Spectrophotometric assessment of leaf UV-B absorbing compounds and chemically determined total phenolic levels are strongly correlated

Investigations concerning the two major ecological roles of phenolics use different methods to quantify these compounds (phenolics as antiherbivores, Folin-Ciocalteu chemical assay; phenolics as UV-B screening pigments, UV-B absorbance). Yet, comparisons of the corresponding results are not possible, since an empirical correlation between the two methods is lacking. In the present study, significant regressions between total phenolic levels (chemically determined with the Folin-Ciocalteu method) and leaf UV-B absorbing capacity (assessed from simple absorbance measurements of methanolic extracts at 300 nm) were found in all seven plant species tested, yet interspecies differences in regression equations were evident. Provided that a standard curve between UV-absorbance versus total phenolic levels is established for each test plant, the latter could be predicted from the former. The UV-absorbance method is preferable because it is time-saving, simpler, and less costly. Given the strong regression between ...

[1]  J. Rozema,et al.  Nutrient availability influences UV-B sensitivity of Plantago lanceolata , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[2]  W. Bilger,et al.  Contribution of hydroxycinnamates and flavonoids to epidermal shielding of UV‐A and UV‐B radiation in developing rye primary leaves as assessed by ultraviolet‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence measurements , 2000 .

[3]  G. Grammatikopoulos,et al.  Site-dependent differences in transmittance and UV-B-absorbing capacity of isolated leaf epidermes and mesophyll in Urginea maritima (L.) Baker , 1999 .

[4]  J. Hunt,et al.  Nitrogen status affects UV-B sensitivity of cucumber , 1998 .

[5]  Y. Manetas,et al.  Trichome density and its UV-B protective potential are affected by shading and leaf position on the canopy , 1997 .

[6]  M. F. Choong What makes a leaf tough and how this affects the pattern of Castanopsis fissa leaf consumption by caterpillars , 1996 .

[7]  Thomas A. Day,et al.  Changes in UV‐B radiation screening effectiveness with leaf age in Rhododendron maximum , 1996 .

[8]  R. Dixon,et al.  Stress-Induced Phenylpropanoid Metabolism. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[9]  R. Bennett,et al.  Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[10]  Peter G. Waterman,et al.  Analysis of Phenolic Plant Metabolites , 1994 .

[11]  T. Day,et al.  Relating UV-B radiation screening effectiveness of foliage to absorbing-compound concentration and anatomical characteristics in a diverse group of plants , 1993, Oecologia.

[12]  Yiannis Manetas,et al.  Ultraviolet‐B radiation absorbing capacity of leaf hairs , 1992 .

[13]  D. Herms,et al.  The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend , 1992, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[14]  M. Tevini,et al.  THE PROTECTIVE FUNCTION OF THE EPIDERMAL LAYER OF RYE SEEDLINGS AGAINST ULTRAVIOLET‐B RADIATION , 1991 .

[15]  N. Owen‐Smith,et al.  Resource availability hypothesis of plant antiherbivore defence tested in a South African savanna ecosystem , 1989, Nature.

[16]  John L. Harper,et al.  The value of a leaf , 1989, Oecologia.

[17]  A. Teramura,et al.  Effects of ultraviolet‐B irradiance on soybean. VI. Influence of phosphorus nutrition on growth and flavonoid content , 1985 .

[18]  A. Teramura,et al.  Effects of ultraviolet‐B radiation on plants during mild water stress. III. Effects on photosynthetic recovery and growth in soybean , 1984 .

[19]  P. Coley,et al.  HERBIVORY AND DEFENSIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TREE SPECIES IN A LOWLAND TROPICAL FOREST , 1983 .

[20]  Martyn M. Caldwell,et al.  Effects of ultraviolet-B irradiances on soybean. IV - Leaf ontogeny as a factor in evaluating ultraviolet-B irradiance effects on net photosynthesis , 1981 .

[21]  A. Teramura Effects of ultraviolet–B irradiances on soybean , 1980 .

[22]  Martyn M. Caldwell,et al.  Leaf epidermal transmittance of ultraviolet radiation and its implications for plant sensitivity to ulraviolet-radiation induced injury , 2004, Oecologia.

[23]  E. Levizou,et al.  Beneficial effects of enhanced UV-B radiation under field conditions: improvement of needle water relations and survival capacity of Pinus pinea L. seedlings during the dry Mediterranean summer , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[24]  John A. Lee,et al.  The responses of plant functional types to enhanced UV-B radiation. , 1999 .

[25]  J. Rozema,et al.  Effects of UV-B on secondary metabolites in Plants. , 1999 .

[26]  E. Levizou,et al.  The Effects of Enhanced UV-B Radiation on the Mediterranean Evergreen Sclerophyll Nerium oleander Depend on the Extent of Summer Precipitation , 1997 .

[27]  T. Day,et al.  Changes in growth and pigment concentrations with leaf age in pea under modulated UV‐B radiation field treatments , 1996 .

[28]  F. Dakora Plant flavonoids: biological molecules for useful exploitation , 1995 .

[29]  M. Tevini UV-B radiation and ozone depletion : effects on humans, animals, plants, microorganisms, and materials , 1993 .

[30]  E. Bernays,et al.  Herbivores and Plant Tannins , 1989 .

[31]  E. Wollenweber,et al.  Occurrence and distribution of free flavonoid aglycones in plants , 1981 .

[32]  R. Cates,et al.  TOWARD A GENERAL THEORY OF PLANT. ANTIHERBIVORE CHEMISTRY , 1976 .

[33]  J. Harborne Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis , 1973 .