Investigating the influence of social desirability on personality factor structure.

This study provides a comprehensive investigation into whether social desirability alters the factor structure of personality measures. The study brought together 4 large data sets wherein different organizational samples responded to different personality measures. This facilitated conducting 4 separate yet parallel investigations. Within each data set, individuals identified through a social desirability scale as responding in an honest manner were grouped together, and individuals identified as responding in a highly socially desirable manner were grouped together. Using various analyses, the fit of higher order factor structure models was compared across the 2 groups. Results were the same for each data set. Social desirability had little influence on the higher order factor structures that characterized the relationships among the scales of the personality measures.

[1]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[2]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Social desirability corrections in personality measurement : Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity , 1999 .

[3]  Judith M. Collins,et al.  Race, job applicants, and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Implications for Black psychology, industrial/organizational psychology, and the Five-Factor Theory. , 1998 .

[4]  Joseph G. Rosse,et al.  The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. , 1998 .

[5]  D. Ones,et al.  The Effects of Social Desirability and Faking on Personality and Integrity Assessment for Personnel Selection , 1998 .

[6]  J. Salgado The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. , 1996 .

[8]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Work and personality : Use of the NEO-PI-R in industrial/organisational psychology , 1996 .

[9]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Effects of Self-Presentation Strategies on Personality Profiles and their Structure , 1995 .

[10]  J. Levin,et al.  The five‐factor personality model in applied settings , 1994 .

[11]  Ann Marie Ryan,et al.  The Big Five in Personnel Selection: Factor Structure in Applicant and Nonapplicant Populations , 1993 .

[12]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[13]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[14]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[15]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[16]  J. Neuliep,et al.  Replication Research in the Social Sciences , 1991 .

[17]  Newell K. Eaton,et al.  Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities , 1990 .

[18]  John P. Campbell,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF THE ARMY SELECTION AND CLASSIFICATION PROJECT (PROJECT A) , 1990 .

[19]  Jeffrey J. Mchenry,et al.  PROJECT A VALIDITY RESULTS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDICTOR AND CRITERION DOMAINS , 1990 .

[20]  Robert Hogan,et al.  The construct validity of social desirability. , 1990 .

[21]  Ronald R. Holden,et al.  Three common social desirability scales: Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? , 1989 .

[22]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[23]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception , 1987 .

[24]  D. Paulhus Two-component models of socially desirable responding. , 1984 .

[25]  M. Browne,et al.  Cross-Validation Of Covariance Structures. , 1983, Multivariate behavioral research.

[26]  D. Paulhus Control of social desirability in personality inventories: Principal-factor deletion , 1981 .

[27]  P. Barber,et al.  Social desirability in the Eysenck Personality Inventory , 1981 .

[28]  G. C. Thornton,et al.  Fakability of an empirically derived selection instrument. , 1980, Journal of personality assessment.

[29]  G. Burger,et al.  Second order factors in the California Psychological Inventory. , 1977, Journal of personality assessment.

[30]  H. Eysenck,et al.  The determination of personality inventory factor patterns and intercorrelations by changes in real-life motivation. , 1971, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[31]  C. Orpen THE FAKABILITY OF THE EDWARDS PERSONAL PREFERENCE SCHEDULE IN PERSONNEL SELECTION , 1971 .

[32]  C. Bartlett,et al.  SOCIAL DESIRABILITY RESPONSE DIFFERENCES UNDER RESEARCH, SIMULATED SELECTION, AND FAKING INSTRUCTIONAL SETS , 1967 .

[33]  A. Heilbrun The Social Desirability Variable: Implications for Test Reliabilty and Validity , 1965 .

[34]  L. J. Stricker Acquiescence and Social Desirability Response Styles, Item Characteristics, and Conformity , 1963 .

[35]  Marvin D. Dunnette,et al.  A STUDY OF FAKING BEHAVIOR ON A FORCED‐CHOICE SELF‐DESCRIPTION CHECKLIST , 1962 .

[36]  Geoffrey M. Maruyama,et al.  Basics of structural equation modeling , 1997 .

[37]  D. Paulhus Measurement and control of response bias. , 1991 .

[38]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[39]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Applied psychology : an international review , 1989 .

[40]  A. Furnham Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation , 1986 .

[41]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Social desirability scales: More substance than style. , 1983 .

[42]  J. Orvik TO SEE OURSELVES AS OTHERS SEE US!: RELATIONS AMONG SELF-PERCEPTIONS, PEER-PERCEPTIONS, AND EXPECTED PEER-PERCEPTIONS OF PERSONALITY. , 1972 .

[43]  E. Megargee,et al.  The California psychological inventory handbook , 1972 .

[44]  Jack Block,et al.  The challenge of response sets , 1965 .

[45]  J. Lyons Psychology and the measure of man , 1963 .

[46]  W. Kirchner "Real-life" faking on the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule by sales applicants. , 1962 .

[47]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instruction. , 1959 .