Significance of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model

Abstract Bryde (Bryde JD. Modelling project management performance. Int J Quality Reliab Manage 2003;20(2):229–25) has presented project management performance assessment (PMPA) model. The model proposes six criteria for assessing PM performance; based upon the EFQM business excellence model. This paper examines what is the level of impact of these criteria over the project management performance (PMP) in Pakistani listed organizations. This paper also examine the scope of the association within different criteria of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model and with project management performance (PMP) in the Pakistani listed organizations and whether this association is significant, furthermore it investigate that to which extent different characteristics of PM performance, correlate with each other and with project management performance (PMP). It is concluded that the PMPA model have a potential use as framework to assess the project management performance, by conducting empirical study and checking the impact, correlation and association of the criteria of PMPA model and PMP.

[1]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Facilitating total quality through effective project management , 2000 .

[2]  J Bowe,et al.  Total quality management. , 1992, Contemporary longterm care.

[3]  Glenn L. Taylor,et al.  Generating a 'Golden Glow' , 1993 .

[4]  David H. Gobeli,et al.  Significance of project management structure on development success , 1989 .

[5]  H. Maylor.  Beyond the Gantt chart:: Project management moving on , 2001 .

[6]  James R. Evans,et al.  The management and control of quality , 1989 .

[7]  Barrie Dale,et al.  ISO 9000 series registration to total quality management: the transformation journey , 1997 .

[8]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[9]  J. Cammarano.  PROJECT MANAGEMENT : HOW TO MAKE IT HAPPEN , 1997 .

[10]  Tzvi Raz,et al.  Contribution of quality management tools and practices to project management performance , 2000 .

[11]  John M. Nicholas,et al.  Successful project management: a force-field analysis , 1989 .

[12]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[13]  David Bryde.  Underpinning modern project management with TQM principles , 1997 .

[14]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Tqm: Text with Cases , 2003 .

[15]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[16]  John Wateridge,et al.  IT projects: a basis for success , 1995 .

[17]  T. Kotnour.  Organizational learning practices in the project management environment , 2000 .

[18]  Robert J. Yourzak.  Quality in Project Management , 1997 .

[19]  Harold A. Kurstedt,et al.  Satisfying stakeholders for successful project management , 1991 .

[20]  Glenn L. Taylor,et al.  Managers at Work: Generating A ‘Golden Glow’ , 1993 .

[21]  D. Bryde.  Project management concepts, methods and application , 2003 .

[22]  Anton de Wit,et al.  Measurement of project success , 1988 .

[23]  Robert Loo.  Training in project management: a powerful tool for improving individual and team performance , 1996 .

[24]  Michael S. Deutsch,et al.  An exploratory analysis relating the software project management process to project success , 1991 .

[25]  Walter O. Rom,et al.  An empirical investigation of project evaluation criteria , 2001 .

[26]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain , 1979 .

[27]  Watts S. Humphrey,et al.  Managing the software process , 1989, The SEI series in software engineering.

[28]  David Bryde,et al.  Modelling project management performance , 2003 .

[29]  C. Bowman,et al.  Implementing strategy through projects , 1994 .

[30]  Jennifer L. Hartnett,et al.  Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge , 1988 .