Large Diameter Triaxial Tests on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Granular Subbases

The estimation of strength and stiffness of reinforced aggregates is very important for the design and construction of reinforced unpaved/paved road sections. This paper presents the experimental results from static and cyclic triaxial tests carried out on granular subbase samples reinforced with multiple layers of geogrid reinforcement. Aggregates of different size ranges were mixed in calculated proportions by weight to obtain the gradation specified for rural roads. Triaxial samples of 300 mm diameter and 600 mm height were prepared using this sampled aggregate. The strength and stiffness characteristics of this aggregate reinforced with geogrids at different elevations were determined from static and cyclic triaxial tests. Triaxial tests were also carried out on geocell encased aggregates, and the results are compared. From the experimental results it is observed that reinforced systems carried more stresses than unreinforced systems at the same strain level. The beneficial effect increased with increase in the quantity of reinforcement, whereas for geocell reinforcement, the advantage was evident only at higher strains. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.

[1]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Large-scale triaxial testing of greywacke rockfill , 1993 .

[2]  Erxiang Song,et al.  A large triaxial investigation of the stress-path-dependent behavior of compacted rockfill , 2012 .

[3]  K. G. Sharma,et al.  Testing and Modeling Two Rockfill Materials , 2003 .

[4]  William F. Anderson,et al.  Behavior of Railroad Ballast under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading , 2008 .

[5]  Ennio M. Palmeira,et al.  Large scale tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads subjected to surface maintenance , 2010 .

[6]  A. Fourie,et al.  Performance of geotextile-reinforced clay samples in undrained triaxial tests , 1986 .

[7]  R. J. Fannin,et al.  Field Observations on Stabilization of Unpaved Roads with Geosynthetics , 1996 .

[8]  G. Madhavi Latha,et al.  Effects of reinforcement form on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand , 2007 .

[9]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils , 1993 .

[10]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Study of Railway Ballast Behavior under Cyclic Loading , 2010 .

[11]  J. A. Charles,et al.  The influence of confining pressure on the shear strength of compacted rockfill , 1980 .

[12]  Asha M. Nair,et al.  Taming of large diameter triaxial setup , 2012 .

[13]  Bhanitiz Aursudkij,et al.  A Laboratory Study of Railway Ballast Behaviour: Under Traffic Loading and Tamping Maintenance , 2009 .

[14]  E. Yanful,et al.  Dynamic Properties and Influence of Clay Mineralogy Types on the Cyclic Strength of Mine Tailings , 2013 .

[15]  A. M. Oskoorouchi,et al.  Effect of geotextile reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of sand , 2000 .

[16]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  LABORATORY PROPERTIES OF A SOFT MARINE CLAY REINFORCED WITH WOVEN AND NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILES , 1991 .

[17]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Geotechnical properties of ballast and the role of geosynthetics in rail track stabilisation , 2006 .

[18]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Static and Cyclic Triaxial Testing of Ballast and Subballast , 2005 .