Building up child-robot relationship for therapeutic purposes: From initial attraction towards long-term social engagement

This work explores the dynamics of the emergence of the social bonds with robots. A field study with 49 sixth grade scholars (aged 11–12 years) and 4 different robots was carried out at an elementary school. A subsequent laboratory experiment with 4 of the participants was completed. For the first experience, at school children's preferences, expectancies on functionality and communication, and interaction behavior were studied. Using the data collected in the laboratory, recognition, the selection of partner, and dyadic interaction were explored. Both at school and in the lab, data from videotaped direct observation, questionnaires and interviews were gathered. The results showed that different appearance and performance of robots elicit in children distinctive perceptions and interactive behavior, and affect social processes, such as role attribution and attachment. This work presents a preliminary field study to explore the introduction of robot-based programs to improve the quality of life of hospitalized children1

[1]  Karola Pitsch,et al.  How infants perceive the toy robot Pleo. An exploratory case study on infant-robot-interaction , 2010, HRI 2010.

[2]  R. V. Ham,et al.  ANTY: the development of an intelligent huggable robot for hospitalized children , 2006 .

[3]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  INTERDEPENDENCE ,I NTERACTION, AND RELATIONSHIPS , 2002 .

[4]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Let robots do the talking , 2012, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[5]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Humans, Animals, and Robots: A Phenomenological Approach to Human-Robot Relations , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[6]  Mattias Jacobsson,et al.  Play, belief and stories about robots: A case study of a pleo blogging community , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[7]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Medical and Health-Care Robotics , 2010, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[8]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Mental commit robot and its application to therapy of children , 2001, 2001 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8556).

[9]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  Designing robots for long-term social interaction , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Testing interactive products with the robot intervention method , 2008, IDC.

[12]  Allison Druin,et al.  A storytelling robot for pediatric rehabilitation , 2000, Assets '00.

[13]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A Growing Research Field , 2007 .

[14]  Sara Ljungblad,et al.  How do you play with a robotic toy animal?: a long-term study of Pleo , 2010, IDC.

[15]  Adriana Tapus,et al.  User—robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy , 2008, Intell. Serv. Robotics.

[16]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  A Comparison of Interactive and Robotic Systems in Therapy and Education for Children with Autism , 2005 .

[17]  Hideki Kozima,et al.  Interactive robots for communication-care: a case-study in autism therapy , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..