

[50]  L. Onsager Electric Moments of Molecules in Liquids , 1936 .

[51]  Christian Holm,et al.  How to Mesh up Ewald Sums , 2000 .

[52]  A. N. Shiryayev,et al.  15. On The Empirical Determination of A Distribution Law , 1992 .

[53]  W. M. Haynes CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1990 .

[54]  C. Brooks Computer simulation of liquids , 1989 .

[55]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration , 1981 .

[56]  R. Hockney The potential calculation and some applications , 1970 .

[57]  P. P. Ewald Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale , 1921 .