On the Impact of Chat Communication on Computer-Supported Idea Generation Processes

It has been shown that traditional forms of communication negatively affect idea generation processes. Creativity support systems can help to avoid these impacts and provide alternative means of interaction for which the known negative affects do not apply. In this paper, we investigate the impact of chat communication on computer-supported idea generation processes. The results show that idea quantity, quality and group satisfaction are not affected by the option to use a chat as an additional communication channel. This implies that positive as well as negative influence factors of communication described in previous studies seem to offset each other in computer-supported idea generation processes. We discuss several of these potential positive and negative influence factors. Furthermore, we discuss why a chat feature can help to lower acceptance barriers for creativity support systems.

[1]  A. Osborn.  Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[2]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Beta Versus VHS and the Acceptance of Electronic Brainstorming Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[3]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[4]  John Kruse,et al.  Participant-driven GSS: Quality of Brainstorming and Allocation of Participant Resources , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[5]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[6]  Scott G. Isaksen,et al.  A Review of Brainstorming Research: Six Critical Issues for Inquiry , 1998 .

[7]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organization planning , 1986, CSCW '86.

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  On the Measurement of Ideation Quality , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  Group Creativity and Collaborative Technologies: Understanding the Role of Visual Anonymity , 2006, CRIWG.

[11]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  Developing CSCW tools for idea finding -: empirical results and implications for design , 2002, CSCW '02.

[12]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  DOES GROUP PARTICIPATION WHEN USING BRAINSTORMING FACILITATE OR INHIBIT CREATIVE THINKING , 1958 .

[13]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[14]  Lloyd W. Fernald,et al.  The Creative Process: Its Use and Extent of Formalization by Corporations , 1993 .

[15]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Research in creativity and GSS , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Organizational Design , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Florian Forster,et al.  Distributed Creative Problem Solving over the Web , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services.

[19]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.