International Test Results for Objective Lens Quality, Resolution, Spectral Accuracy and Spectral Separation for Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopes

As part of an ongoing effort to increase image reproducibility and fidelity in addition to improving cross-instrument consistency, we have proposed using four separate instrument quality tests to augment the ones we have previously reported. These four tests assessed the following areas: (1) objective lens quality, (2) resolution, (3) accuracy of the wavelength information from spectral detectors, and (4) the accuracy and quality of spectral separation algorithms. Data were received from 55 laboratories located in 18 countries. The largest source of errors across all tests was user error which could be subdivided between failure to follow provided protocols and improper use of the microscope. This truly emphasizes the importance of proper rigorous training and diligence in performing confocal microscopy experiments and equipment evaluations. It should be noted that there was no discernible difference in quality between confocal microscope manufactures. These tests, as well as others previously reported, will help assess the quality of confocal microscopy equipment and will provide a means to track equipment performance over time. From 62 to 97% of the data sets sent in passed the various tests demonstrating the usefulness and appropriateness of these tests as part of a larger performance testing regiment.

[1]  T. Jovin,et al.  FRET imaging , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Bechara Kachar,et al.  Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) of Fluorescence Tagged Proteins in Dendritic Spines of Cultured Hippocampal Neurons , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[3]  J. Swedlow,et al.  A workingperson's guide to deconvolution in light microscopy. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[4]  Enrico Gratton,et al.  Fluctuation correlation spectroscopy with a laser-scanning microscope: exploiting the hidden time structure. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Robert M Zucker,et al.  Reliability of confocal microscopy spectral imaging systems: Use of multispectral beads , 2007, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[6]  P Wahl,et al.  Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of a fluorescent transferrin internalized in the late transferrin endocytic compartment of living A431 cells: experiments. , 1997, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[7]  Serge Huant,et al.  High-resolution mapping of the three-dimensional point spread function in the near-focus region of a confocal microscope , 2007 .

[8]  Peter Shaw,et al.  Deconvolution in 3-D optical microscopy , 1994, The Histochemical Journal.

[9]  A. López,et al.  Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments under conditions of uniform disk illumination. Critical comparison of analytical solutions, and a new mathematical method for calculation of diffusion coefficient D. , 1988, Biophysical journal.

[10]  H. Hutter,et al.  Five‐colour in vivo imaging of neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  Yuval Garini,et al.  Spectral imaging: Principles and applications , 2006, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[12]  Carol J. Cogswell,et al.  A method for evaluating microscope objectives to optimize performance of confocal systems , 1990 .

[13]  James G McNally,et al.  Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) methods for visualizing protein dynamics in living mammalian cell nuclei. , 2004, Methods in enzymology.

[14]  Stelzer Contrast, resolution, pixelation, dynamic range and signal‐to‐noise ratio: fundamental limits to resolution in fluorescence light microscopy , 1998 .

[15]  J. Conchello,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging by deconvolution microscopy. , 1999, Methods.

[16]  S. Gibson,et al.  Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Steven S Vogel,et al.  Fanciful FRET , 2006, Science's STKE.

[18]  Martin E van Royen,et al.  Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to study nuclear protein dynamics in living cells. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[19]  R H Berg,et al.  Evaluation of spectral imaging for plant cell analysis , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[20]  P. Goodwin,et al.  Evaluating optical aberration using fluorescent microspheres: methods, analysis, and corrective actions. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[21]  D A Agard,et al.  Dispersion, aberration and deconvolution in multi‐wavelength fluorescence images , 1996, Journal of microscopy.

[22]  Fabio Beltram,et al.  Quantitative FRET Analysis With the E0GFP‐mCherry Fluorescent Protein Pair , 2009, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[23]  Jason R Swedlow,et al.  Live cell imaging using wide-field microscopy and deconvolution. , 2002, Cell structure and function.

[24]  Claire M. Brown,et al.  Resolution and Quality Control of Confocal Microscopy Optics: Measuring and Interpreting Point Spread Functions. , 2012 .

[25]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Practical limits of resolution in confocal and non‐linear microscopy , 2004, Microscopy research and technique.

[26]  James B. Pawley,et al.  Tutorial on Practical Confocal Microscopy and Use of the Confocal Test Specimen , 2006 .

[27]  Anne-Marie Girard,et al.  Quality assurance testing for modern optical imaging systems. , 2011, Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada.

[28]  Stephen A. Zahorian,et al.  Dual transmission model and related spectral content of the fetal heart sounds , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[29]  D. Piston,et al.  Fluorescent protein FRET: the good, the bad and the ugly. , 2007, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[30]  R. Juškaitis Measuring the Real Point Spread Function of High Numerical Aperture Microscope Objective Lenses , 2006 .

[31]  Claire M. Brown,et al.  Measuring and interpreting point spread functions to determine confocal microscope resolution and ensure quality control , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[32]  H. E. Keller,et al.  Objective Lenses for Confocal Microscopy , 2006 .

[33]  E. Elson,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and photobleaching recovery of multiple binding reactions. I. Theory and FCS measurements , 1983, Biopolymers.

[34]  E Gratton,et al.  Raster image correlation spectroscopy (RICS) for measuring fast protein dynamics and concentrations with a commercial laser scanning confocal microscope , 2008, Journal of microscopy.

[35]  J. Swedlow,et al.  Evaluating performance in three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy , 2007, Journal of microscopy.

[36]  S. Paddock,et al.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 1999, BioTechniques.

[37]  Elizabeth A Jares-Erijman,et al.  Imaging molecular interactions in living cells by FRET microscopy. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[38]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[39]  P. Wahl,et al.  Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of a fluorescent transferrin internalized in the late transferrin endocytic compartment of living A431 cells: theory. , 1997, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[40]  Horst Wallrabe,et al.  Chapter 22: Quantitation of protein-protein interactions: confocal FRET microscopy. , 2008, Methods in cell biology.

[41]  Rimas Juskaitis,et al.  Characterizing high-quality microscope objectives: a new approach , 1999, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[42]  Karl Garsha,et al.  Practical Confocal Microscopy , 2006 .

[43]  J. Pawley,et al.  The 39 steps: a cautionary tale of quantitative 3-D fluorescence microscopy. , 2000, BioTechniques.

[44]  Jeremy M Lerner,et al.  Wavelength and alignment tests for confocal spectral imaging systems , 2005, Microscopy research and technique.

[45]  Jeremy M Lerner,et al.  Calibration and validation of confocal spectral imaging systems , 2004, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[46]  Joachim Bergner,et al.  Handbuch der Mikroskopie , 1977 .

[47]  A. Genovesio,et al.  Three‐dimensional point spread function model for line‐scanning confocal microscope with high‐aperture objective , 2007, Journal of microscopy.

[48]  D. Agard,et al.  Determination of three-dimensional imaging properties of a light microscope system. Partial confocal behavior in epifluorescence microscopy. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Ammasi Periasamy,et al.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy imaging of live cell protein localizations , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[50]  J. Lerner Imaging spectrometer fundamentals for researchers in the biosciences—A tutorial , 2006, Cytometry Part A.

[51]  Jason R Swedlow,et al.  Quantitative fluorescence microscopy and image deconvolution. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.