Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis.

The aim of this study was to compare image quality, level of diagnostic confidence and interobserver agreement in assessment of carotid stenosis with contrast enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in comparison with 2D time of flight MR angiography (2D TOF MRA). 60 carotid arteries in 30 patients were examined by three observers. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were assessed on the basis of a visual analogue scale. Interobserver variability was assessed with the help of intraclass correlation coefficient. Median values on the visual analogue scale for image quality and diagnostic confidence were higher for CE MRA compared with 2D TOF MRA for all three observers. Higher intraclass correlation values were recorded for interobserver variability for CE MRA compared with 2D TOF MRA both for visual estimation of carotid stenosis as well as for measurement of carotid stenosis on the basis of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria. CE MRA provides better image quality, higher level of diagnostic confidence and more interobserver agreement compared with 2D TOF MRA.

[1]  S. Kollias,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: a feasibility study , 1999, Neuroradiology.

[2]  W. Nitz,et al.  Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Diagnostic Accuracy and Inter-Observer Variability Compared With Selective Catheter Angiography , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[3]  R. Vanninen,et al.  Mild carotid artery atherosclerosis: assessment by 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, with reference to intravascular ultrasound imaging and contrast angiography. , 1999, Stroke.

[4]  C. Bartolozzi,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Atherosclerotic Internal Carotid Stenosis as the Noninvasive Imaging Modality in Revascularization Decision Making , 2003, Stroke.

[5]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain: comparison of acquisition techniques in healthy volunteers. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  E M Haacke,et al.  Carotid plaque formation and its evaluation with angiography, ultrasound, and MR angiography , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  J. Eidt,et al.  Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial? , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  Markus Horn,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[9]  J C Froment,et al.  Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  C. Langlotz,et al.  Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: evaluation of non-breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  F. Korosec,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  H. Jäger,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients with carotid artery stenosis: comparison of two different techniques with an unenhanced 2D time-of-flight sequence , 2000, Neuroradiology.

[14]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[15]  R. Edelman,et al.  Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? , 1995, Stroke.

[16]  G. Schroth,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.