Estimation of current reliability in a Duane-based reliability growth model

In this article, I investigate the statistical inference concerning the current (field-stage) reliability of a reliability growth model. The model, assuming a step-intensity structure, evolves from the physical consideration of the Duane learning-curve property and incorporates the effect of a testanalyze- and-fix program that is typically undertaken in a developmental testing program. Both exact and large-sample distributional results are derived for the maximum likelihood and the least squares estimators of the current intensity. Under the assumption that the step-intensity model represents the reality, I provide an assessment of the extent of “misspecification” when the widely used power law process model is fit to the failure data of a system experiencing recurrent failures. Extensive simulation results are carried out to supplement the theoretical findings. An illustration with a dataset is provided as a demonstration of the application of the inference results.

[1]  Steven E. Rigdon,et al.  STATISTICAL INFERENCE FOR A MODULATED POWER LAW PROCESS , 1996 .

[2]  A. C. Durr.  Operational repairable equipments and the duane model , 1982 .

[3]  N. Breslow,et al.  Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models , 1993 .

[4]  W. A. Thompson,et al.  Point Process Models with Applications to Safety and Reliability , 1988 .

[5]  Thomas A. Mazzuchi,et al.  Bayesian computations for a class of reliability growth models , 1998 .

[6]  Steven E. Rigdon,et al.  Estimating the intensity function of a power law process at the current time: time truncated case , 1990 .

[7]  L. H. Crow.  Confidence Interval Procedures for the Weibull Process With Applications to Reliability Growth , 1982 .

[8]  Bev Littlewood.  Rationale for a Modified Duane Model , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[9]  J. T. Duane.  Learning Curve Approach to Reliability Monitoring , 1964, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace.

[10]  J. M. Finkelstein.  Confidence Bounds on the Parameters of the Weibull Process , 1976 .

[11]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  A Quasi-Bayes Estimate of the Failure Intensity of a Reliability-Growth Model , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[12]  Larry H. Crow,et al.  Integrated reliability growth testing , 1989, Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[13]  Larry H. Crow,et al.  Reliability Analysis for Complex, Repairable Systems , 1975 .

[14]  L. Fahrmeir,et al.  Correction: Consistency and Asymptotic Normality of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator in Generalized Linear Models , 1985 .

[15]  S. Rigdon,et al.  Estimating the intensity function of a weibull process at the current time: failure truncated case , 1988 .

[16]  Benjamin Reiser,et al.  Bayesian inference for the power law process , 1992 .

[17]  G. Pulcini,et al.  Bayes inference for a non-homogeneous Poisson process with power intensity law (reliability) , 1989 .

[18]  Nader B. Ebrahimi,et al.  How to model reliability-growth when times of design modifications are known , 1996, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[19]  R. Calabria,et al.  Bayes estimation of prediction intervals for a power law process , 1990 .

[20]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[21]  L. J. Bain,et al.  Inferences on the Parameters and Current System Reliability for a Time Truncated Weibull Process , 1980 .

[22]  Ravindra Khattree,et al.  On estimating the current intensity of failure for the power-law process , 1998 .

[23]  Larry Lee.  Comparing Rates of Several Independent Weibull Processes , 1980 .

[24]  S. K. Lee,et al.  Some Results on Inference for the Weibull Process , 1978 .