Machine learning to determine the main factors affecting creep rates in laser powder bed fusion

There is an increasing need for the use of additive manufacturing (AM) to produce improved critical application engineering components. However, the materials manufactured using AM perform well below their traditionally manufactured counterparts, particularly for creep and fatigue. Research has shown that this difference in performance is due to the complex relationships between AM process parameters which affect the material microstructure and consequently the mechanical performance as well. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the impact of different AM build parameters on the mechanical performance of parts. Machine learning (ML) models are able to find hidden relationships in data using iterative statistical analyses and have the potential to develop process–structure–property–performance relationships for manufacturing processes, including AM. The aim of this work is to apply ML techniques to materials testing data in order to understand the effect of AM process parameters on the creep rate of additively built nickel-based superalloy and to predict the creep rate of the material from these process parameters. In this work, the predictive capabilities of ML and its ability to develop process–structure–property relationships are applied to the creep properties of laser powder bed fused alloy 718. The input data for the ML model included the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) build parameters used—build orientation, scan strategy and number of lasers—and geometrical material descriptors which were extracted from optical microscope porosity images using image analysis techniques. The ML model was used to predict the minimum creep rate of the Laser Powder Bed Fused alloy 718 samples, which had been creep tested at $$650\,^\circ $$ 650 ∘ C and 600 MPa. The ML model was also used to identify the most relevant material descriptors affecting the minimum creep rate of the material (determined by using an ensemble feature importance framework). The creep rate was accurately predicted with a percentage error of $$1.40\%$$ 1.40 % in the best case. The most important material descriptors were found to be part density, number of pores, build orientation and scan strategy. These findings show the applicability and potential of using ML to determine and predict the mechanical properties of materials fabricated via different manufacturing processes, and to find process–structure–property relationships in AM. This increases the readiness of AM for use in critical applications.

[1]  Linkan Bian,et al.  Deep Learning for Distortion Prediction in Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing using Big Data , 2019, Manufacturing Letters.

[2]  A. Clare,et al.  Multi-laser scan strategies for enhancing creep performance in LPBF , 2021 .

[3]  A. Clare,et al.  Powder Bed Fusion of nickel-based superalloys: A review , 2021 .

[4]  Yung C. Shin,et al.  In-Process monitoring of porosity during laser additive manufacturing process , 2019, Additive Manufacturing.

[5]  Yong Li,et al.  Applying Neural-Network-Based Machine Learning to Additive Manufacturing: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives , 2019, Engineering.

[6]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization , 2016, ICLR.

[7]  Yang Wang,et al.  Density Prediction of Selective Laser Sintering Parts Based on Artificial Neural Network , 2004, ISNN.

[8]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  M. Brochu,et al.  Densification and microstructural investigation of Inconel 718 parts fabricated by selective laser melting , 2017 .

[10]  L. Carter Selective laser melting of nickel superalloys for high temperature applications , 2013 .

[11]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: Principles and ApplicationsFifth Edition of Rapid Prototyping , 2017 .

[12]  L. Ladani,et al.  Laser Additive Melting and Solidification of Inconel 718: Finite Element Simulation and Experiment , 2016 .

[13]  S. L. Sing,et al.  Microstructure modelling for metallic additive manufacturing: a review , 2020, Virtual and Physical Prototyping.

[14]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Sequential Operations in Digital Picture Processing , 1966, JACM.

[15]  Scott Lundberg,et al.  A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions , 2017, NIPS.

[16]  Ryan R. Dehoff,et al.  Additive Manufacturing of Nickel Superalloys: Opportunities for Innovation and Challenges Related to Qualification , 2018, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[17]  Divish Rengasamy,et al.  Towards a More Reliable Interpretation of Machine Learning Outputs for Safety-Critical Systems using Feature Importance Fusion , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[18]  A. Clare,et al.  The creep behaviour of nickel alloy 718 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion , 2021, Materials & Design.

[19]  Kamran Nikbin,et al.  Predicting stress and creep life in Inconel 718 blade-disk attachments , 2020 .

[20]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Engineering Materials and Their Properties , 2019, CRC Handbook of tables for Applied Engineering Science.

[21]  Tomasz Kurzynowski,et al.  Effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Inconel 718 processed by selective laser melting , 2015 .

[22]  Xu Han,et al.  Real-Time Composition Monitoring Using Support Vector Regression of Laser-Induced Plasma for Laser Additive Manufacturing , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[23]  A. Rollett,et al.  Numerical modeling and experimental validation of thermal history and microstructure for additive manufacturing of an Inconel 718 product , 2018, Progress in Additive Manufacturing.

[24]  Kristian Martinsen,et al.  Prediction of geometry deviations in additive manufactured parts: comparison of linear regression with machine learning algorithms , 2020, J. Intell. Manuf..

[25]  Yves Chauvin,et al.  Backpropagation: theory, architectures, and applications , 1995 .

[26]  Chang Li,et al.  Enhancing Fatigue Strength of Selective Laser Melting‐Fabricated Inconel 718 by Tailoring Heat Treatment Route , 2018, Advanced Engineering Materials.

[27]  A. Clare,et al.  Creep behaviour of inconel 718 processed by laser powder bed fusion , 2018, Journal of Materials Processing Technology.

