Validation and optimization of viral clearance in a downstream continuous chromatography setting

Continuous bioprocessing holds the potential to improve product consistency, accelerate productivity, and lower cost of production. However, switching a bioprocess from traditional batch to continuous mode requires surmounting business and regulatory challenges. A key regulatory requirement for all biopharmaceuticals is virus safety, which is assured through a combination of testing and virus clearance through purification unit operations. For continuous processing, unit operations such as capture chromatography have aspects that could be impacted by a change to continuous multicolumn operation, for example, do they clear viruses as well as a traditional batch single column. In this study we evaluate how modifying chromatographic parameters including the linear velocity and resin capacity utilization could impact virus clearance in the context of moving from a single column to multicolumn operation. A Design of Experiment (DoE) approach was taken with two model monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and two bacteriophages used as mammalian virus surrogates. The DoE enabled the identification of best and worst‐case scenario for virus clearance overall. Using these best and worst‐case conditions, virus clearance was tested in single column and multicolumn modes and found to be similar as measured by Log Reduction Values (LRV). The parameters identified as impactful for viral clearance in single column mode were predictive of multicolumn modes. Thus, these results support the hypothesis that the viral clearance capabilities of a multicolumn continuous Protein A system may be evaluated using an appropriately scaled‐down single mode column and equipment.

[1]  Marc Bisschops,et al.  The impact of continuous multicolumn chromatography on biomanufacturing efficiency , 2013 .

[2]  Daniel G Bracewell,et al.  Host cell protein adsorption characteristics during protein a chromatography , 2012, Biotechnology progress.

[3]  Fabien Rousset,et al.  Large-scale monoclonal antibody purification by continuous chromatography, from process design to scale-up. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[4]  Daniel Cummings,et al.  Integrated continuous production of recombinant therapeutic proteins , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  Ekta Mahajan,et al.  Improving affinity chromatography resin efficiency using semi-continuous chromatography. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  Konstantin B Konstantinov,et al.  White paper on continuous bioprocessing. May 20-21, 2014 Continuous Manufacturing Symposium. , 2015, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[7]  Alex Xenopoulos,et al.  A new, integrated, continuous purification process template for monoclonal antibodies: Process modeling and cost of goods studies. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[8]  Sarah A Johnson,et al.  Adapting viral safety assurance strategies to continuous processing of biological products , 2017, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  S. Lute,et al.  Phage passage after extended processing in small‐virus‐retentive filters , 2007, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[10]  Dimitrios I. Gerogiorgis,et al.  Economic Analysis of Integrated Continuous and Batch Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: A Case Study , 2011 .

[11]  M. Schofield,et al.  Optimized Continuous Multicolumn Chromatography Enables Increased Productivities and Cost Savings by Employing More Columns , 2018, Biotechnology journal.

[12]  E. Read,et al.  Viral clearance by flow‐through mode ion exchange columns and membrane adsorbers , 2014, Biotechnology progress.

[13]  M. Schofield,et al.  Transfer of a three step mAb chromatography process from batch to continuous: Optimizing productivity to minimize consumable requirements. , 2017, Journal of biotechnology.

[14]  Min Zhang,et al.  Quality by design approach for viral clearance by protein a chromatography , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Daniel G Bracewell,et al.  Optimising the design and operation of semi-continuous affinity chromatography for clinical and commercial manufacture. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[16]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Comparison of batch and continuous multi-column protein A capture processes by optimal design. , 2016, Biotechnology journal.

[17]  Roger W. Schmenner,et al.  LOOKING AHEAD BY LOOKING BACK: SWIFT, EVEN FLOW IN THE HISTORY OF MANUFACTURING , 2001 .

[18]  Hazel Aranha,et al.  Characterization of Coliphage PR772 and Evaluation of Its Use for Virus Filter Performance Testing , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  A. Zydney,et al.  Performance optimization of continuous countercurrent tangential chromatography for antibody capture , 2016, Biotechnology progress.

[20]  Konstantin B Konstantinov,et al.  The future of industrial bioprocessing: batch or continuous? , 2015, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  Rene Gantier,et al.  A straightforward methodology for designing continuous monoclonal antibody capture multi-column chromatography processes. , 2015, Journal of chromatography. A.

[22]  Yi Li,et al.  Development of robust antibody purification by optimizing protein‐A chromatography in combination with precipitation methodologies , 2015, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Frank Riske,et al.  Periodic counter-current chromatography -- design and operational considerations for integrated and continuous purification of proteins. , 2012, Biotechnology journal.