On the nature of student defensiveness: theory and feedback from a software design course

Deeply challenging, educationally critical discipline content often resides in the realm of the existentially unfamiliar, that which is initially experienced as unknown--and unknowable. By definition, student encounters with this content lead to a rupture in knowing, and initiate an interval of confusion, which in turn engenders uncertainty and unease. Only by taking on uncertainty can one productively navigate the confusion in order to learn, and expand knowing to encompass the previously unknowable. Turning away from the uncertainty and unease disallows learning. The former is known as reflectiveness, the latter as defensiveness. This paper is written as part of an ongoing exploration into student learning in computing. The ongoing exploration is motivated by questions of how to engender a reflective response (which is required for transformative learning) among all students; or, among those students who do respond defensively, how to cultivate transition to reflectiveness. The exploration defines and sets context for the individual investigations; each investigation contributes to and refines the overarching conceptual framework of the ongoing exploration. This paper was undertaken in order to refine the overarching framework; it is intended to further clarify the conceptual infrastructure regarding defensiveness. In the process, the value of explanatory theory is confirmed for computing--and other--education.

[1]  A. Gurwitsch,et al.  The field of consciousness , 1964 .

[2]  H. Dreyfus,et al.  Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time. , 1990 .

[3]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning , 2005 .

[4]  Larrie Greenberg,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: Reaching for Excellence in Practice , 2005, Pediatrics.

[5]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the Clubhouse : Women in Computing by Allan Fisher , 2015 .

[6]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[7]  Ian Jackson,et al.  Threshold concepts in economics: a case study , 2006 .

[8]  Shirley Booth,et al.  On Phenomenography, Learning and Teaching , 1997 .

[9]  J. Dewey How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[10]  Leslie Schwartzman,et al.  A qualitative analysis of reflective and defensive student responses in a software engineering and design course , 2006, Baltic Sea '06.

[11]  T. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edition , 1970 .

[12]  J. Stein,et al.  The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, the Unabridged Edition , 1967 .

[13]  J. Loder The transforming moment: Understanding convictional experiences , 1981 .

[14]  J. Mezirow Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning , 1991 .

[15]  S. Segal,et al.  The Existential Conditions of Explicitness: an Heideggerian perspective , 1999 .

[16]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[17]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[18]  T. Barer-Stein Learning as a Process of Experiencing the Unfamiliar , 1987 .

[19]  Leslie Schwartzman,et al.  Student Defensiveness as a Threshold to Reflective Learning in Software Design , 2007, Informatics Educ..

[20]  Leslie Schwartzman Student transformative learning in software engineering and design: discontinuity (pre)serves meaning , 2007 .

[21]  Lilly Irani Understanding gender and confidence in CS course culture , 2004 .

[22]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[23]  Griselda Pollock,et al.  Thinking sociologically , 2007 .