The effect of insoles on foot pain and daily activities

Background: Foot pain decreases individuals’ ability to perform daily activities. Insoles are often prescribed to reduce the pain which, in turn, may promote return to normal activities. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of insoles on foot pain and daily activities, and to investigate the relationship between individuals’ satisfaction with insoles and actual use of them. Study design: A 4-week pre–post intervention follow-up. Methods: Brief Pain Inventory, International Physical Activity Questionnaire and Lower Extremities Functional Status were used as outcome measures. Client Satisfaction with Device was used in the follow-up. Results: A total of 67 participants answered the questionnaires (81% women). Overall, a reduction in Pain Severity (p = 0.002) and Pain Interference (p = 0.008) was shown. Secondary analyses revealed a significant effect only in women. No changes in daily activities (Walking, p = 0.867; Total Physical Activity, p = 0.842; Lower Extremities Functional Status, p = 0.939) could be seen. There was no relation between Client Satisfaction with Device measures and duration of insole use. A difference in sex was shown; women scored higher than men on Pain Severity. Conclusion: Insoles reduce pain and pain interference with daily activities for women with foot pain. Satisfaction with the insoles is not a predictor of actual insole use. The effect of insoles on activity performance needs further study. Clinical relevance This study provides evidence for prescribing insoles to people with foot pain. Nonetheless, insoles are not enough to increase their physical activity level in the short term. Satisfaction with insoles and duration of use are not correlated and cannot be inferred from each other.

[1]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Use and Satisfaction with Prosthetic Devices Among Persons with Trauma-Related Amputations: A Long-Term Outcome Study , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  R. Fillingim,et al.  Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. , 2009, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[3]  B. Koes,et al.  Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation for Subacute Low Back Pain in Working-Age Adults: A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group , 2001, Spine.

[4]  L. Hermansson,et al.  Test–retest reliability of the Swedish version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey , 2014, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[5]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Validity of the Brief Pain Inventory for Use in Documenting the Outcomes of Patients With Noncancer Pain , 2004, The Clinical journal of pain.

[6]  S. Bandinelli,et al.  Epidemiology of hip and knee pain in a community based sample of Italian persons aged 65 and older. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[7]  Jill L Cook,et al.  Impact of chronic plantar heel pain on health-related quality of life. , 2008, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[8]  B. Wright Reasonable mean-square fit values , 1994 .

[9]  J. Sundquist,et al.  Physical activity, exercise and self-rated health: a population-based study from Sweden , 2008, BMC public health.

[10]  H. P. van der Ploeg,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire for Assessing Walking , 2010, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[11]  M. Nyska,et al.  The effect of insoles on the incidence and severity of low back pain among workers whose job involves long-distance walking , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[12]  C. Cleeland The Brief Pain Inventory User Guide , 2009 .

[13]  M. Dehghan,et al.  Seasonal Variation in Leisure-time Physical Activity Among Canadians , 2007, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[14]  Maria Hagströmer,et al.  The International Physical Activity Questionnaire modified for the elderly: aspects of validity and feasibility , 2010, Public Health Nutrition.

[15]  J. H. Walter,et al.  A patient satisfaction survey on prescription custom-molded foot orthoses. , 2004, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[16]  Ji-Hye Hwang,et al.  Randomized controlled trial for clinical effects of varying types of insoles combined with specialized shoes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the foot. , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[17]  P. Stratford,et al.  Quantifying Self-Report Measures' Overestimation of Mobility Scores Postarthroplasty , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[18]  Catherine B. Chan,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Weather Conditions on Physical Activity Participation Using Objective Measures , 2009, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[19]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  A. Heinemann,et al.  Validity evidence for a modified version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[21]  E. Laskowski,et al.  Effect of magnetic vs sham-magnetic insoles on nonspecific foot pain in the workplace: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 2005, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[22]  M. Jensen,et al.  Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. , 2004, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[23]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  The International Prevalence Study on Physical Activity: results from 20 countries , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[24]  M. Hagströmer Assessment of health-enhancing physical activity at population level , 2007 .

[25]  A. Lahad,et al.  Insoles for Prevention and Treatment of Back Pain: A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group , 2009, Spine.

[26]  L Demers,et al.  Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[27]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Swedish adults , 2006, Public Health Nutrition.

[28]  A. Heinemann,et al.  Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments , 2003, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[29]  S. Kaasa,et al.  The Norwegian brief pain inventory questionnaire: translation and validation in cancer pain patients. , 2002, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[30]  Henk van Dijk,et al.  A systematic review of the methodological quality and extent to which evaluation studies measure the usability of orthopaedic shoes , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[31]  J. Dawson,et al.  A year of foot and ankle orthotic provision for adults: prospective consultations data, with patient satisfaction survey. , 2008, The Foot.

[32]  Ronald C Plotnikoff,et al.  Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: a systematic review. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[33]  S. Crenshaw,et al.  Effects of Lateral-Wedged Insoles on Kinetics at the Knee , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  J. Basford,et al.  Shoe insoles in the workplace. , 1988, Orthopedics.