Assessing Human Judgment of Computationally Generated Swarming Behavior

Computer-based swarm systems, aiming to replicate the flocking behavior of birds, were first introduced by Reynolds in 1987. In his initial work, Reynolds noted that while it was difficult to quantify the dynamics of the behavior from the model, observers of his model immediately recognized them as a representation of a natural flock. Considerable analysis has been conducted since then on quantifying the dynamics of flocking/swarming behavior. However, no systematic analysis has been conducted on human identification of swarming. In this paper, we assess subjects’ assessment of the behavior of a simplified version of Reynolds’ model. Factors that affect the identification of swarming are discussed and future applications of the resulting models are proposed. Differences in decision times for swarming-related questions asked during the study indicate that different brain mechanisms may be involved in different elements of the behavior assessment task. The relatively simple but finely tunable model used in this study provides a useful methodology for assessing individual human judgment of swarming behavior.

[1]  Antonino Casile,et al.  Critical features for the recognition of biological motion. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[2]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Sensing, Understanding, and Shaping Social Behavior , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[3]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Sex differences in the perception of affective facial expressions: Do men really lack emotional sensitivity? , 2005, Cognitive Processing.

[4]  R. Gur,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in processing emotional expressions , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[6]  Hussein A. Abbass,et al.  Application of chaos measures to a simplified boids flocking model , 2015, Swarm Intelligence.

[7]  Thomas M. Antonsen,et al.  Continuum modeling of the equilibrium and stability of animal flocks , 2012, 1201.2694.

[8]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[9]  Leslie D. Servi,et al.  A Mathematical Approach to Gauging Influence by Identifying Shifts in the Emotions of Social Media Users , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[10]  D. Voyer,et al.  On the magnitude of laterality effects and sex differences in functional lateralities. , 1996, Laterality.

[11]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[12]  J F Thayer,et al.  Sex differences in judgement of facial affect: a multivariate analysis of recognition errors. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[13]  J. Toner,et al.  Flocks, herds, and schools: A quantitative theory of flocking , 1998, cond-mat/9804180.

[14]  Bruce T Clough UAV Swarming? So What are Those Swarms, What are the Implications, and How Do We Handle Them? , 2002 .

[15]  Huaglory Tianfield,et al.  Analysis of the Emergence in Swarm Model Based on Largest Lyapunov Exponent , 2011 .

[16]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[17]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  The classification of ‘fear’ from faces is associated with face recognition skill in women , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Swagatam Das,et al.  Chaotic Dynamics in Social Foraging Swarms—An Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[19]  Kenjiro Suzuki,et al.  Vortical structure and heat transfer enhancement in the wake behind a wing-type vortex generator in drag-reducing surfactant flow , 2002 .