An automated segmentation methodology for quantifying immunoreactive puncta number and fluorescence intensity in tissue sections

A number of human brain diseases have been associated with disturbances in the structure and function of cortical synapses. Answering fundamental questions about the synaptic machinery in these disease states requires the ability to image and quantify small synaptic structures in tissue sections and to evaluate protein levels at these major sites of function. We developed a new automated segmentation imaging method specifically to answer such fundamental questions. The method takes advantage of advances in spinning disk confocal microscopy, and combines information from multiple iterations of a fluorescence intensity/morphological segmentation protocol to construct three-dimensional object masks of immunoreactive (IR) puncta. This new methodology is unique in that high- and low-fluorescing IR puncta are equally masked, allowing for quantification of the number of fluorescently-labeled puncta in tissue sections. In addition, the shape of the final object masks highly represents their corresponding original data. Thus, the object masks can be used to extract information about the IR puncta (e.g., average fluorescence intensity of proteins of interest). Importantly, the segmentation method presented can be easily adapted for use with most existing microscopy analysis packages.

[1]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[2]  C R Houser,et al.  Comparative localization of two forms of glutamic acid decarboxylase and their mRNAs in rat brain supports the concept of functional differences between the forms , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Lund,et al.  The hierarchical development of monkey visual cortical regions as revealed by the maturation of parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons. , 1996, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[4]  Pat Levitt,et al.  Analysis of complex brain disorders with gene expression microarrays: schizophrenia as a disease of the synapse , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  D. Lewis,et al.  Postnatal development of parvalbumin‐ and GABA transporter‐immunoreactive axon terminals in monkey prefrontal cortex , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  D. Lewis,et al.  Parvalbumin‐immunoreactive axon terminals in macaque monkey and human prefrontal cortex: Laminar, regional, and target specificity of type I and type II synapses , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  D. Selkoe Alzheimer's Disease Is a Synaptic Failure , 2002, Science.

[8]  M. Erlander,et al.  Different distributions of GAD65 and GAD67 mRNAS suggest that the two glutamate decarboxylases play distinctive functional roles , 1993, Journal of neuroscience research.

[9]  Clifford M. Babbey,et al.  Performance comparison between the high‐speed Yokogawa spinning disc confocal system and single‐point scanning confocal systems , 2005, Journal of microscopy.

[10]  A. McAllister,et al.  Immunocytochemistry and quantification of protein colocalization in cultured neurons , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[11]  R. Fitzsimonds,et al.  Automated criteria-based selection and analysis of fluorescent synaptic puncta , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  P. Shaw Comparison of Widefield/Deconvolution and Confocal Microscopy for Three-Dimensional Imaging , 2006 .

[13]  K. Sobue,et al.  Determination of absolute protein numbers in single synapses by a GFP-based calibration technique , 2005, Nature Methods.

[14]  A. Privat,et al.  Comparative distribution of GAD65 and GAD67 mRNAs and proteins in the rat spinal cord supports a differential regulation of these two glutamate decarboxylases in vivo , 1995, Journal of neuroscience research.

[15]  F. Benes,et al.  Localization of cells preferentially expressing GAD(67) with negligible GAD(65) transcripts in the rat hippocampus. A double in situ hybridization study. , 1999, Brain research. Molecular brain research.

[16]  J. Swedlow,et al.  Evaluating performance in three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy , 2007, Journal of microscopy.

[17]  D. Lewis,et al.  Postnatal development of the cholecystokinin innervation of monkey prefrontal cortex , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  W. Webb,et al.  Background rejection and signal-to-noise optimization in confocal and alternative fluorescence microscopes. , 1994, Applied optics.

[19]  Jason R Swedlow,et al.  Measuring tubulin content in Toxoplasma gondii: A comparison of laser-scanning confocal and wide-field fluorescence microscopy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Z. Kam,et al.  Characterization of internalization and endosome formation of epidermal growth factor in transfected NIH-3T3 cells by computerized image- intensified three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  Allan R. Sampson,et al.  Effect of Chronic Antipsychotic Exposure on Astrocyte and Oligodendrocyte Numbers in Macaque Monkeys , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[22]  S. Eggan,et al.  Postnatal development of pre‐ and postsynaptic GABA markers at chandelier cell connections with pyramidal neurons in monkey prefrontal cortex , 2003, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  Mark F Bear,et al.  The mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  D. C. Sterio The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector , 1984, Journal of microscopy.

[25]  D A Agard,et al.  Temporal and spatial coordination of chromosome movement, spindle formation, and nuclear envelope breakdown during prometaphase in Drosophila melanogaster embryos , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  A. Zaitsev,et al.  Localization of calcium-binding proteins in physiologically and morphologically characterized interneurons of monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.