Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: an evaluation on four continents

Wearable acceleration sensors are increasingly used for the assessment of free-living physical activity. Acceleration sensor calibration is a potential source of error. This study aims to describe and evaluate an autocalibration method to minimize calibration error using segments within the free-living records (no extra experiments needed). The autocalibration method entailed the extraction of nonmovement periods in the data, for which the measured vector magnitude should ideally be the gravitational acceleration (1 g); this property was used to derive calibration correction factors using an iterative closest-point fitting process. The reduction in calibration error was evaluated in data from four cohorts: UK (n = 921), Kuwait (n = 120), Cameroon (n = 311), and Brazil (n = 200). Our method significantly reduced calibration error in all cohorts (P < 0.01), ranging from 16.6 to 3.0 mg in the Kuwaiti cohort to 76.7 to 8.0 mg error in the Brazil cohort. Utilizing temperature sensor data resulted in a small nonsignificant additional improvement (P > 0.05). Temperature correction coefficients were highest for the z-axis, e.g., 19.6-mg offset per 5°C. Further, application of the autocalibration method had a significant impact on typical metrics used for describing human physical activity, e.g., in Brazil average wrist acceleration was 0.2 to 51% lower than uncalibrated values depending on metric selection (P < 0.01). The autocalibration method as presented helps reduce the calibration error in wearable acceleration sensor data and improves comparability of physical activity measures across study locations. Temperature ultization seems essential when temperature deviates substantially from the average temperature in the record but not for multiday summary measures.

[1]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Automatic Calibration of Body Worn Acceleration Sensors , 2004, Pervasive.

[2]  S. Brage,et al.  Physical Activity, Cardio-Respiratory Fitness, and Metabolic Traits in Rural Mexican Tarahumara , 2012, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[3]  Archana Singh-Manoux,et al.  Association Between Questionnaire- and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity: The Role of Sociodemographic Factors , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  Wouter Olthuis,et al.  Procedure for in-use calibration of triaxial accelerometers , 1997 .

[5]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Predicting Physical Activity Energy Expenditure Using Accelerometry in Adults From Sub‐Sahara Africa , 2009, Obesity.

[6]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Sedentary time in children: influence of accelerometer processing on health relations. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  Willem Van Mechelen,et al.  Reproducibility of a triaxial seismic accelerometer (DynaPort). , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Søren Brage,et al.  A method to compare new and traditional accelerometry data in physical activity monitoring , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM).

[10]  Reinhold Haux,et al.  Automatic self-calibration of body worn triaxial-accelerometers for application in healthcare , 2008, 2008 Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[11]  Xiaoji Niu,et al.  Fast Thermal Calibration of Low-Grade Inertial Sensors and Inertial Measurement Units , 2013, Sensors.

[12]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Urbanization, Physical Activity, and Metabolic Health in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[13]  Alexander Horsch,et al.  Separating Movement and Gravity Components in an Acceleration Signal and Implications for the Assessment of Human Daily Physical Activity , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  V. Stiles,et al.  Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Cheshire Sk Category 2 enhanced phenotyping at baseline assessment visit in last 100-150,000 participants , 2009 .

[16]  Michael Catt,et al.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  Emanuele Lindo Secco,et al.  A Real-Time and Self-Calibrating Algorithm Based on Triaxial Accelerometer Signals for the Detection of Human Posture and Activity , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[18]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[20]  Y. Manoli,et al.  Autocalibration of MEMS accelerometers , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[21]  Joss Langford,et al.  Assessing sedentary behavior with the GENEActiv: introducing the sedentary sphere. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Association between birth weight and visceral fat in adults. , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[23]  J. Wells,et al.  Cohort profile: the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study. , 2008, International journal of epidemiology.

[24]  Claudio R Nigg,et al.  Establishing and evaluating wrist cutpoints for the GENEActiv accelerometer in youth. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  Reinhold Haux,et al.  Performance comparison of accelerometer calibration algorithms based on 3D-ellipsoid fitting methods , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..