[28]  L. Murr,et al.  Microstructures and mechanical behavior of Inconel 718 fabricated by selective laser melting , 2012 .

[29]  Á. R. Machado,et al.  Improving the accuracy of machine-learning models with data from machine test repetitions , 2020, J. Intell. Manuf..

[30]  Z. Pan,et al.  Modelling and prediction of surface roughness in wire arc additive manufacturing using machine learning , 2021, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[31]  Lars Juhl Jensen,et al.  Clinical Knowledge Graph Integrates Proteomics Data into Clinical Decision-Making , 2020, bioRxiv.

[32]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Geometrical and Statistical Properties of Systems of Linear Inequalities with Applications in Pattern Recognition , 1965, IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput..

[33]  N. Stepanova,et al.  Superalloys , 2018 .

[34]  Grazziela P. Figueredo,et al.  An Intelligent Toolkit for Benchmarking Data-Driven Aerospace Prognostics , 2019, 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC).

[35]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning , 2019, Journal of Big Data.

[36]  C. Wang,et al.  Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives , 2020, Additive Manufacturing.

[37]  Ryan R. Dehoff,et al.  Numerical modeling of heat-transfer and the influence of process parameters on tailoring the grain morphology of IN718 in electron beam additive manufacturing ☆ , 2016 .

[38]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  Staged thermomechanical testing of nickel superalloys produced by selective laser melting , 2017 .

[39]  R. Reed The Superalloys by Roger C. Reed , 2006 .

[40]  M. S. Sebastián,et al.  Reduction of the Residual Porosity in Parts Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting Using Skywriting and High Focus Offset Strategies , 2016 .

[41]  Robert S. Boyer,et al.  MJRTY: A Fast Majority Vote Algorithm , 1991, Automated Reasoning: Essays in Honor of Woody Bledsoe.

[42]  Chong Teng,et al.  Influence of laser processing parameters on porosity in Inconel 718 during additive manufacturing , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[43]  D. Gu,et al.  Microstructure and tribological property of selective laser melted Ni-based composites using different scanning strategies , 2020 .

[44]  Sean L. Yoder,et al.  Characterization of topology optimized Ti-6Al-4V components using electron beam powder bed fusion , 2018 .

[45]  O. Ojo,et al.  Numerical modeling of microstructure evolution during laser additive manufacturing of a nickel-based superalloy , 2014 .

[46]  Xinhua Li,et al.  ANN model for the prediction of density in Selective Laser Sintering , 2009, Int. J. Manuf. Res..

[47]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[48]  Emmanuelle Gouillart,et al.  scikit-image: image processing in Python , 2014, PeerJ.

[49]  Jinbo Bi,et al.  Calibrating the adaptive learning rate to improve convergence of ADAM , 2019, Neurocomputing.

[50]  Zhixiong Li,et al.  Prediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning , 2019, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing.

[51]  Andy Morris,et al.  Modelling of creep in Inconel 706 turbine disc fir-tree , 2012 .

[52]  K. Kakehi,et al.  Effects of build direction and heat treatment on creep properties of Ni-base superalloy built up by additive manufacturing , 2017 .

[53]  V. Paquit,et al.  Approach to qualification using E-PBF in-situ process monitoring in Ti-6Al-4V , 2019, Additive Manufacturing.

[54]  S. Babu,et al.  In-Situ Monitoring for Defect Identification in Nickel Alloy Complex Geometries Fabricated by L-PBF Additive Manufacturing , 2020, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[55]  Travis E. Shelton,et al.  Mitigation of anisotropic fatigue in nickel alloy 718 manufactured via selective laser melting , 2019, Materials & Design.

[56]  Jay Lee,et al.  Quality analysis in metal additive manufacturing with deep learning , 2020, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[57]  S. Babu,et al.  Geometry-Induced Spatial Variation of Microstructure Evolution During Selective Electron Beam Melting of Rene-N5 , 2018, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[58]  J. Moverare,et al.  Microstructural influence on fatigue crack propagation during high cycle fatigue testing of additively manufactured Alloy 718 , 2019, Materials Characterization.

[59]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  Understanding Data Augmentation for Classification: When to Warp? , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA).

[60]  Guanqun Yu,et al.  Porosity evolution and its thermodynamic mechanism of randomly packed powder-bed during selective laser melting of Inconel 718 alloy , 2017 .

[61]  D. Deng,et al.  Additively Manufactured Inconel 718 : Microstructures and Mechanical Properties , 2018 .

[62]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[63]  Xinhua Wu,et al.  High-temperature mechanical properties of alloy 718 produced by laser powder bed fusion with different processing parameters , 2019, Additive Manufacturing.

[64]  Yu Zhou,et al.  Predicting tool wear size across multi-cutting conditions using advanced machine learning techniques , 2020, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[65]  Bernd Markert,et al.  Efficient numerical modeling of 3D-printed lattice-cell structures using neural networks , 2018 .

[66]  K. Moussaoui,et al.  Effects of Selective Laser Melting additive manufacturing parameters of Inconel 718 on porosity, microstructure and mechanical properties , 2018, Materials Science and Engineering: A.

[67]  Cynthia Rudin,et al.  All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneously , 2019, J. Mach. Learn. Res..